Customer feedback | az webapp config | `--linux-fx-version` parameter needs more explanation

[dbradish-microsoft]

Describe the bug

This GitHub issue is being moved from UUF 292301.

Summary

Please complete the following:

1. Update the short-summary for the --linux-fx-version parameter of the az webapp config set command.
2. Add more complex examples to az webapp config set command. There are 30 parameters and only 2 examples. Please see the published reference guidelines for Azure CLI examples. For example, Provide at least one example for every parameter. A single example can use multiple parameters, but a parameter that doesn't appear within an example code block often shows no usage statistics in Azure CLI reporting..

Link to az webapp config set

---

Customer feedback from UUF

Repo:

azure-docs-cli

Title:
az webapp config | Microsoft Learn

Verbatim:
this is wrong? --linux-fx-versionThe runtime stack used for your linux-based webapp, e.g., "RUBY|2.5.5", "NODE|12LTS", "PHP|7.2", "DOTNETCORE|2.1". See https://aka.ms/linux-stacks for more info.should be with : for .NET Core , like--linux-fx-version "DOTNETCORE:8.0"not --linux-fx-version "DOTNETCORE|8.0"

Verbatim Id:
169f9854-da4f-ef11-a317-000d3a59d4e9

Triaged By:
v-ommikumar@microsoft.com

Triaged Comment:

Live URL:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cli/azure/webapp/config

GitHub URL:
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs-cli/blob/live/2020-09-01-hybrid/docs-ref-autogen/webapp/config.yml

Related command

az webapp config set

Errors

n/a

Issue script & Debug output

n/a

Expected behavior

n/a

Environment Summary

Based on the date of the UUF, I'm guessing Azure CLI 2.62.0

Additional context

No response

[yonzhan]

Thank you for opening this issue, we will look into it.

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

Thanks for the feedback! We are routing this to the appropriate team for follow-up. cc @AzureAppServiceCLI, @antcp.

[seligj95]

Note

[AI-Assisted Triage] This comment was generated with AI assistance as part of an App Service CLI issue review. Reply to this comment and tag @seligj95 to follow up.

Summary: Request for more explanation and examples for the --linux-fx-version parameter — current help text doesn't provide enough guidance on valid values and formats.

Status: Feature Approved

Priority: P3

Next Steps: Documentation improvement planned — additional examples and explanation for --linux-fx-version will be added to the help text.