Firstly, thank you for sharing your great works : )
I tried to reproduce the evaluation results and I met some problems when evaluated Data Loading (Section 5.1.1 in paper).
To keep same configurations as the paper presents, I tried following commands:
# Generate same workloads
./load_gen -I10000000 -E128 -L0.03125
# And I copied the workload.txt to the directory which contains `working_version`.
# Run with tiered compaction
./working_version -P512 -B128 -E128 -C2 > load_2.txt
# Run with full compaction
./working_version -P512 -B128 -E128 -C1 -c8 > load_1_8.txt
Questions:
- In tiered compaction, the output results shows that
#kv_in_tree is 3175417, not 10000000. Is it correct? Or I can ignore this results and only focus on the #I_done.
- I am not sure that
-C1 -c8 is right config cmd for Full Comaction, as I found that the bts_wr_cmpt (about 19GB) is lower than the original evaluation result in paper (about 43GB).
- How to set config cmd for 1-Lvl compaction strategy?
Could you please give more details about evaluation processes for different compaction strategies? I'll appreciate it.
Thanks a lot~
Best Regards
Firstly, thank you for sharing your great works : )
I tried to reproduce the evaluation results and I met some problems when evaluated Data Loading (Section 5.1.1 in paper).
To keep same configurations as the paper presents, I tried following commands:
Questions:
#kv_in_treeis 3175417, not 10000000. Is it correct? Or I can ignore this results and only focus on the#I_done.-C1 -c8is right config cmd for Full Comaction, as I found that thebts_wr_cmpt(about 19GB) is lower than the original evaluation result in paper (about 43GB).Could you please give more details about evaluation processes for different compaction strategies? I'll appreciate it.
Thanks a lot~
Best Regards