Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
And although I incorporated saving of RWS in RegiStax and now also in waveSharp I am not a fan of using a "one scheme fits all" option. Sharpening images needs to be done with some care and rough presets can help with that, but I dont think that you need a very large amount of presets. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
initial request #41 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Also in waveSharp I suggest to use the new FFT-denoise instead of the old blur-styled denoise from RegiStax. That is still available (as a separate filter in each layer) but its not as accurate as FFT denoising. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
If there is an (approximate) correlation between the wavelet-profiles from RegiStaxx to waveSharp, it would be awesome if the old xxxx.rwv files could be imported.
It would probably be enough if the the previous values for the first three wavelets would be mapped:
Even if the do not correlate 100%, it might be helpful for people that have complex wavelet-profiles stored.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions