Are module-level fields supported?

[CedX]

I can't generate the documentation of module-level fields no matter what I try.
For this sample:

/** A sample typedef. **/
typedef SampleTypedef = {

	/** A sample field. **/
	var aSampleField: String;
}

/** A sample function. **/
function aSampleFunction() {
	// Some code.
}

Only the typedef appears in the generated documentation.

[nanjizal]

This is my approach, but hoping they are added soon.
I am not sure on how to implement but let me know if you have insight.
https://github.com/nanjizal/cornerContour/blob/main/src/cornerContour/color/ColorHelp.hx

[nanjizal]

No idea on how optimal Module Level fields are but using them with abstract types can seems a clean even functional design pattern. Pure functions are often ideal then wrap them inline in an abstract type or even a class, it allows for best functional and also a more structured semi or fully oop class approach?
It allows haxe to be superflexible, would love to help dox support this or see it working, been a few years since module level functions were added to haxe ecosystem... Can we help what is the current roadblock?

[nanjizal]

maybe a macros can generate them, but macros I am not an expert but if you have ideas lets explore..?