Per JOSS review criteria, the paper needs a section providing evidence of realized impact or credible near-term significance.
The paper already contains strong material that could serve this purpose:
- Benchmark results (Section 5) demonstrating performance and memory improvements over
StatsBase.sample
- The on-disk sampling application (Section 6) with 100 GB datasets
- The published research on AlgWRSWRSKIP (reference [9])
However, this isn't framed as a "Research Impact" section. I'd suggest, if possible:
Adding a brief dedicated subsection explicitly framing the above as evidence of near-term scholarly significance,
If no external adoption evidence exists yet, the benchmarks and the accepted publication are likely sufficient, but the framing should be made explicit.
Per JOSS review criteria, the paper needs a section providing evidence of realized impact or credible near-term significance.
The paper already contains strong material that could serve this purpose:
StatsBase.sampleHowever, this isn't framed as a "Research Impact" section. I'd suggest, if possible:
Adding a brief dedicated subsection explicitly framing the above as evidence of near-term scholarly significance,
If no external adoption evidence exists yet, the benchmarks and the accepted publication are likely sufficient, but the framing should be made explicit.