Science Analysis goals for 2017 SLAC Meeting

[jbkalmbach]

What do we hope to have ready by the SLAC Meeting and what can we finish up with only Run 1.1 data.

Edit this post to create a checklist below:

• Issue 1
• Issue 2

[jbkalmbach]

@drphilmarshall @rbiswas4 What do we hope to have running in the monitor by the SLAC Meeting?

[drphilmarshall]

I think my goals are more oriented towards the Twinkles analysis results - the Monitor is our primary tool for that, but the results need to be based on the SN error model, I think. Goals: 1. I'd like to know, quantitatively, how closely the DM measurements and error bars match their theoretical expectations 2. I'd like to see a (stub of a ?) recipe for simulating much larger mock datasets using the Twinkles error model as input. What do you think?

…

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Bryce Kalmbach ***@***.***> wrote: @drphilmarshall <https://github.com/drphilmarshall> @rbiswas4 <https://github.com/rbiswas4> What do we hope to have running in the monitor by the SLAC Meeting? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#76 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AArY9_PpKNB5KNNVD4F66H6lSgIMcWgkks5rT_KFgaJpZM4LovWs> .