Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
|
I am not familiar with how nixos or flake works so I let contributers make the changes. I could dive into the documentation and see how things could be changed but if you have more experience with flake it would be appreciated if you would be willing to help |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Maintainer of the nixpkgs package here. We could consider removing the flake entirely or referring to the upstream package in the README. That way, people will have an easier time installing spotatui. If someone wants to use the master branch, they can still do so using the nixpkgs package and an overlay. While this is a little bit less convenient, it would save us the maintenance burden of the flake. Would a PR adjusting the README's installation instruction to use the package from nixpkgs be welcome? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
With the nature of this project being very "new" and having a very fast commit to release speed (from what I can see) is there any reason why I can't change the way the current nix flake thats inside this repo work?
I want to change it to build from source (as in latest commit from time if import)
currently spotatui is already packaged inside nixpkgs (nix package manager) and seams to be ahead (it's on 0.37.0 while loading the flake gives me 0.36.3-debug.1) compared to the flake that's setup for this repo. A lot of the time when a flake is inside a repo and it's also packaged on nixpkgs it's because people want to run on the bleeding edge and have it built from source
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions