diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json b/rag-agentic-dashboard/data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..93057f16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json
@@ -0,0 +1,1062 @@
+{
+ "docRef": "SENTINEL-GSTACK-GSIFI-2030-WP-065",
+ "version": "1.0.0",
+ "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 & G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture for AGI/ASI Governance in G-SIFIs — 2026-2030 Technical & Governance Analysis and Design",
+ "horizon": "2026-2030",
+ "apiPrefix": "/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030",
+ "buildsOn": [
+ "WP-060",
+ "WP-061",
+ "WP-062",
+ "WP-063",
+ "WP-064"
+ ],
+ "status": "platform-and-civilizational-assurance-design",
+ "classification": "Confidential / Restricted — Board, CEO, CRO, CCO, CISO, CDAO, CTO, Enterprise Architects, AI Platform Engineers, AI Safety Researchers, Model Risk, Internal Audit, External Regulators & Supervisory Colleges",
+ "audiences": [
+ "Board & Board Technology/Risk Committees",
+ "C-Suite (CEO, CRO, CCO, CISO, CDAO, CTO)",
+ "Enterprise Architects & AI Platform Engineers",
+ "AI Safety & Alignment Researchers",
+ "Model Risk Management & Independent Validation",
+ "Internal Audit & SMCR Accountable Executives",
+ "External Regulators & Supervisory Colleges"
+ ],
+ "directive": {
+ "scope": "Provide the technical and governance analysis and design for (1) the Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFI deployment, (2) its formal-verification regime (TLA+/Coq, OPA/Rego, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification), (3) the multi-decade, regulator-grade G-Stack civilizational-assurance architecture (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame) with stress-testing, failure-surface compendia, simulation, lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance, and (4) jurisdiction-aware, anticipatory compliance and supervisory artifacts aligned to EU AI Act 2024/1689 Annex IV, NIST AI RMF 1.0/600-1, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer Duty/SMCR and MAS/HKMA FEAT in a multipolar 2026-2030 world.",
+ "outcomes": [
+ "Sentinel v2.4 deployed across material AI with OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway and hardware kill switch by 2027",
+ "Zero-trust K8s/Kafka/OPA backbone with PQC WORM telemetry operational by 2027",
+ "Formal-verification regime (TLA+/Coq + OPA/Rego + zk-SNARK CAS-SPP) gating frontier promotion by 2028",
+ "G-Stack civilizational-assurance layers operational with perpetual assurance protocols by 2029",
+ "Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance artifacts auto-emitted to supervisory colleges by 2029"
+ ],
+ "doNot": [
+ "Do NOT route any AGI/ASI-class request outside the Sovereign API Gateway + OPA guardrails",
+ "Do NOT operate without PQC WORM telemetry and a tested hardware kill switch",
+ "Do NOT promote a frontier system with a failing TLA+/Coq proof or unverified adaptive mechanism",
+ "Do NOT disable perpetual assurance monitoring or lifecycle-integrity reporting",
+ "Do NOT assume single-jurisdiction compliance in a multipolar regulatory world"
+ ]
+ },
+ "indices": {
+ "Sentinel-GuardrailCoverage": ">=0.98 (decisions through OPA guardrails)",
+ "GIEN-TelemetryCompleteness": "1.0 (governance-instrumented event coverage)",
+ "SovereignGateway-PolicyEnforcement": "1.0 (requests policy-checked at gateway)",
+ "KillSwitch-Readiness": "1.0 (hardware kill switch verified & drilled)",
+ "ZeroTrust-mTLSCoverage": ">=0.99 (service-to-service mTLS / SPIFFE)",
+ "PQC-WORM-Integrity": "1.0 (post-quantum-signed append-only telemetry)",
+ "TLAPlus-ModelCheckPass": "1.0 (temporal safety/liveness per merge)",
+ "Coq-ProofObligationsClosed": ">=0.98 (discharged obligations)",
+ "OPA-PolicyVerifyPass": "1.0 (Rego policy verification suite)",
+ "zkSNARK-CASSPP-VerifyRate": "1.0 (CAS-SPP audit proofs accepted)",
+ "AdaptiveMechanism-VerifyRate": ">=0.95 (verified adaptive updates)",
+ "GStack-PerpetualAssurance": ">=0.99 (continuous assurance uptime)",
+ "FailureSurface-Coverage": ">=0.90 (catalogued vs modeled failure surfaces)",
+ "Jurisdiction-CompliancePosture": ">=0.95 (jurisdictions green at gate)"
+ },
+ "tiers": {
+ "T0-Lab": "Containment lab only; Sentinel shadow; no production routing.",
+ "T1-Assisted": "Human-in-the-loop; gateway + guardrails; GIEN telemetry on.",
+ "T2-Supervised": "Material decisions; full formal verification; PQC WORM.",
+ "T3-Autonomous-Constrained": "Bounded autonomy; zk-SNARK CAS-SPP; G-Stack assurance.",
+ "T4-Frontier-Class": "AGI/ASI-grade; Meta-Endgame governance; treaty-aligned; quorum kill switch."
+ },
+ "severities": {
+ "S1-Systemic": "Civilizational/systemic loss-of-control potential; Meta-Endgame + regulator + containment.",
+ "S2-Severe": "Material prudential/consumer harm; CRO + SMCR exec; halt + remediate.",
+ "S3-Elevated": "Localized harm or control gap; model owner + MRM; mitigate within SLA.",
+ "S4-Routine": "Drift/quality deviation; automated rollback + ticket."
+ },
+ "investment": {
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "programWindow": "2026-2030 (5 years; perpetual-assurance steady state beyond)",
+ "totalRange": "$220M-$390M (G-SIFI scale; multi-decade assurance, risk-adjusted)",
+ "breakdown": {
+ "Sentinel v2.4 platform (gateway, GIEN, guardrails, kill switch)": "$55M-$95M",
+ "Zero-trust backbone (K8s/Kafka/OPA, PQC WORM, SPIFFE)": "$35M-$60M",
+ "Formal verification (TLA+/Coq, OPA verify, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP)": "$45M-$80M",
+ "G-Stack civilizational assurance (10 layers, simulation, perpetual assurance)": "$50M-$90M",
+ "Jurisdiction-aware compliance & supervisory artifacts": "$20M-$35M",
+ "Governance, stress-testing, training & assurance ops": "$15M-$30M"
+ }
+ },
+ "modules": [
+ {
+ "mid": "M1",
+ "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack",
+ "purpose": "The institutional control plane for G-SIFI AGI/ASI: OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway, hardware kill switch, and GIEN systemic-risk coordination — the single mediated path for all governed AI traffic.",
+ "sections": [
+ {
+ "sid": "M1.1",
+ "title": "OPA guardrails",
+ "description": "Inline policy guardrails evaluating every request/decision against regulatory and internal Rego policies before execution.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Deny-by-default",
+ "Policy versioned in CI",
+ "Decision logs to PQC WORM"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M1.2",
+ "title": "GIEN telemetry",
+ "description": "Governance-Instrumented Event Network: structured, signed telemetry of every governed decision, gate and override for observability and systemic-risk coordination.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Complete event coverage",
+ "Signed events",
+ "Systemic-risk feed"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M1.3",
+ "title": "Sovereign API Gateway",
+ "description": "The sole mediated ingress/egress for AGI/ASI-class capabilities; enforces identity, policy, rate, jurisdiction and containment posture.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Single mediated path",
+ "Jurisdiction-aware routing",
+ "Containment-aware throttling"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M1.4",
+ "title": "Hardware kill switch",
+ "description": "Quorum-authorized physical + logical kill switch with proven reachability (TLA+) and quarterly drills.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Quorum (n-of-m)",
+ "TLA+ reachability proof",
+ "Quarterly drill"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M1.5",
+ "title": "GIEN systemic-risk coordination",
+ "description": "Cross-system coordination using GIEN feeds to detect correlated/contagion behavior and trigger graduated containment.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Correlation detection",
+ "Graduated containment",
+ "Regulator notify hooks"
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "mid": "M2",
+ "title": "Zero-Trust Backbone — Kubernetes / Kafka / OPA + PQC WORM",
+ "purpose": "The runtime substrate beneath Sentinel v2.4: a zero-trust Kubernetes/Kafka/OPA backbone with post-quantum-signed WORM telemetry providing tamper-evident, deterministically replayable audit.",
+ "sections": [
+ {
+ "sid": "M2.1",
+ "title": "Zero-trust service mesh",
+ "description": "SPIFFE/SPIRE identities and mTLS for all service-to-service traffic; no implicit trust.",
+ "controls": [
+ "SPIFFE/SPIRE identity",
+ "mTLS everywhere",
+ "Per-tier namespace isolation"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M2.2",
+ "title": "Kafka event backbone",
+ "description": "Governed Kafka topics with ACLs carry GIEN telemetry and audit events at scale.",
+ "controls": [
+ "ACL governance",
+ "Schema registry",
+ "Topic-level retention policy"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M2.3",
+ "title": "OPA policy plane",
+ "description": "Centralized OPA evaluates admission and decision-time policy; integrates with Sentinel guardrails.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Admission webhooks",
+ "Decision logging",
+ "Policy unit tests"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M2.4",
+ "title": "PQC WORM telemetry",
+ "description": "Append-only, hash-chained, post-quantum-signed (e.g., ML-DSA) write-once telemetry enabling deterministic replay.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Append-only",
+ "PQC signatures",
+ "Deterministic replay (DRI)"
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "mid": "M3",
+ "title": "Formal Verification & Cryptographic Audit",
+ "purpose": "Machine-checked assurance for Sentinel and G-Stack: TLA+/Coq proofs, OPA/Rego policy verification, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, and verification of dynamic adaptive mechanisms.",
+ "sections": [
+ {
+ "sid": "M3.1",
+ "title": "TLA+/Coq proofs",
+ "description": "Temporal safety/liveness (TLA+: kill-switch reachability, no-unsafe-terminal) and deductive correctness (Coq: policy-monotonicity, audit-completeness, replay-determinism).",
+ "controls": [
+ "Model-check in CI",
+ "Proof obligations closed",
+ "Versioned with code"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M3.2",
+ "title": "OPA/Rego policy verification",
+ "description": "Formal verification of Rego policies (coverage, conflict-freedom, regulatory-mapping completeness) as a CI gate.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Coverage proofs",
+ "Conflict detection",
+ "Reg-mapping completeness"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M3.3",
+ "title": "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit",
+ "description": "Zero-knowledge proofs over CAS-SPP staged-promotion records: prove containment-gate compliance and audit integrity without disclosing internals.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Circuit per gate statement",
+ "Verifier-accepted proofs",
+ "Anchored in PQC WORM"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M3.4",
+ "title": "Dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification",
+ "description": "Verify that online-learning / self-modifying / adaptive mechanisms preserve bound invariants across updates (runtime monitors + re-proof triggers).",
+ "controls": [
+ "Invariant-preserving updates",
+ "Re-proof on adaptation",
+ "Rollback on violation"
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "mid": "M4",
+ "title": "G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture",
+ "purpose": "A multi-decade, regulator-grade civilizational-assurance architecture composed of ten named layers, from data substrate to the Meta-Endgame governance apex, designed for frontier and AGI/ASI systems in a multipolar world.",
+ "sections": [
+ {
+ "sid": "M4.1",
+ "title": "G-Stack overview",
+ "description": "Ten composable layers (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame) providing defense-in-depth from data integrity to civilizational endgame governance.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Layered defense-in-depth",
+ "Each layer independently assured",
+ "Meta-Endgame apex authority"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M4.2",
+ "title": "Substrate & registry layers",
+ "description": "GAIRDS (data substrate), GRI (registry/index), CEE (compliance/evaluation engine) provide the assured foundation.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Data integrity gates",
+ "Authoritative registry",
+ "Continuous evaluation"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M4.3",
+ "title": "Network & sentinel layers",
+ "description": "NSNs (networked sentinel nodes), CESE (containment/escalation sentinel engine), GROP (resilience/operations protocol).",
+ "controls": [
+ "Distributed sentinels",
+ "Escalation engine",
+ "Resilience protocol"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M4.4",
+ "title": "Health, systemic-risk & endgame layers",
+ "description": "GHP (health protocol), GSRM (systemic-risk monitor), GEA (assurance authority), Meta-Endgame (apex civilizational governance).",
+ "controls": [
+ "Continuous health checks",
+ "Systemic-risk monitoring",
+ "Apex endgame controls"
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "mid": "M5",
+ "title": "Stress-Testing, Failure Surfaces & Simulation",
+ "purpose": "Adversarial stress-test frameworks, a failure-surface compendium, and simulation frameworks that exercise Sentinel + G-Stack under crisis to evidence resilience for regulators.",
+ "sections": [
+ {
+ "sid": "M5.1",
+ "title": "Stress-test frameworks",
+ "description": "Scenario libraries (flash-crash, deceptive-alignment, coordinated-agent, supply-chain compromise, jurisdictional fragmentation) run against the live stack.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Quarterly stress tests",
+ "Severity-tiered scenarios",
+ "Findings -> assurance backlog"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M5.2",
+ "title": "Failure-surface compendium",
+ "description": "A maintained catalogue of failure surfaces across data, model, policy, infra, crypto, governance and cross-jurisdiction dimensions, each with detection and mitigation.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Catalogued surfaces",
+ "Detection + mitigation per surface",
+ "Coverage tracking"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M5.3",
+ "title": "Simulation frameworks",
+ "description": "Digital-twin and Monte-Carlo simulation of Sentinel/G-Stack behavior and systemic contagion, feeding Bayesian systemic-risk estimates.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Digital-twin sims",
+ "Monte-Carlo contagion",
+ "BBN evidence feed"
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "mid": "M6",
+ "title": "Lifecycle Integrity & Perpetual Assurance",
+ "purpose": "Lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance protocols ensuring the stack remains trustworthy across a multi-decade horizon, not just at deployment.",
+ "sections": [
+ {
+ "sid": "M6.1",
+ "title": "Lifecycle-integrity reporting",
+ "description": "Continuous attestation across build -> deploy -> operate -> adapt -> retire, with signed integrity reports for boards and regulators.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Per-stage attestation",
+ "Signed integrity reports",
+ "Drift-from-baseline alerts"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M6.2",
+ "title": "Perpetual assurance protocols",
+ "description": "Always-on assurance: continuous re-verification, evidence freshness SLAs, and automatic re-proof on change or environmental shift.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Continuous re-verification",
+ "Evidence freshness SLA",
+ "Auto re-proof triggers"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M6.3",
+ "title": "Multi-decade governance continuity",
+ "description": "Crypto-agility, key-rotation, standard-version migration and institutional-memory protocols to sustain assurance over decades.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Crypto-agility",
+ "Standard-migration runbooks",
+ "Institutional-memory archive"
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "mid": "M7",
+ "title": "Jurisdiction-Aware Anticipatory Compliance & Supervisory Artifacts",
+ "purpose": "Compliance that anticipates regulatory divergence in a multipolar world and emits machine-readable supervisory artifacts mapped per jurisdiction.",
+ "sections": [
+ {
+ "sid": "M7.1",
+ "title": "Jurisdiction-aware policy routing",
+ "description": "Sovereign API Gateway + OPA select the strictest applicable jurisdictional policy per request; conflicts resolved conservatively.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Per-jurisdiction policy sets",
+ "Strictest-applicable resolution",
+ "Routing audit"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M7.2",
+ "title": "Anticipatory compliance",
+ "description": "Horizon-scanning of pending rules (e.g., evolving GPAI/systemic-risk guidance) with pre-built control deltas activated on adoption.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Regulatory horizon scan",
+ "Pre-built control deltas",
+ "Activation runbooks"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M7.3",
+ "title": "Supervisory artifact design",
+ "description": "Auto-generated Annex-IV dossiers, SR 11-7 packs, DORA resilience evidence and FEAT/Consumer-Duty artifacts, with zk-SNARK proofs where IP-sensitive.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Annex IV / SR 11-7 / DORA packs",
+ "zk proofs for IP-sensitive",
+ "Supervisory-college export"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "sid": "M7.4",
+ "title": "Operational-resilience alignment (NIS2/DORA)",
+ "description": "ICT third-party risk, incident reporting, threat-led testing and resilience evidence mapped to NIS2 and DORA.",
+ "controls": [
+ "ICT third-party register",
+ "Incident reporting SLA",
+ "Threat-led pen testing"
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "mid": "M8",
+ "title": "Regulator-Ready Report Sections",
+ "purpose": "Board- and regulator-facing narrative sections rendered with /<abstract>/<content> for direct inclusion in supervisory dossiers.",
+ "sections": [
+ {
+ "sid": "M8.1",
+ "title": "Report section index",
+ "description": "Five whitepaper sections covering Sentinel v2.4, formal verification, the G-Stack, stress-testing/perpetual assurance, and jurisdiction-aware compliance.",
+ "controls": [
+ "Sections versioned",
+ "Board-reviewed",
+ "Regulator-ready"
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "sentinelComponents": [
+ {
+ "scid": "SEN-01",
+ "component": "OPA Guardrails",
+ "plane": "policy",
+ "function": "Inline deny-by-default policy evaluation on every governed request/decision.",
+ "killSwitchLinked": true
+ },
+ {
+ "scid": "SEN-02",
+ "component": "GIEN Telemetry",
+ "plane": "observability",
+ "function": "Signed governance-instrumented event network for full decision observability.",
+ "killSwitchLinked": false
+ },
+ {
+ "scid": "SEN-03",
+ "component": "Sovereign API Gateway",
+ "plane": "ingress",
+ "function": "Sole mediated, jurisdiction-aware path for AGI/ASI-class capabilities.",
+ "killSwitchLinked": true
+ },
+ {
+ "scid": "SEN-04",
+ "component": "Hardware Kill Switch",
+ "plane": "containment",
+ "function": "Quorum-authorized physical+logical halt with TLA+-proven reachability.",
+ "killSwitchLinked": true
+ },
+ {
+ "scid": "SEN-05",
+ "component": "GIEN Systemic-Risk Coordinator",
+ "plane": "systemic-risk",
+ "function": "Cross-system contagion detection and graduated containment.",
+ "killSwitchLinked": true
+ },
+ {
+ "scid": "SEN-06",
+ "component": "PQC WORM Telemetry Store",
+ "plane": "audit",
+ "function": "Append-only, post-quantum-signed, deterministically replayable audit.",
+ "killSwitchLinked": false
+ },
+ {
+ "scid": "SEN-07",
+ "component": "Zero-Trust Mesh (SPIFFE/SPIRE)",
+ "plane": "identity",
+ "function": "mTLS service identity for all service-to-service traffic.",
+ "killSwitchLinked": false
+ },
+ {
+ "scid": "SEN-08",
+ "component": "CAS-SPP Audit Bridge",
+ "plane": "assurance",
+ "function": "Feeds CAS-SPP staged-promotion records into zk-SNARK audit.",
+ "killSwitchLinked": false
+ }
+ ],
+ "gstackLayers": [
+ {
+ "glid": "GAIRDS",
+ "layer": "Governed AI Resource & Data Substrate",
+ "tier": "substrate",
+ "purpose": "Assured data/resource substrate with integrity gates and provenance.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "data-integrity gates",
+ "lineage",
+ "PQC WORM"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "glid": "GRI",
+ "layer": "Governance Registry & Index",
+ "tier": "registry",
+ "purpose": "Authoritative registry/index of governed systems, BBOMs and invariants.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "authoritative registry",
+ "BBOM linkage"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "glid": "CEE",
+ "layer": "Compliance & Evaluation Engine",
+ "tier": "evaluation",
+ "purpose": "Continuous compliance evaluation and conformance scoring.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "continuous eval",
+ "conformance scoring"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "glid": "NSNs",
+ "layer": "Networked Sentinel Nodes",
+ "tier": "network",
+ "purpose": "Distributed sentinel nodes observing and enforcing across the estate.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "distributed sentinels",
+ "GIEN feeds"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "glid": "CESE",
+ "layer": "Containment & Escalation Sentinel Engine",
+ "tier": "containment",
+ "purpose": "Detects breach conditions and orchestrates graduated escalation/containment.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "escalation engine",
+ "kill-switch linkage"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "glid": "GROP",
+ "layer": "Governance Resilience & Operations Protocol",
+ "tier": "resilience",
+ "purpose": "Operational-resilience protocol (NIS2/DORA-aligned) for the governance stack itself.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "resilience protocol",
+ "incident SLAs"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "glid": "GHP",
+ "layer": "Governance Health Protocol",
+ "tier": "health",
+ "purpose": "Continuous health checks and self-diagnostics of assurance components.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "health checks",
+ "self-diagnostics"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "glid": "GSRM",
+ "layer": "Governance Systemic-Risk Monitor",
+ "tier": "systemic-risk",
+ "purpose": "Monitors systemic/contagion risk across systems and jurisdictions.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "systemic-risk monitor",
+ "BBN estimates"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "glid": "GEA",
+ "layer": "Governance Endgame Assurance",
+ "tier": "assurance",
+ "purpose": "Authority binding perpetual assurance evidence to board/regulator attestations.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "perpetual assurance",
+ "signed attestations"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "glid": "Meta-Endgame",
+ "layer": "Meta-Endgame Governance Apex",
+ "tier": "apex",
+ "purpose": "Apex civilizational-governance authority for frontier/AGI/ASI loss-of-control scenarios.",
+ "assuredBy": [
+ "apex authority",
+ "treaty-aligned",
+ "quorum kill switch"
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "verificationArtifacts": [
+ {
+ "vaid": "VER-01",
+ "artifact": "TLA+ Containment-Reachability",
+ "method": "TLA+",
+ "property": "liveness",
+ "statement": "Quorum-authorized kill switch is always eventually reachable.",
+ "gate": "frontier-merge"
+ },
+ {
+ "vaid": "VER-02",
+ "artifact": "TLA+ No-Unsafe-Terminal",
+ "method": "TLA+",
+ "property": "safety",
+ "statement": "No execution reaches a policy-unsafe terminal state.",
+ "gate": "frontier-merge"
+ },
+ {
+ "vaid": "VER-03",
+ "artifact": "Coq Policy-Monotonicity",
+ "method": "Coq",
+ "property": "correctness",
+ "statement": "Tightening policy never increases permitted actions.",
+ "gate": "policy-release"
+ },
+ {
+ "vaid": "VER-04",
+ "artifact": "Coq Replay-Determinism",
+ "method": "Coq",
+ "property": "correctness",
+ "statement": "Replaying PQC WORM reproduces the identical decision sequence.",
+ "gate": "audit-release"
+ },
+ {
+ "vaid": "VER-05",
+ "artifact": "OPA/Rego Verification Suite",
+ "method": "OPA-verify",
+ "property": "policy",
+ "statement": "Rego policies are conflict-free and regulatory-mapping complete.",
+ "gate": "policy-release"
+ },
+ {
+ "vaid": "VER-06",
+ "artifact": "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP Audit",
+ "method": "zk-SNARK",
+ "property": "audit",
+ "statement": "All CAS-SPP promotions satisfied their containment gates (zero-knowledge).",
+ "gate": "promotion"
+ },
+ {
+ "vaid": "VER-07",
+ "artifact": "Adaptive-Mechanism Re-Proof",
+ "method": "runtime+re-proof",
+ "property": "invariant-preservation",
+ "statement": "Adaptive updates preserve bound invariants or roll back.",
+ "gate": "adaptation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "failureSurfaces": [
+ {
+ "fsid": "FS-01",
+ "surface": "Data poisoning / lineage break",
+ "dimension": "data",
+ "detection": "GAIRDS integrity gates + lineage diff",
+ "mitigation": "Quarantine + re-attest BBOM"
+ },
+ {
+ "fsid": "FS-02",
+ "surface": "Policy gap / conflict",
+ "dimension": "policy",
+ "detection": "OPA verification suite",
+ "mitigation": "Block release; resolve conflict"
+ },
+ {
+ "fsid": "FS-03",
+ "surface": "Deceptive alignment / capability concealment",
+ "dimension": "model",
+ "detection": "Crisis sims + GIEN anomaly",
+ "mitigation": "Demote tier; containment"
+ },
+ {
+ "fsid": "FS-04",
+ "surface": "Crypto break (quantum)",
+ "dimension": "crypto",
+ "detection": "Q#/PQC posture monitor",
+ "mitigation": "Crypto-agility migration"
+ },
+ {
+ "fsid": "FS-05",
+ "surface": "Kill-switch unreachability",
+ "dimension": "containment",
+ "detection": "TLA+ proof + drill",
+ "mitigation": "Re-establish quorum path"
+ },
+ {
+ "fsid": "FS-06",
+ "surface": "Cross-jurisdiction conflict",
+ "dimension": "regulatory",
+ "detection": "Jurisdiction policy resolver",
+ "mitigation": "Strictest-applicable + escalate"
+ },
+ {
+ "fsid": "FS-07",
+ "surface": "ICT third-party compromise",
+ "dimension": "infra",
+ "detection": "GROP/DORA monitoring",
+ "mitigation": "Isolate; incident report SLA"
+ },
+ {
+ "fsid": "FS-08",
+ "surface": "Correlated multi-agent contagion",
+ "dimension": "systemic",
+ "detection": "GSRM + GIEN coordinator",
+ "mitigation": "Graduated containment"
+ }
+ ],
+ "jurisdictions": [
+ {
+ "jrid": "EU",
+ "jurisdiction": "European Union",
+ "regimes": [
+ "EU AI Act 2024/1689 (Annex IV)",
+ "GDPR Art. 22",
+ "NIS2",
+ "DORA"
+ ],
+ "posture": "strictest-applicable baseline"
+ },
+ {
+ "jrid": "US",
+ "jurisdiction": "United States",
+ "regimes": [
+ "NIST AI RMF 1.0",
+ "NIST AI 600-1",
+ "SR 11-7",
+ "FCRA/ECOA"
+ ],
+ "posture": "model-risk + fair-lending"
+ },
+ {
+ "jrid": "UK",
+ "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom",
+ "regimes": [
+ "FCA Consumer Duty",
+ "SMCR",
+ "Basel III/IV (PRA)"
+ ],
+ "posture": "outcomes + accountability"
+ },
+ {
+ "jrid": "SG",
+ "jurisdiction": "Singapore",
+ "regimes": [
+ "MAS FEAT"
+ ],
+ "posture": "fairness/ethics/accountability/transparency"
+ },
+ {
+ "jrid": "HK",
+ "jurisdiction": "Hong Kong",
+ "regimes": [
+ "HKMA FEAT-aligned"
+ ],
+ "posture": "FEAT-aligned governance"
+ },
+ {
+ "jrid": "INTL",
+ "jurisdiction": "International / Basel",
+ "regimes": [
+ "Basel III/IV",
+ "ISO/IEC 42001"
+ ],
+ "posture": "prudential + AIMS"
+ }
+ ],
+ "reportSections": [
+ {
+ "rsid": "RS-01",
+ "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFIs",
+ "abstract": "The institutional control plane mediating all AGI/ASI traffic through OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, a Sovereign API Gateway and a hardware kill switch.",
+ "content": "Sentinel v2.4 enforces deny-by-default OPA guardrails on every governed decision, instruments all activity through the GIEN signed telemetry network, and routes AGI/ASI-class capabilities exclusively through a jurisdiction-aware Sovereign API Gateway. A quorum-authorized hardware kill switch — with TLA+-proven reachability and quarterly drills — provides last-resort containment, while the GIEN systemic-risk coordinator detects correlated/contagion behavior across systems and triggers graduated containment with regulator-notification hooks."
+ },
+ {
+ "rsid": "RS-02",
+ "title": "Formal Verification & Cryptographic Audit",
+ "abstract": "Machine-checked safety/liveness, verified policy, and zero-knowledge audit of staged promotion.",
+ "content": "TLA+ establishes containment-reachability and no-unsafe-terminal properties; Coq discharges policy-monotonicity, audit-completeness and replay-determinism; an OPA/Rego verification suite proves conflict-freedom and regulatory-mapping completeness; and zk-SNARK proofs over CAS-SPP records demonstrate that every staged promotion satisfied its containment gate without disclosing internals. Dynamic adaptive mechanisms are continuously monitored and re-proven, rolling back any update that would violate a bound invariant."
+ },
+ {
+ "rsid": "RS-03",
+ "title": "The G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture",
+ "abstract": "A ten-layer, multi-decade, regulator-grade assurance stack from data substrate to the Meta-Endgame apex.",
+ "content": "The G-Stack composes GAIRDS (substrate), GRI (registry), CEE (evaluation), NSNs (networked sentinels), CESE (containment/escalation), GROP (resilience/operations), GHP (health), GSRM (systemic-risk monitor), GEA (endgame assurance) and the Meta-Endgame governance apex. Each layer is independently assured and contributes defense-in-depth, with the Meta-Endgame layer holding treaty-aligned apex authority for frontier and AGI/ASI loss-of-control scenarios in a multipolar world."
+ },
+ {
+ "rsid": "RS-04",
+ "title": "Stress-Testing, Failure Surfaces & Perpetual Assurance",
+ "abstract": "Adversarial stress tests, a maintained failure-surface compendium, simulation, and always-on perpetual assurance across decades.",
+ "content": "Quarterly stress tests exercise flash-crash, deceptive-alignment, coordinated-agent, supply-chain and jurisdictional-fragmentation scenarios against the live stack. A failure-surface compendium catalogues data, model, policy, infra, crypto, regulatory and systemic surfaces with detection and mitigation for each. Digital-twin and Monte-Carlo simulations feed Bayesian systemic-risk estimates, while lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance protocols sustain trustworthiness through continuous re-verification, evidence-freshness SLAs and crypto-agility over a multi-decade horizon."
+ },
+ {
+ "rsid": "RS-05",
+ "title": "Jurisdiction-Aware Anticipatory Compliance for a Multipolar World",
+ "abstract": "Strictest-applicable jurisdictional routing and anticipatory supervisory-artifact generation for 2026-2030.",
+ "content": "The Sovereign API Gateway and OPA select the strictest applicable jurisdictional policy per request, resolving conflicts conservatively. Horizon-scanning of pending rules pre-builds control deltas activated on adoption, and ARRE-style generation emits Annex-IV dossiers, SR 11-7 packs, DORA resilience evidence and FEAT/Consumer-Duty artifacts — with zk-SNARK proofs where intellectual property is sensitive — exportable to supervisory colleges across the EU, US, UK, Singapore, Hong Kong and Basel/ISO international regimes."
+ }
+ ],
+ "schemas": {
+ "SentinelComponent": "scid, component, plane, function, killSwitchLinked",
+ "GStackLayer": "glid, layer, tier, purpose, assuredBy[]",
+ "VerificationArtifact": "vaid, artifact, method(TLA+|Coq|OPA-verify|zk-SNARK|runtime+re-proof), property, statement, gate",
+ "FailureSurface": "fsid, surface, dimension, detection, mitigation",
+ "GienEvent": "eventId, prevHash, payloadHash, signer, pqcSignature, plane, ts",
+ "JurisdictionPolicy": "jrid, jurisdiction, regimes[], posture"
+ },
+ "code": {
+ "rego_examples": [
+ "package sentinel.gateway\n# Sovereign API Gateway: deny AGI/ASI-class routes lacking guardrail + kill-switch readiness\ndefault allow = false\nallow {\n input.route.class == \"agi\"\n input.guardrailsPassed == true\n input.killSwitch.ready == true\n input.jurisdictionPolicy.satisfied == true\n}",
+ "package gstack.cese\n# Containment & Escalation: trigger graduated containment on systemic-risk breach\ndeny[msg] {\n input.gsrm.systemicRiskPosterior > data.tiers[input.tier].gate\n msg := sprintf(\"GSRM posterior %v exceeds gate for %v -> escalate\", [input.gsrm.systemicRiskPosterior, input.tier])\n}"
+ ],
+ "yaml_artifacts": [
+ "apiVersion: sentinel.gsifi/v2.4\nkind: SovereignGateway\nmetadata:\n name: agi-ingress\nspec:\n mediatedPathOnly: true\n jurisdictionAware: true\n killSwitchLinked: true\n guardrails: opa\n telemetry: gien-pqc-worm",
+ "apiVersion: gstack/v1\nkind: GStackDeployment\nspec:\n layers: [GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame]\n perpetualAssurance: true\n resilience: nis2-dora"
+ ],
+ "tla_snippets": [
+ "---- MODULE SentinelKillSwitch ----\nVARIABLES state\nKillReachable == <>(state = \"contained\")\nSafe == [](state # \"unsafe_terminal\")\nTHEOREM Spec => (Safe /\\ KillReachable)\n===="
+ ],
+ "coq_snippets": [
+ "Theorem replay_determinism : forall log,\n well_formed log -> replay log = canonical_decisions log.\nProof. (* discharged; anchored in PQC WORM *) Qed."
+ ],
+ "openapi_snippets": [
+ "paths:\n /api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/gstack-layers:\n get: { summary: List G-Stack layers, responses: { '200': { description: OK } } }"
+ ]
+ },
+ "kpis": {
+ "Sentinel-GuardrailCoverage": ">=0.98 by 2027 (continuous)",
+ "GIEN-TelemetryCompleteness": "1.0 (continuous)",
+ "SovereignGateway-Enforcement": "1.0 (per request)",
+ "KillSwitch-DrillPass": "1.0 (quarterly)",
+ "PQC-WORM-Integrity": "1.0 (continuous)",
+ "TLAPlus-ModelCheckPass": "1.0 (per merge)",
+ "Coq-ProofObligationsClosed": ">=0.98 (per release)",
+ "OPA-PolicyVerifyPass": "1.0 (per policy release)",
+ "zkSNARK-CASSPP-VerifyRate": "1.0 (per promotion)",
+ "AdaptiveMechanism-VerifyRate": ">=0.95 (per adaptation)",
+ "GStack-PerpetualAssurance": ">=0.99 (continuous)",
+ "FailureSurface-Coverage": ">=0.90 (quarterly)",
+ "StressTest-Pass": ">=0.95 (quarterly)",
+ "Jurisdiction-GreenAtGate": ">=0.95 (per request)"
+ },
+ "riskControlMatrix": [
+ {
+ "risk": "Unmediated AGI/ASI access",
+ "control": "Sovereign API Gateway as sole mediated path + OPA guardrails",
+ "owner": "CTO / CISO",
+ "evidence": "Gateway + guardrail decision logs"
+ },
+ {
+ "risk": "Loss of control / no containment",
+ "control": "Hardware kill switch (TLA+-proven reachability) + CESE escalation",
+ "owner": "CISO / Safety Lead",
+ "evidence": "TLA+ proof + drill records"
+ },
+ {
+ "risk": "Audit tampering / non-repudiation gap",
+ "control": "PQC WORM telemetry (append-only, hash-chained, PQC-signed)",
+ "owner": "CISO / Internal Audit",
+ "evidence": "WORM integrity + replay reports"
+ },
+ {
+ "risk": "Faulty / conflicting policy",
+ "control": "OPA/Rego formal verification suite as CI gate",
+ "owner": "Head of Policy",
+ "evidence": "Verification suite results"
+ },
+ {
+ "risk": "Unverifiable staged promotion",
+ "control": "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit",
+ "owner": "CRO / Safety",
+ "evidence": "Verifier-accepted proofs"
+ },
+ {
+ "risk": "Adaptive mechanism drifts unsafe",
+ "control": "Runtime monitors + re-proof + rollback",
+ "owner": "CDAO",
+ "evidence": "Re-proof + rollback logs"
+ },
+ {
+ "risk": "Systemic / contagion event",
+ "control": "GSRM + GIEN systemic-risk coordination + graduated containment",
+ "owner": "CRO",
+ "evidence": "GSRM posteriors + containment actions"
+ },
+ {
+ "risk": "Operational-resilience failure (ICT)",
+ "control": "GROP + NIS2/DORA controls (third-party, incident, testing)",
+ "owner": "COO / CISO",
+ "evidence": "DORA resilience evidence"
+ },
+ {
+ "risk": "Cross-jurisdiction non-compliance",
+ "control": "Jurisdiction-aware strictest-applicable routing + anticipatory deltas",
+ "owner": "CCO",
+ "evidence": "Jurisdiction resolution audit"
+ },
+ {
+ "risk": "Assurance decay over decades",
+ "control": "Perpetual assurance protocols + lifecycle-integrity reporting + crypto-agility",
+ "owner": "GEA / Board",
+ "evidence": "Signed integrity reports"
+ }
+ ],
+ "traceability": [
+ {
+ "from": "Sentinel v2.4 (M1)",
+ "to": "EU AI Act Art. 12/14 / NIST Manage",
+ "via": "GIEN telemetry + guardrail logs"
+ },
+ {
+ "from": "Zero-trust + PQC WORM (M2)",
+ "to": "EU AI Act Art. 12 / NIS2 / DORA",
+ "via": "Append-only signed audit"
+ },
+ {
+ "from": "Formal verification (M3)",
+ "to": "SR 11-7 / NIST Measure",
+ "via": "TLA+/Coq/OPA/zk artifacts"
+ },
+ {
+ "from": "G-Stack (M4)",
+ "to": "EU AI Act systemic-risk / ISO 42001",
+ "via": "Layered assurance + GEA attestation"
+ },
+ {
+ "from": "Stress-testing (M5)",
+ "to": "DORA threat-led testing / SR 11-7",
+ "via": "Stress-test + failure-surface reports"
+ },
+ {
+ "from": "Perpetual assurance (M6)",
+ "to": "ISO 42001 improvement / Basel op-risk",
+ "via": "Lifecycle-integrity reports"
+ },
+ {
+ "from": "Jurisdiction compliance (M7)",
+ "to": "All regimes (multipolar)",
+ "via": "Supervisory artifacts + zk proofs"
+ }
+ ],
+ "dataFlows": [
+ {
+ "flow": "Request -> Sovereign API Gateway -> OPA guardrails -> allow/deny -> GIEN event -> PQC WORM"
+ },
+ {
+ "flow": "GIEN events -> GIEN systemic-risk coordinator + GSRM -> systemic-risk posterior"
+ },
+ {
+ "flow": "CAS-SPP promotion records -> zk-SNARK circuit -> verifier -> PQC WORM anchor"
+ },
+ {
+ "flow": "Adaptive update -> invariant monitor -> re-proof trigger -> allow or rollback"
+ },
+ {
+ "flow": "G-Stack assurance evidence -> GEA -> signed attestation -> supervisory artifact / zk proof"
+ }
+ ],
+ "regulators": [
+ {
+ "name": "EU AI Office",
+ "scope": "EU AI Act 2024/1689, Annex IV, GPAI systemic risk"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "ESAs (EBA/ESMA/EIOPA)",
+ "scope": "DORA oversight, ICT third-party risk"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "ECB / SSM",
+ "scope": "Prudential supervision, internal models"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "Federal Reserve / OCC",
+ "scope": "SR 11-7 model risk management"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "NIST",
+ "scope": "AI RMF 1.0, AI 600-1 GenAI profile"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42",
+ "scope": "ISO/IEC 42001 AI management systems"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "FCA / PRA",
+ "scope": "SMCR, Consumer Duty, Basel III/IV (UK)"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "MAS",
+ "scope": "FEAT principles"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "HKMA",
+ "scope": "FEAT-aligned AI governance"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "EDPB / DPAs",
+ "scope": "GDPR Arts. 5, 22, 35 (DPIA)"
+ }
+ ],
+ "rollout90": [
+ {
+ "day": "0-15",
+ "task": "Deploy Sovereign API Gateway + OPA guardrails in shadow; stand up GIEN telemetry."
+ },
+ {
+ "day": "15-30",
+ "task": "Enable PQC WORM telemetry on zero-trust K8s/Kafka backbone; SPIFFE/SPIRE identities."
+ },
+ {
+ "day": "30-45",
+ "task": "Install hardware kill switch; prove reachability in TLA+; first containment drill."
+ },
+ {
+ "day": "45-60",
+ "task": "Bring OPA/Rego verification suite + Coq replay-determinism into CI gates."
+ },
+ {
+ "day": "60-75",
+ "task": "Stand up first G-Stack layers (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE); wire GSRM."
+ },
+ {
+ "day": "75-90",
+ "task": "Run first stress test + simulation; publish lifecycle-integrity baseline to board/regulator."
+ }
+ ],
+ "evidencePack": [
+ "Sentinel v2.4 deployment topology + guardrail/gateway decision logs",
+ "GIEN telemetry completeness reports (signed)",
+ "Hardware kill-switch TLA+ proof + quarterly drill records",
+ "PQC WORM integrity & deterministic-replay reports",
+ "TLA+/Coq proof artifacts + OPA verification suite results",
+ "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP audit proof bundles + verifier results",
+ "G-Stack layer assurance attestations (GEA-signed)",
+ "Stress-test reports + failure-surface compendium",
+ "Lifecycle-integrity reports + perpetual-assurance evidence-freshness logs",
+ "Jurisdiction-aware supervisory artifacts (Annex IV / SR 11-7 / DORA / FEAT)"
+ ],
+ "executiveSummary": {
+ "headline": "WP-065 designs Sentinel AI v2.4 as the mediated control plane and the G-Stack as a ten-layer, multi-decade civilizational-assurance architecture for AGI/ASI in G-SIFIs — formally verified, cryptographically audited, stress-tested and jurisdiction-aware for a multipolar 2026-2030 world.",
+ "scope": "Sentinel v2.4 stack, zero-trust backbone, formal verification (TLA+/Coq/OPA/zk-SNARK CAS-SPP), the G-Stack (GAIRDS/GRI/CEE/NSNs/CESE/GROP/GHP/GSRM/GEA/Meta-Endgame), stress-testing/perpetual assurance, and jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance aligned to EU AI Act 2024/1689 (Annex IV), NIST RMF/600-1, ISO 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer Duty/SMCR and MAS/HKMA FEAT.",
+ "investment": "$220M-$390M over five years (multi-decade assurance, risk-adjusted, G-SIFI scale).",
+ "targetIndices": "Guardrail coverage >=0.98; PQC WORM integrity 1.0; TLA+/OPA verify 1.0; zk-SNARK CAS-SPP 1.0; perpetual assurance >=0.99.",
+ "recommendation": "Approve the phased 2026-2030 programme: deploy Sentinel v2.4 + zero-trust backbone first, then the formal-verification regime, then the G-Stack assurance layers and perpetual assurance — ensuring verification and containment always precede frontier capability.",
+ "differentiators": [
+ "Single mediated AGI/ASI path via the Sovereign API Gateway with deny-by-default OPA guardrails",
+ "TLA+-proven hardware kill switch and PQC WORM deterministic-replay audit",
+ "zk-SNARK cryptographic audit of CAS-SPP staged promotion",
+ "Ten-layer G-Stack with a Meta-Endgame civilizational-governance apex",
+ "Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance for a multipolar regulatory world"
+ ]
+ },
+ "counts": {
+ "modules": 8,
+ "sections": 28,
+ "sentinelComponents": 8,
+ "gstackLayers": 10,
+ "verificationArtifacts": 7,
+ "failureSurfaces": 8,
+ "jurisdictions": 6,
+ "reportSections": 5,
+ "kpis": 14,
+ "riskControlMatrix": 10,
+ "traceability": 7,
+ "dataFlows": 5,
+ "regulators": 10,
+ "rollout90": 6,
+ "evidencePack": 10,
+ "indices": 14
+ }
+}
diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030-html.py b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030-html.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..84076002
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030-html.py
@@ -0,0 +1,282 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""WP-065 HTML renderer — Sentinel v2.4 + G-Stack civilizational-assurance blueprint."""
+import json
+from pathlib import Path
+from html import escape
+
+ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent
+SRC = ROOT / "data" / "sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json"
+OUT = ROOT / "public" / "sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html"
+OUT.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
+DOC = json.loads(SRC.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
+
+
+def e(x):
+ return escape(str(x))
+
+
+SKIP = (
+ "mid", "sid", "scid", "glid", "vaid", "fsid", "jrid", "rsid",
+ "title", "abstract", "content", "component", "plane", "layer",
+ "tier", "artifact", "method", "property", "statement", "surface",
+ "dimension", "jurisdiction",
+)
+
+
+def kv_pairs(d, skip=SKIP):
+ parts = []
+ for k, v in d.items():
+ if k in skip:
+ continue
+ if isinstance(v, list):
+ inner = "".join(
+ f"<li>{e(x) if not isinstance(x, dict) else e(json.dumps(x))}</li>"
+ for x in v
+ )
+ parts.append(f"<div class='kv'><b>{e(k)}</b><ul>{inner}</ul></div>")
+ elif isinstance(v, dict):
+ inner = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(kk)}</b>: {e(vv)}</li>" for kk, vv in v.items())
+ parts.append(f"<div class='kv'><b>{e(k)}</b><ul>{inner}</ul></div>")
+ else:
+ parts.append(f"<div class='kv'><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</div>")
+ return "".join(parts)
+
+
+def section_html(s):
+ return f"<div class='sec'><h4>{e(s['sid'])}. {e(s['title'])}</h4>{kv_pairs(s)}</div>"
+
+
+def module_html(m):
+ secs = "".join(section_html(s) for s in m["sections"])
+ purpose = m.get("purpose") or ""
+ return (
+ f"<section class='module' id='{e(m['mid'])}'>"
+ f"<h3>{e(m['mid'])} — {e(m['title'])}</h3>"
+ f"<p class='sum'>{e(purpose)}</p>{secs}</section>"
+ )
+
+
+def list_array(arr, label_keys, anchor, title):
+ rows = []
+ for it in arr:
+ head_parts = [e(it.get(label_keys[0], ""))] + [e(it.get(k, "")) for k in label_keys[1:]]
+ head = " · ".join(p for p in head_parts if p)
+ rows.append(f"<div class='card'><div class='card-head'>{head}</div>{kv_pairs(it)}</div>")
+ return f"<section id='{anchor}'><h3>{title} ({len(arr)})</h3>{''.join(rows)}</section>"
+
+
+distinctive = [
+ ("sentinelComponents", "sentinel-components", "Sentinel v2.4 Components (M1)", ["scid", "component", "plane"]),
+ ("gstackLayers", "gstack-layers", "G-Stack Layers (M4)", ["glid", "layer", "tier"]),
+ ("verificationArtifacts", "verification-artifacts", "Formal Verification Artifacts (M3)", ["vaid", "artifact", "method"]),
+ ("failureSurfaces", "failure-surfaces", "Failure-Surface Compendium (M5)", ["fsid", "surface", "dimension"]),
+ ("jurisdictions", "jurisdictions", "Jurisdiction-Aware Compliance (M7)", ["jrid", "jurisdiction"]),
+]
+
+
+toc_modules = "".join(
+ f"<li><a href='#{e(m['mid'])}'>{e(m['mid'])} — {e(m['title'])}</a></li>"
+ for m in DOC["modules"]
+)
+toc_distinct = "".join(
+ f"<li><a href='#{anchor}'>{e(label)}</a></li>"
+ for _, anchor, label, _ in distinctive
+)
+
+modules_html = "".join(module_html(m) for m in DOC["modules"])
+distinctive_html = "".join(
+ list_array(DOC[key], keys, anchor, label)
+ for key, anchor, label, keys in distinctive
+)
+
+
+def table_rows(rows, cols):
+ head = "".join(f"<th>{e(c)}</th>" for c in cols)
+ body = "".join("<tr>" + "".join(f"<td>{e(r.get(c, ''))}</td>" for c in cols) + "</tr>" for r in rows)
+ return f"<table><thead><tr>{head}</tr></thead><tbody>{body}</tbody></table>"
+
+
+def table_dict(d, key_label, val_label="value"):
+ head = f"<tr><th>{e(key_label)}</th><th>{e(val_label)}</th></tr>"
+ rows = []
+ for k, v in d.items():
+ if isinstance(v, dict):
+ vstr = "; ".join(f"{kk}={vv}" for kk, vv in v.items())
+ elif isinstance(v, list):
+ vstr = "; ".join(json.dumps(x) if isinstance(x, dict) else str(x) for x in v)
+ else:
+ vstr = str(v)
+ rows.append(f"<tr><td>{e(k)}</td><td>{e(vstr)}</td></tr>")
+ return f"<table><thead>{head}</thead><tbody>{''.join(rows)}</tbody></table>"
+
+
+report_full_html = (
+ "<section id='report-sections-full'><h3>Whitepaper Sections — <title> / <abstract> / <content></h3>"
+ + "".join(
+ f"<div class='card'><div class='card-head'>{e(rs['rsid'])} · {e(rs['title'])}</div>"
+ f"<div class='kv'><b>abstract</b>: {e(rs['abstract'])}</div>"
+ f"<div class='kv'><b>content</b>: {e(rs['content'])}</div></div>"
+ for rs in DOC["reportSections"]
+ )
+ + "</section>"
+)
+
+schemas_html = f"<section id='schemas'><h3>Schemas ({len(DOC['schemas'])})</h3>{table_dict(DOC['schemas'], 'schema', 'fields')}</section>"
+code_html = (
+ "<section id='code'><h3>Code & Artifacts (Rego / YAML / TLA+ / Coq / OpenAPI)</h3>"
+ + "".join(
+ f"<div class='kv'><b>{e(k)}</b><ul>" + "".join(f"<li><pre>{e(item)}</pre></li>" for item in v) + "</ul></div>"
+ for k, v in DOC["code"].items()
+ )
+ + "</section>"
+)
+kpis_html = f"<section id='kpis'><h3>KPIs / Indices ({len(DOC['kpis'])})</h3>{table_dict(DOC['kpis'], 'index', 'target/cadence')}</section>"
+rcm_html = f"<section id='rcm'><h3>Risk Control Matrix ({len(DOC['riskControlMatrix'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['riskControlMatrix'], ['risk','control','owner','evidence'])}</section>"
+trace_html = f"<section id='trace'><h3>Traceability ({len(DOC['traceability'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['traceability'], ['from','to','via'])}</section>"
+flows_html = f"<section id='data-flows'><h3>Data Flows ({len(DOC['dataFlows'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['dataFlows'], ['flow'])}</section>"
+regs_html = f"<section id='regulators'><h3>Regulators ({len(DOC['regulators'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['regulators'], ['name','scope'])}</section>"
+rollout_html = f"<section id='rollout-90'><h3>90-Day Rollout ({len(DOC['rollout90'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['rollout90'], ['day','task'])}</section>"
+evidence_html = (
+ f"<section id='evidence-pack'><h3>Regulator Evidence Pack ({len(DOC['evidencePack'])})</h3>"
+ + "<ul>" + "".join(f"<li>{e(x)}</li>" for x in DOC["evidencePack"]) + "</ul></section>"
+)
+
+tail_html = schemas_html + code_html + kpis_html + rcm_html + trace_html + flows_html + regs_html + rollout_html + evidence_html
+
+
+exs = DOC["executiveSummary"]
+exec_html = f"""
+<section id='exec'><h3>Executive Summary</h3>
+<p><b>Headline:</b> {e(exs['headline'])}</p>
+<p><b>Scope:</b> {e(exs['scope'])}</p>
+<p><b>Investment:</b> {e(exs['investment'])}</p>
+<p><b>Target Indices:</b> {e(exs['targetIndices'])}</p>
+<p><b>Board Recommendation:</b> {e(exs['recommendation'])}</p>
+<div class='kv'><b>Differentiators</b><ul>{''.join(f'<li>{e(x)}</li>' for x in exs['differentiators'])}</ul></div>
+</section>
+"""
+
+
+directive = DOC["directive"]
+indices_rows = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</li>" for k, v in DOC["indices"].items())
+tier_rows = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</li>" for k, v in DOC["tiers"].items())
+sev_rows = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</li>" for k, v in DOC["severities"].items())
+invest = DOC["investment"]
+invest_breakdown = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</li>" for k, v in invest["breakdown"].items())
+audiences_list = "".join(f"<li>{e(a)}</li>" for a in DOC["audiences"])
+
+meta_html = f"""
+<section id='directive'><h3>Strategic Directive</h3>
+<p><b>Scope:</b> {e(directive['scope'])}</p>
+<div class='kv'><b>Outcomes</b><ul>{''.join(f'<li>{e(x)}</li>' for x in directive['outcomes'])}</ul></div>
+<div class='kv'><b>Do NOT</b><ul>{''.join(f'<li>{e(x)}</li>' for x in directive['doNot'])}</ul></div>
+</section>
+
+<section id='audiences'><h3>Intended Audiences ({len(DOC['audiences'])})</h3><ul>{audiences_list}</ul></section>
+
+<section id='indices'><h3>Performance Indices ({len(DOC['indices'])})</h3><ul>{indices_rows}</ul></section>
+
+<section id='tiers'><h3>Autonomy / Assurance Tiers</h3><ul>{tier_rows}</ul></section>
+
+<section id='severities'><h3>Severity Levels</h3><ul>{sev_rows}</ul></section>
+
+<section id='investment'><h3>Investment Envelope</h3>
+<p><b>Total Range:</b> {e(invest['totalRange'])} · <b>Window:</b> {e(invest['programWindow'])} · <b>Currency:</b> {e(invest['currency'])}</p>
+<div class='kv'><b>Breakdown</b><ul>{invest_breakdown}</ul></div>
+</section>
+"""
+
+
+html = f"""<!doctype html>
+<html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8">
+<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
+<title>{e(DOC['title'])}
+
+
+
+{e(DOC['title'])}
+docRef {e(DOC['docRef'])} · v{e(DOC['version'])} · {e(DOC['status'])}
+{e(DOC['classification'])}
+Horizon: {e(DOC['horizon'])} · API prefix: {e(DOC['apiPrefix'])} · builds on {' · '.join(e(b) for b in DOC['buildsOn'])}
+
+{''.join(f"{v} {e(k)}" for k,v in DOC['counts'].items())}
+
+
+
+
+
+{exec_html}
+{meta_html}
+{modules_html}
+{distinctive_html}
+{report_full_html}
+{tail_html}
+
+