From 57403c10bd30a5adcdd0f5238fa722ee4987c306 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=F0=9D=90=8E=F0=9D=90=A7=F0=9D=90=9E=20=F0=9D=90=85?= =?UTF-8?q?=F0=9D=90=A2=F0=9D=90=A7=F0=9D=90=9E=20=F0=9D=90=92=F0=9D=90=AD?= =?UTF-8?q?=F0=9D=90=9A=F0=9D=90=AB=F0=9D=90=AC=F0=9D=90=AD=F0=9D=90=AE?= =?UTF-8?q?=F0=9D=90=9F=F0=9D=90=9F?= Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 12:43:39 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] feat(WP-065): Sentinel AI v2.4 & G-Stack civilizational-assurance architecture for AGI/ASI governance in G-SIFIs (2026-2030) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Adds WP-065 — a 2026-2030 technical & governance analysis/design blueprint covering four areas requested for AGI/ASI governance in G-SIFIs: (1) Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFI deployment — OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway, hardware kill switch, zero-trust Kubernetes/Kafka/OPA backbone, PQC WORM telemetry, GIEN systemic-risk coordination (8 sentinelComponents). (2) Formal verification — TLA+/Coq, OPA/Rego policy verification, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification (7 verificationArtifacts). (3) Multi-decade regulator-grade civilizational-assurance stack — the 10-layer G-Stack (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame) with stress-test frameworks, failure-surface compendia (8 failureSurfaces), simulation frameworks, lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual-assurance protocols (10 gstackLayers). (4) Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance & supervisory artifacts — EU AI Act 2024/1689 Annex IV, NIST AI RMF 1.0/600-1, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer Duty/SMCR, MAS/HKMA FEAT across a multipolar world (6 jurisdictions). Implementation: - gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.py — reproducible data generator (8 modules; collections sentinelComponents/gstackLayers/verificationArtifacts/ failureSurfaces/jurisdictions/reportSections; KPIs, RCM, traceability, data-flows, regulators, 90-day rollout, evidence pack; trailing newline). - gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030-html.py — reproducible dark-theme renderer. - data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json + public/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html (both byte-identical on regeneration). - server.js — page route /sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030 + 24 API endpoints under /api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030 (collections with :id 200/404 + regulators/:name); registered WP-065 in governance-index Pillar P9 (module, report ref, strategicSynthesis2030 dashboard) and bumped platformStats (endpoints 700->724, dataObjects 25->26, reports 22->23, dashboards 37->38). docRef: SENTINEL-GSTACK-GSIFI-2030-WP-065. Builds on WP-060/061/062/063/064. Verified: node --check OK, all endpoints 200, :id 200/404 correct, zero console errors on the rendered page. --- .../data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json | 1062 +++++++++++++++++ .../gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030-html.py | 282 +++++ .../gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.py | 402 +++++++ .../public/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html | 153 +++ rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js | 133 ++- 5 files changed, 2021 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) create mode 100644 rag-agentic-dashboard/data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json create mode 100644 rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030-html.py create mode 100644 rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.py create mode 100644 rag-agentic-dashboard/public/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json b/rag-agentic-dashboard/data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..93057f16 --- /dev/null +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json @@ -0,0 +1,1062 @@ +{ + "docRef": "SENTINEL-GSTACK-GSIFI-2030-WP-065", + "version": "1.0.0", + "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 & G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture for AGI/ASI Governance in G-SIFIs — 2026-2030 Technical & Governance Analysis and Design", + "horizon": "2026-2030", + "apiPrefix": "/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030", + "buildsOn": [ + "WP-060", + "WP-061", + "WP-062", + "WP-063", + "WP-064" + ], + "status": "platform-and-civilizational-assurance-design", + "classification": "Confidential / Restricted — Board, CEO, CRO, CCO, CISO, CDAO, CTO, Enterprise Architects, AI Platform Engineers, AI Safety Researchers, Model Risk, Internal Audit, External Regulators & Supervisory Colleges", + "audiences": [ + "Board & Board Technology/Risk Committees", + "C-Suite (CEO, CRO, CCO, CISO, CDAO, CTO)", + "Enterprise Architects & AI Platform Engineers", + "AI Safety & Alignment Researchers", + "Model Risk Management & Independent Validation", + "Internal Audit & SMCR Accountable Executives", + "External Regulators & Supervisory Colleges" + ], + "directive": { + "scope": "Provide the technical and governance analysis and design for (1) the Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFI deployment, (2) its formal-verification regime (TLA+/Coq, OPA/Rego, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification), (3) the multi-decade, regulator-grade G-Stack civilizational-assurance architecture (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame) with stress-testing, failure-surface compendia, simulation, lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance, and (4) jurisdiction-aware, anticipatory compliance and supervisory artifacts aligned to EU AI Act 2024/1689 Annex IV, NIST AI RMF 1.0/600-1, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer Duty/SMCR and MAS/HKMA FEAT in a multipolar 2026-2030 world.", + "outcomes": [ + "Sentinel v2.4 deployed across material AI with OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway and hardware kill switch by 2027", + "Zero-trust K8s/Kafka/OPA backbone with PQC WORM telemetry operational by 2027", + "Formal-verification regime (TLA+/Coq + OPA/Rego + zk-SNARK CAS-SPP) gating frontier promotion by 2028", + "G-Stack civilizational-assurance layers operational with perpetual assurance protocols by 2029", + "Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance artifacts auto-emitted to supervisory colleges by 2029" + ], + "doNot": [ + "Do NOT route any AGI/ASI-class request outside the Sovereign API Gateway + OPA guardrails", + "Do NOT operate without PQC WORM telemetry and a tested hardware kill switch", + "Do NOT promote a frontier system with a failing TLA+/Coq proof or unverified adaptive mechanism", + "Do NOT disable perpetual assurance monitoring or lifecycle-integrity reporting", + "Do NOT assume single-jurisdiction compliance in a multipolar regulatory world" + ] + }, + "indices": { + "Sentinel-GuardrailCoverage": ">=0.98 (decisions through OPA guardrails)", + "GIEN-TelemetryCompleteness": "1.0 (governance-instrumented event coverage)", + "SovereignGateway-PolicyEnforcement": "1.0 (requests policy-checked at gateway)", + "KillSwitch-Readiness": "1.0 (hardware kill switch verified & drilled)", + "ZeroTrust-mTLSCoverage": ">=0.99 (service-to-service mTLS / SPIFFE)", + "PQC-WORM-Integrity": "1.0 (post-quantum-signed append-only telemetry)", + "TLAPlus-ModelCheckPass": "1.0 (temporal safety/liveness per merge)", + "Coq-ProofObligationsClosed": ">=0.98 (discharged obligations)", + "OPA-PolicyVerifyPass": "1.0 (Rego policy verification suite)", + "zkSNARK-CASSPP-VerifyRate": "1.0 (CAS-SPP audit proofs accepted)", + "AdaptiveMechanism-VerifyRate": ">=0.95 (verified adaptive updates)", + "GStack-PerpetualAssurance": ">=0.99 (continuous assurance uptime)", + "FailureSurface-Coverage": ">=0.90 (catalogued vs modeled failure surfaces)", + "Jurisdiction-CompliancePosture": ">=0.95 (jurisdictions green at gate)" + }, + "tiers": { + "T0-Lab": "Containment lab only; Sentinel shadow; no production routing.", + "T1-Assisted": "Human-in-the-loop; gateway + guardrails; GIEN telemetry on.", + "T2-Supervised": "Material decisions; full formal verification; PQC WORM.", + "T3-Autonomous-Constrained": "Bounded autonomy; zk-SNARK CAS-SPP; G-Stack assurance.", + "T4-Frontier-Class": "AGI/ASI-grade; Meta-Endgame governance; treaty-aligned; quorum kill switch." + }, + "severities": { + "S1-Systemic": "Civilizational/systemic loss-of-control potential; Meta-Endgame + regulator + containment.", + "S2-Severe": "Material prudential/consumer harm; CRO + SMCR exec; halt + remediate.", + "S3-Elevated": "Localized harm or control gap; model owner + MRM; mitigate within SLA.", + "S4-Routine": "Drift/quality deviation; automated rollback + ticket." + }, + "investment": { + "currency": "USD", + "programWindow": "2026-2030 (5 years; perpetual-assurance steady state beyond)", + "totalRange": "$220M-$390M (G-SIFI scale; multi-decade assurance, risk-adjusted)", + "breakdown": { + "Sentinel v2.4 platform (gateway, GIEN, guardrails, kill switch)": "$55M-$95M", + "Zero-trust backbone (K8s/Kafka/OPA, PQC WORM, SPIFFE)": "$35M-$60M", + "Formal verification (TLA+/Coq, OPA verify, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP)": "$45M-$80M", + "G-Stack civilizational assurance (10 layers, simulation, perpetual assurance)": "$50M-$90M", + "Jurisdiction-aware compliance & supervisory artifacts": "$20M-$35M", + "Governance, stress-testing, training & assurance ops": "$15M-$30M" + } + }, + "modules": [ + { + "mid": "M1", + "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack", + "purpose": "The institutional control plane for G-SIFI AGI/ASI: OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway, hardware kill switch, and GIEN systemic-risk coordination — the single mediated path for all governed AI traffic.", + "sections": [ + { + "sid": "M1.1", + "title": "OPA guardrails", + "description": "Inline policy guardrails evaluating every request/decision against regulatory and internal Rego policies before execution.", + "controls": [ + "Deny-by-default", + "Policy versioned in CI", + "Decision logs to PQC WORM" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M1.2", + "title": "GIEN telemetry", + "description": "Governance-Instrumented Event Network: structured, signed telemetry of every governed decision, gate and override for observability and systemic-risk coordination.", + "controls": [ + "Complete event coverage", + "Signed events", + "Systemic-risk feed" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M1.3", + "title": "Sovereign API Gateway", + "description": "The sole mediated ingress/egress for AGI/ASI-class capabilities; enforces identity, policy, rate, jurisdiction and containment posture.", + "controls": [ + "Single mediated path", + "Jurisdiction-aware routing", + "Containment-aware throttling" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M1.4", + "title": "Hardware kill switch", + "description": "Quorum-authorized physical + logical kill switch with proven reachability (TLA+) and quarterly drills.", + "controls": [ + "Quorum (n-of-m)", + "TLA+ reachability proof", + "Quarterly drill" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M1.5", + "title": "GIEN systemic-risk coordination", + "description": "Cross-system coordination using GIEN feeds to detect correlated/contagion behavior and trigger graduated containment.", + "controls": [ + "Correlation detection", + "Graduated containment", + "Regulator notify hooks" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M2", + "title": "Zero-Trust Backbone — Kubernetes / Kafka / OPA + PQC WORM", + "purpose": "The runtime substrate beneath Sentinel v2.4: a zero-trust Kubernetes/Kafka/OPA backbone with post-quantum-signed WORM telemetry providing tamper-evident, deterministically replayable audit.", + "sections": [ + { + "sid": "M2.1", + "title": "Zero-trust service mesh", + "description": "SPIFFE/SPIRE identities and mTLS for all service-to-service traffic; no implicit trust.", + "controls": [ + "SPIFFE/SPIRE identity", + "mTLS everywhere", + "Per-tier namespace isolation" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M2.2", + "title": "Kafka event backbone", + "description": "Governed Kafka topics with ACLs carry GIEN telemetry and audit events at scale.", + "controls": [ + "ACL governance", + "Schema registry", + "Topic-level retention policy" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M2.3", + "title": "OPA policy plane", + "description": "Centralized OPA evaluates admission and decision-time policy; integrates with Sentinel guardrails.", + "controls": [ + "Admission webhooks", + "Decision logging", + "Policy unit tests" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M2.4", + "title": "PQC WORM telemetry", + "description": "Append-only, hash-chained, post-quantum-signed (e.g., ML-DSA) write-once telemetry enabling deterministic replay.", + "controls": [ + "Append-only", + "PQC signatures", + "Deterministic replay (DRI)" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M3", + "title": "Formal Verification & Cryptographic Audit", + "purpose": "Machine-checked assurance for Sentinel and G-Stack: TLA+/Coq proofs, OPA/Rego policy verification, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, and verification of dynamic adaptive mechanisms.", + "sections": [ + { + "sid": "M3.1", + "title": "TLA+/Coq proofs", + "description": "Temporal safety/liveness (TLA+: kill-switch reachability, no-unsafe-terminal) and deductive correctness (Coq: policy-monotonicity, audit-completeness, replay-determinism).", + "controls": [ + "Model-check in CI", + "Proof obligations closed", + "Versioned with code" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M3.2", + "title": "OPA/Rego policy verification", + "description": "Formal verification of Rego policies (coverage, conflict-freedom, regulatory-mapping completeness) as a CI gate.", + "controls": [ + "Coverage proofs", + "Conflict detection", + "Reg-mapping completeness" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M3.3", + "title": "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit", + "description": "Zero-knowledge proofs over CAS-SPP staged-promotion records: prove containment-gate compliance and audit integrity without disclosing internals.", + "controls": [ + "Circuit per gate statement", + "Verifier-accepted proofs", + "Anchored in PQC WORM" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M3.4", + "title": "Dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification", + "description": "Verify that online-learning / self-modifying / adaptive mechanisms preserve bound invariants across updates (runtime monitors + re-proof triggers).", + "controls": [ + "Invariant-preserving updates", + "Re-proof on adaptation", + "Rollback on violation" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M4", + "title": "G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture", + "purpose": "A multi-decade, regulator-grade civilizational-assurance architecture composed of ten named layers, from data substrate to the Meta-Endgame governance apex, designed for frontier and AGI/ASI systems in a multipolar world.", + "sections": [ + { + "sid": "M4.1", + "title": "G-Stack overview", + "description": "Ten composable layers (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame) providing defense-in-depth from data integrity to civilizational endgame governance.", + "controls": [ + "Layered defense-in-depth", + "Each layer independently assured", + "Meta-Endgame apex authority" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M4.2", + "title": "Substrate & registry layers", + "description": "GAIRDS (data substrate), GRI (registry/index), CEE (compliance/evaluation engine) provide the assured foundation.", + "controls": [ + "Data integrity gates", + "Authoritative registry", + "Continuous evaluation" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M4.3", + "title": "Network & sentinel layers", + "description": "NSNs (networked sentinel nodes), CESE (containment/escalation sentinel engine), GROP (resilience/operations protocol).", + "controls": [ + "Distributed sentinels", + "Escalation engine", + "Resilience protocol" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M4.4", + "title": "Health, systemic-risk & endgame layers", + "description": "GHP (health protocol), GSRM (systemic-risk monitor), GEA (assurance authority), Meta-Endgame (apex civilizational governance).", + "controls": [ + "Continuous health checks", + "Systemic-risk monitoring", + "Apex endgame controls" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M5", + "title": "Stress-Testing, Failure Surfaces & Simulation", + "purpose": "Adversarial stress-test frameworks, a failure-surface compendium, and simulation frameworks that exercise Sentinel + G-Stack under crisis to evidence resilience for regulators.", + "sections": [ + { + "sid": "M5.1", + "title": "Stress-test frameworks", + "description": "Scenario libraries (flash-crash, deceptive-alignment, coordinated-agent, supply-chain compromise, jurisdictional fragmentation) run against the live stack.", + "controls": [ + "Quarterly stress tests", + "Severity-tiered scenarios", + "Findings -> assurance backlog" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M5.2", + "title": "Failure-surface compendium", + "description": "A maintained catalogue of failure surfaces across data, model, policy, infra, crypto, governance and cross-jurisdiction dimensions, each with detection and mitigation.", + "controls": [ + "Catalogued surfaces", + "Detection + mitigation per surface", + "Coverage tracking" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M5.3", + "title": "Simulation frameworks", + "description": "Digital-twin and Monte-Carlo simulation of Sentinel/G-Stack behavior and systemic contagion, feeding Bayesian systemic-risk estimates.", + "controls": [ + "Digital-twin sims", + "Monte-Carlo contagion", + "BBN evidence feed" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M6", + "title": "Lifecycle Integrity & Perpetual Assurance", + "purpose": "Lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance protocols ensuring the stack remains trustworthy across a multi-decade horizon, not just at deployment.", + "sections": [ + { + "sid": "M6.1", + "title": "Lifecycle-integrity reporting", + "description": "Continuous attestation across build -> deploy -> operate -> adapt -> retire, with signed integrity reports for boards and regulators.", + "controls": [ + "Per-stage attestation", + "Signed integrity reports", + "Drift-from-baseline alerts" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M6.2", + "title": "Perpetual assurance protocols", + "description": "Always-on assurance: continuous re-verification, evidence freshness SLAs, and automatic re-proof on change or environmental shift.", + "controls": [ + "Continuous re-verification", + "Evidence freshness SLA", + "Auto re-proof triggers" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M6.3", + "title": "Multi-decade governance continuity", + "description": "Crypto-agility, key-rotation, standard-version migration and institutional-memory protocols to sustain assurance over decades.", + "controls": [ + "Crypto-agility", + "Standard-migration runbooks", + "Institutional-memory archive" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M7", + "title": "Jurisdiction-Aware Anticipatory Compliance & Supervisory Artifacts", + "purpose": "Compliance that anticipates regulatory divergence in a multipolar world and emits machine-readable supervisory artifacts mapped per jurisdiction.", + "sections": [ + { + "sid": "M7.1", + "title": "Jurisdiction-aware policy routing", + "description": "Sovereign API Gateway + OPA select the strictest applicable jurisdictional policy per request; conflicts resolved conservatively.", + "controls": [ + "Per-jurisdiction policy sets", + "Strictest-applicable resolution", + "Routing audit" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M7.2", + "title": "Anticipatory compliance", + "description": "Horizon-scanning of pending rules (e.g., evolving GPAI/systemic-risk guidance) with pre-built control deltas activated on adoption.", + "controls": [ + "Regulatory horizon scan", + "Pre-built control deltas", + "Activation runbooks" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M7.3", + "title": "Supervisory artifact design", + "description": "Auto-generated Annex-IV dossiers, SR 11-7 packs, DORA resilience evidence and FEAT/Consumer-Duty artifacts, with zk-SNARK proofs where IP-sensitive.", + "controls": [ + "Annex IV / SR 11-7 / DORA packs", + "zk proofs for IP-sensitive", + "Supervisory-college export" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "M7.4", + "title": "Operational-resilience alignment (NIS2/DORA)", + "description": "ICT third-party risk, incident reporting, threat-led testing and resilience evidence mapped to NIS2 and DORA.", + "controls": [ + "ICT third-party register", + "Incident reporting SLA", + "Threat-led pen testing" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M8", + "title": "Regulator-Ready Report Sections", + "purpose": "Board- and regulator-facing narrative sections rendered with /<abstract>/<content> for direct inclusion in supervisory dossiers.", + "sections": [ + { + "sid": "M8.1", + "title": "Report section index", + "description": "Five whitepaper sections covering Sentinel v2.4, formal verification, the G-Stack, stress-testing/perpetual assurance, and jurisdiction-aware compliance.", + "controls": [ + "Sections versioned", + "Board-reviewed", + "Regulator-ready" + ] + } + ] + } + ], + "sentinelComponents": [ + { + "scid": "SEN-01", + "component": "OPA Guardrails", + "plane": "policy", + "function": "Inline deny-by-default policy evaluation on every governed request/decision.", + "killSwitchLinked": true + }, + { + "scid": "SEN-02", + "component": "GIEN Telemetry", + "plane": "observability", + "function": "Signed governance-instrumented event network for full decision observability.", + "killSwitchLinked": false + }, + { + "scid": "SEN-03", + "component": "Sovereign API Gateway", + "plane": "ingress", + "function": "Sole mediated, jurisdiction-aware path for AGI/ASI-class capabilities.", + "killSwitchLinked": true + }, + { + "scid": "SEN-04", + "component": "Hardware Kill Switch", + "plane": "containment", + "function": "Quorum-authorized physical+logical halt with TLA+-proven reachability.", + "killSwitchLinked": true + }, + { + "scid": "SEN-05", + "component": "GIEN Systemic-Risk Coordinator", + "plane": "systemic-risk", + "function": "Cross-system contagion detection and graduated containment.", + "killSwitchLinked": true + }, + { + "scid": "SEN-06", + "component": "PQC WORM Telemetry Store", + "plane": "audit", + "function": "Append-only, post-quantum-signed, deterministically replayable audit.", + "killSwitchLinked": false + }, + { + "scid": "SEN-07", + "component": "Zero-Trust Mesh (SPIFFE/SPIRE)", + "plane": "identity", + "function": "mTLS service identity for all service-to-service traffic.", + "killSwitchLinked": false + }, + { + "scid": "SEN-08", + "component": "CAS-SPP Audit Bridge", + "plane": "assurance", + "function": "Feeds CAS-SPP staged-promotion records into zk-SNARK audit.", + "killSwitchLinked": false + } + ], + "gstackLayers": [ + { + "glid": "GAIRDS", + "layer": "Governed AI Resource & Data Substrate", + "tier": "substrate", + "purpose": "Assured data/resource substrate with integrity gates and provenance.", + "assuredBy": [ + "data-integrity gates", + "lineage", + "PQC WORM" + ] + }, + { + "glid": "GRI", + "layer": "Governance Registry & Index", + "tier": "registry", + "purpose": "Authoritative registry/index of governed systems, BBOMs and invariants.", + "assuredBy": [ + "authoritative registry", + "BBOM linkage" + ] + }, + { + "glid": "CEE", + "layer": "Compliance & Evaluation Engine", + "tier": "evaluation", + "purpose": "Continuous compliance evaluation and conformance scoring.", + "assuredBy": [ + "continuous eval", + "conformance scoring" + ] + }, + { + "glid": "NSNs", + "layer": "Networked Sentinel Nodes", + "tier": "network", + "purpose": "Distributed sentinel nodes observing and enforcing across the estate.", + "assuredBy": [ + "distributed sentinels", + "GIEN feeds" + ] + }, + { + "glid": "CESE", + "layer": "Containment & Escalation Sentinel Engine", + "tier": "containment", + "purpose": "Detects breach conditions and orchestrates graduated escalation/containment.", + "assuredBy": [ + "escalation engine", + "kill-switch linkage" + ] + }, + { + "glid": "GROP", + "layer": "Governance Resilience & Operations Protocol", + "tier": "resilience", + "purpose": "Operational-resilience protocol (NIS2/DORA-aligned) for the governance stack itself.", + "assuredBy": [ + "resilience protocol", + "incident SLAs" + ] + }, + { + "glid": "GHP", + "layer": "Governance Health Protocol", + "tier": "health", + "purpose": "Continuous health checks and self-diagnostics of assurance components.", + "assuredBy": [ + "health checks", + "self-diagnostics" + ] + }, + { + "glid": "GSRM", + "layer": "Governance Systemic-Risk Monitor", + "tier": "systemic-risk", + "purpose": "Monitors systemic/contagion risk across systems and jurisdictions.", + "assuredBy": [ + "systemic-risk monitor", + "BBN estimates" + ] + }, + { + "glid": "GEA", + "layer": "Governance Endgame Assurance", + "tier": "assurance", + "purpose": "Authority binding perpetual assurance evidence to board/regulator attestations.", + "assuredBy": [ + "perpetual assurance", + "signed attestations" + ] + }, + { + "glid": "Meta-Endgame", + "layer": "Meta-Endgame Governance Apex", + "tier": "apex", + "purpose": "Apex civilizational-governance authority for frontier/AGI/ASI loss-of-control scenarios.", + "assuredBy": [ + "apex authority", + "treaty-aligned", + "quorum kill switch" + ] + } + ], + "verificationArtifacts": [ + { + "vaid": "VER-01", + "artifact": "TLA+ Containment-Reachability", + "method": "TLA+", + "property": "liveness", + "statement": "Quorum-authorized kill switch is always eventually reachable.", + "gate": "frontier-merge" + }, + { + "vaid": "VER-02", + "artifact": "TLA+ No-Unsafe-Terminal", + "method": "TLA+", + "property": "safety", + "statement": "No execution reaches a policy-unsafe terminal state.", + "gate": "frontier-merge" + }, + { + "vaid": "VER-03", + "artifact": "Coq Policy-Monotonicity", + "method": "Coq", + "property": "correctness", + "statement": "Tightening policy never increases permitted actions.", + "gate": "policy-release" + }, + { + "vaid": "VER-04", + "artifact": "Coq Replay-Determinism", + "method": "Coq", + "property": "correctness", + "statement": "Replaying PQC WORM reproduces the identical decision sequence.", + "gate": "audit-release" + }, + { + "vaid": "VER-05", + "artifact": "OPA/Rego Verification Suite", + "method": "OPA-verify", + "property": "policy", + "statement": "Rego policies are conflict-free and regulatory-mapping complete.", + "gate": "policy-release" + }, + { + "vaid": "VER-06", + "artifact": "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP Audit", + "method": "zk-SNARK", + "property": "audit", + "statement": "All CAS-SPP promotions satisfied their containment gates (zero-knowledge).", + "gate": "promotion" + }, + { + "vaid": "VER-07", + "artifact": "Adaptive-Mechanism Re-Proof", + "method": "runtime+re-proof", + "property": "invariant-preservation", + "statement": "Adaptive updates preserve bound invariants or roll back.", + "gate": "adaptation" + } + ], + "failureSurfaces": [ + { + "fsid": "FS-01", + "surface": "Data poisoning / lineage break", + "dimension": "data", + "detection": "GAIRDS integrity gates + lineage diff", + "mitigation": "Quarantine + re-attest BBOM" + }, + { + "fsid": "FS-02", + "surface": "Policy gap / conflict", + "dimension": "policy", + "detection": "OPA verification suite", + "mitigation": "Block release; resolve conflict" + }, + { + "fsid": "FS-03", + "surface": "Deceptive alignment / capability concealment", + "dimension": "model", + "detection": "Crisis sims + GIEN anomaly", + "mitigation": "Demote tier; containment" + }, + { + "fsid": "FS-04", + "surface": "Crypto break (quantum)", + "dimension": "crypto", + "detection": "Q#/PQC posture monitor", + "mitigation": "Crypto-agility migration" + }, + { + "fsid": "FS-05", + "surface": "Kill-switch unreachability", + "dimension": "containment", + "detection": "TLA+ proof + drill", + "mitigation": "Re-establish quorum path" + }, + { + "fsid": "FS-06", + "surface": "Cross-jurisdiction conflict", + "dimension": "regulatory", + "detection": "Jurisdiction policy resolver", + "mitigation": "Strictest-applicable + escalate" + }, + { + "fsid": "FS-07", + "surface": "ICT third-party compromise", + "dimension": "infra", + "detection": "GROP/DORA monitoring", + "mitigation": "Isolate; incident report SLA" + }, + { + "fsid": "FS-08", + "surface": "Correlated multi-agent contagion", + "dimension": "systemic", + "detection": "GSRM + GIEN coordinator", + "mitigation": "Graduated containment" + } + ], + "jurisdictions": [ + { + "jrid": "EU", + "jurisdiction": "European Union", + "regimes": [ + "EU AI Act 2024/1689 (Annex IV)", + "GDPR Art. 22", + "NIS2", + "DORA" + ], + "posture": "strictest-applicable baseline" + }, + { + "jrid": "US", + "jurisdiction": "United States", + "regimes": [ + "NIST AI RMF 1.0", + "NIST AI 600-1", + "SR 11-7", + "FCRA/ECOA" + ], + "posture": "model-risk + fair-lending" + }, + { + "jrid": "UK", + "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", + "regimes": [ + "FCA Consumer Duty", + "SMCR", + "Basel III/IV (PRA)" + ], + "posture": "outcomes + accountability" + }, + { + "jrid": "SG", + "jurisdiction": "Singapore", + "regimes": [ + "MAS FEAT" + ], + "posture": "fairness/ethics/accountability/transparency" + }, + { + "jrid": "HK", + "jurisdiction": "Hong Kong", + "regimes": [ + "HKMA FEAT-aligned" + ], + "posture": "FEAT-aligned governance" + }, + { + "jrid": "INTL", + "jurisdiction": "International / Basel", + "regimes": [ + "Basel III/IV", + "ISO/IEC 42001" + ], + "posture": "prudential + AIMS" + } + ], + "reportSections": [ + { + "rsid": "RS-01", + "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFIs", + "abstract": "The institutional control plane mediating all AGI/ASI traffic through OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, a Sovereign API Gateway and a hardware kill switch.", + "content": "Sentinel v2.4 enforces deny-by-default OPA guardrails on every governed decision, instruments all activity through the GIEN signed telemetry network, and routes AGI/ASI-class capabilities exclusively through a jurisdiction-aware Sovereign API Gateway. A quorum-authorized hardware kill switch — with TLA+-proven reachability and quarterly drills — provides last-resort containment, while the GIEN systemic-risk coordinator detects correlated/contagion behavior across systems and triggers graduated containment with regulator-notification hooks." + }, + { + "rsid": "RS-02", + "title": "Formal Verification & Cryptographic Audit", + "abstract": "Machine-checked safety/liveness, verified policy, and zero-knowledge audit of staged promotion.", + "content": "TLA+ establishes containment-reachability and no-unsafe-terminal properties; Coq discharges policy-monotonicity, audit-completeness and replay-determinism; an OPA/Rego verification suite proves conflict-freedom and regulatory-mapping completeness; and zk-SNARK proofs over CAS-SPP records demonstrate that every staged promotion satisfied its containment gate without disclosing internals. Dynamic adaptive mechanisms are continuously monitored and re-proven, rolling back any update that would violate a bound invariant." + }, + { + "rsid": "RS-03", + "title": "The G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture", + "abstract": "A ten-layer, multi-decade, regulator-grade assurance stack from data substrate to the Meta-Endgame apex.", + "content": "The G-Stack composes GAIRDS (substrate), GRI (registry), CEE (evaluation), NSNs (networked sentinels), CESE (containment/escalation), GROP (resilience/operations), GHP (health), GSRM (systemic-risk monitor), GEA (endgame assurance) and the Meta-Endgame governance apex. Each layer is independently assured and contributes defense-in-depth, with the Meta-Endgame layer holding treaty-aligned apex authority for frontier and AGI/ASI loss-of-control scenarios in a multipolar world." + }, + { + "rsid": "RS-04", + "title": "Stress-Testing, Failure Surfaces & Perpetual Assurance", + "abstract": "Adversarial stress tests, a maintained failure-surface compendium, simulation, and always-on perpetual assurance across decades.", + "content": "Quarterly stress tests exercise flash-crash, deceptive-alignment, coordinated-agent, supply-chain and jurisdictional-fragmentation scenarios against the live stack. A failure-surface compendium catalogues data, model, policy, infra, crypto, regulatory and systemic surfaces with detection and mitigation for each. Digital-twin and Monte-Carlo simulations feed Bayesian systemic-risk estimates, while lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance protocols sustain trustworthiness through continuous re-verification, evidence-freshness SLAs and crypto-agility over a multi-decade horizon." + }, + { + "rsid": "RS-05", + "title": "Jurisdiction-Aware Anticipatory Compliance for a Multipolar World", + "abstract": "Strictest-applicable jurisdictional routing and anticipatory supervisory-artifact generation for 2026-2030.", + "content": "The Sovereign API Gateway and OPA select the strictest applicable jurisdictional policy per request, resolving conflicts conservatively. Horizon-scanning of pending rules pre-builds control deltas activated on adoption, and ARRE-style generation emits Annex-IV dossiers, SR 11-7 packs, DORA resilience evidence and FEAT/Consumer-Duty artifacts — with zk-SNARK proofs where intellectual property is sensitive — exportable to supervisory colleges across the EU, US, UK, Singapore, Hong Kong and Basel/ISO international regimes." + } + ], + "schemas": { + "SentinelComponent": "scid, component, plane, function, killSwitchLinked", + "GStackLayer": "glid, layer, tier, purpose, assuredBy[]", + "VerificationArtifact": "vaid, artifact, method(TLA+|Coq|OPA-verify|zk-SNARK|runtime+re-proof), property, statement, gate", + "FailureSurface": "fsid, surface, dimension, detection, mitigation", + "GienEvent": "eventId, prevHash, payloadHash, signer, pqcSignature, plane, ts", + "JurisdictionPolicy": "jrid, jurisdiction, regimes[], posture" + }, + "code": { + "rego_examples": [ + "package sentinel.gateway\n# Sovereign API Gateway: deny AGI/ASI-class routes lacking guardrail + kill-switch readiness\ndefault allow = false\nallow {\n input.route.class == \"agi\"\n input.guardrailsPassed == true\n input.killSwitch.ready == true\n input.jurisdictionPolicy.satisfied == true\n}", + "package gstack.cese\n# Containment & Escalation: trigger graduated containment on systemic-risk breach\ndeny[msg] {\n input.gsrm.systemicRiskPosterior > data.tiers[input.tier].gate\n msg := sprintf(\"GSRM posterior %v exceeds gate for %v -> escalate\", [input.gsrm.systemicRiskPosterior, input.tier])\n}" + ], + "yaml_artifacts": [ + "apiVersion: sentinel.gsifi/v2.4\nkind: SovereignGateway\nmetadata:\n name: agi-ingress\nspec:\n mediatedPathOnly: true\n jurisdictionAware: true\n killSwitchLinked: true\n guardrails: opa\n telemetry: gien-pqc-worm", + "apiVersion: gstack/v1\nkind: GStackDeployment\nspec:\n layers: [GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame]\n perpetualAssurance: true\n resilience: nis2-dora" + ], + "tla_snippets": [ + "---- MODULE SentinelKillSwitch ----\nVARIABLES state\nKillReachable == <>(state = \"contained\")\nSafe == [](state # \"unsafe_terminal\")\nTHEOREM Spec => (Safe /\\ KillReachable)\n====" + ], + "coq_snippets": [ + "Theorem replay_determinism : forall log,\n well_formed log -> replay log = canonical_decisions log.\nProof. (* discharged; anchored in PQC WORM *) Qed." + ], + "openapi_snippets": [ + "paths:\n /api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/gstack-layers:\n get: { summary: List G-Stack layers, responses: { '200': { description: OK } } }" + ] + }, + "kpis": { + "Sentinel-GuardrailCoverage": ">=0.98 by 2027 (continuous)", + "GIEN-TelemetryCompleteness": "1.0 (continuous)", + "SovereignGateway-Enforcement": "1.0 (per request)", + "KillSwitch-DrillPass": "1.0 (quarterly)", + "PQC-WORM-Integrity": "1.0 (continuous)", + "TLAPlus-ModelCheckPass": "1.0 (per merge)", + "Coq-ProofObligationsClosed": ">=0.98 (per release)", + "OPA-PolicyVerifyPass": "1.0 (per policy release)", + "zkSNARK-CASSPP-VerifyRate": "1.0 (per promotion)", + "AdaptiveMechanism-VerifyRate": ">=0.95 (per adaptation)", + "GStack-PerpetualAssurance": ">=0.99 (continuous)", + "FailureSurface-Coverage": ">=0.90 (quarterly)", + "StressTest-Pass": ">=0.95 (quarterly)", + "Jurisdiction-GreenAtGate": ">=0.95 (per request)" + }, + "riskControlMatrix": [ + { + "risk": "Unmediated AGI/ASI access", + "control": "Sovereign API Gateway as sole mediated path + OPA guardrails", + "owner": "CTO / CISO", + "evidence": "Gateway + guardrail decision logs" + }, + { + "risk": "Loss of control / no containment", + "control": "Hardware kill switch (TLA+-proven reachability) + CESE escalation", + "owner": "CISO / Safety Lead", + "evidence": "TLA+ proof + drill records" + }, + { + "risk": "Audit tampering / non-repudiation gap", + "control": "PQC WORM telemetry (append-only, hash-chained, PQC-signed)", + "owner": "CISO / Internal Audit", + "evidence": "WORM integrity + replay reports" + }, + { + "risk": "Faulty / conflicting policy", + "control": "OPA/Rego formal verification suite as CI gate", + "owner": "Head of Policy", + "evidence": "Verification suite results" + }, + { + "risk": "Unverifiable staged promotion", + "control": "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit", + "owner": "CRO / Safety", + "evidence": "Verifier-accepted proofs" + }, + { + "risk": "Adaptive mechanism drifts unsafe", + "control": "Runtime monitors + re-proof + rollback", + "owner": "CDAO", + "evidence": "Re-proof + rollback logs" + }, + { + "risk": "Systemic / contagion event", + "control": "GSRM + GIEN systemic-risk coordination + graduated containment", + "owner": "CRO", + "evidence": "GSRM posteriors + containment actions" + }, + { + "risk": "Operational-resilience failure (ICT)", + "control": "GROP + NIS2/DORA controls (third-party, incident, testing)", + "owner": "COO / CISO", + "evidence": "DORA resilience evidence" + }, + { + "risk": "Cross-jurisdiction non-compliance", + "control": "Jurisdiction-aware strictest-applicable routing + anticipatory deltas", + "owner": "CCO", + "evidence": "Jurisdiction resolution audit" + }, + { + "risk": "Assurance decay over decades", + "control": "Perpetual assurance protocols + lifecycle-integrity reporting + crypto-agility", + "owner": "GEA / Board", + "evidence": "Signed integrity reports" + } + ], + "traceability": [ + { + "from": "Sentinel v2.4 (M1)", + "to": "EU AI Act Art. 12/14 / NIST Manage", + "via": "GIEN telemetry + guardrail logs" + }, + { + "from": "Zero-trust + PQC WORM (M2)", + "to": "EU AI Act Art. 12 / NIS2 / DORA", + "via": "Append-only signed audit" + }, + { + "from": "Formal verification (M3)", + "to": "SR 11-7 / NIST Measure", + "via": "TLA+/Coq/OPA/zk artifacts" + }, + { + "from": "G-Stack (M4)", + "to": "EU AI Act systemic-risk / ISO 42001", + "via": "Layered assurance + GEA attestation" + }, + { + "from": "Stress-testing (M5)", + "to": "DORA threat-led testing / SR 11-7", + "via": "Stress-test + failure-surface reports" + }, + { + "from": "Perpetual assurance (M6)", + "to": "ISO 42001 improvement / Basel op-risk", + "via": "Lifecycle-integrity reports" + }, + { + "from": "Jurisdiction compliance (M7)", + "to": "All regimes (multipolar)", + "via": "Supervisory artifacts + zk proofs" + } + ], + "dataFlows": [ + { + "flow": "Request -> Sovereign API Gateway -> OPA guardrails -> allow/deny -> GIEN event -> PQC WORM" + }, + { + "flow": "GIEN events -> GIEN systemic-risk coordinator + GSRM -> systemic-risk posterior" + }, + { + "flow": "CAS-SPP promotion records -> zk-SNARK circuit -> verifier -> PQC WORM anchor" + }, + { + "flow": "Adaptive update -> invariant monitor -> re-proof trigger -> allow or rollback" + }, + { + "flow": "G-Stack assurance evidence -> GEA -> signed attestation -> supervisory artifact / zk proof" + } + ], + "regulators": [ + { + "name": "EU AI Office", + "scope": "EU AI Act 2024/1689, Annex IV, GPAI systemic risk" + }, + { + "name": "ESAs (EBA/ESMA/EIOPA)", + "scope": "DORA oversight, ICT third-party risk" + }, + { + "name": "ECB / SSM", + "scope": "Prudential supervision, internal models" + }, + { + "name": "Federal Reserve / OCC", + "scope": "SR 11-7 model risk management" + }, + { + "name": "NIST", + "scope": "AI RMF 1.0, AI 600-1 GenAI profile" + }, + { + "name": "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42", + "scope": "ISO/IEC 42001 AI management systems" + }, + { + "name": "FCA / PRA", + "scope": "SMCR, Consumer Duty, Basel III/IV (UK)" + }, + { + "name": "MAS", + "scope": "FEAT principles" + }, + { + "name": "HKMA", + "scope": "FEAT-aligned AI governance" + }, + { + "name": "EDPB / DPAs", + "scope": "GDPR Arts. 5, 22, 35 (DPIA)" + } + ], + "rollout90": [ + { + "day": "0-15", + "task": "Deploy Sovereign API Gateway + OPA guardrails in shadow; stand up GIEN telemetry." + }, + { + "day": "15-30", + "task": "Enable PQC WORM telemetry on zero-trust K8s/Kafka backbone; SPIFFE/SPIRE identities." + }, + { + "day": "30-45", + "task": "Install hardware kill switch; prove reachability in TLA+; first containment drill." + }, + { + "day": "45-60", + "task": "Bring OPA/Rego verification suite + Coq replay-determinism into CI gates." + }, + { + "day": "60-75", + "task": "Stand up first G-Stack layers (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE); wire GSRM." + }, + { + "day": "75-90", + "task": "Run first stress test + simulation; publish lifecycle-integrity baseline to board/regulator." + } + ], + "evidencePack": [ + "Sentinel v2.4 deployment topology + guardrail/gateway decision logs", + "GIEN telemetry completeness reports (signed)", + "Hardware kill-switch TLA+ proof + quarterly drill records", + "PQC WORM integrity & deterministic-replay reports", + "TLA+/Coq proof artifacts + OPA verification suite results", + "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP audit proof bundles + verifier results", + "G-Stack layer assurance attestations (GEA-signed)", + "Stress-test reports + failure-surface compendium", + "Lifecycle-integrity reports + perpetual-assurance evidence-freshness logs", + "Jurisdiction-aware supervisory artifacts (Annex IV / SR 11-7 / DORA / FEAT)" + ], + "executiveSummary": { + "headline": "WP-065 designs Sentinel AI v2.4 as the mediated control plane and the G-Stack as a ten-layer, multi-decade civilizational-assurance architecture for AGI/ASI in G-SIFIs — formally verified, cryptographically audited, stress-tested and jurisdiction-aware for a multipolar 2026-2030 world.", + "scope": "Sentinel v2.4 stack, zero-trust backbone, formal verification (TLA+/Coq/OPA/zk-SNARK CAS-SPP), the G-Stack (GAIRDS/GRI/CEE/NSNs/CESE/GROP/GHP/GSRM/GEA/Meta-Endgame), stress-testing/perpetual assurance, and jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance aligned to EU AI Act 2024/1689 (Annex IV), NIST RMF/600-1, ISO 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer Duty/SMCR and MAS/HKMA FEAT.", + "investment": "$220M-$390M over five years (multi-decade assurance, risk-adjusted, G-SIFI scale).", + "targetIndices": "Guardrail coverage >=0.98; PQC WORM integrity 1.0; TLA+/OPA verify 1.0; zk-SNARK CAS-SPP 1.0; perpetual assurance >=0.99.", + "recommendation": "Approve the phased 2026-2030 programme: deploy Sentinel v2.4 + zero-trust backbone first, then the formal-verification regime, then the G-Stack assurance layers and perpetual assurance — ensuring verification and containment always precede frontier capability.", + "differentiators": [ + "Single mediated AGI/ASI path via the Sovereign API Gateway with deny-by-default OPA guardrails", + "TLA+-proven hardware kill switch and PQC WORM deterministic-replay audit", + "zk-SNARK cryptographic audit of CAS-SPP staged promotion", + "Ten-layer G-Stack with a Meta-Endgame civilizational-governance apex", + "Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance for a multipolar regulatory world" + ] + }, + "counts": { + "modules": 8, + "sections": 28, + "sentinelComponents": 8, + "gstackLayers": 10, + "verificationArtifacts": 7, + "failureSurfaces": 8, + "jurisdictions": 6, + "reportSections": 5, + "kpis": 14, + "riskControlMatrix": 10, + "traceability": 7, + "dataFlows": 5, + "regulators": 10, + "rollout90": 6, + "evidencePack": 10, + "indices": 14 + } +} diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030-html.py b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030-html.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000..84076002 --- /dev/null +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030-html.py @@ -0,0 +1,282 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +"""WP-065 HTML renderer — Sentinel v2.4 + G-Stack civilizational-assurance blueprint.""" +import json +from pathlib import Path +from html import escape + +ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent +SRC = ROOT / "data" / "sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json" +OUT = ROOT / "public" / "sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html" +OUT.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) +DOC = json.loads(SRC.read_text(encoding="utf-8")) + + +def e(x): + return escape(str(x)) + + +SKIP = ( + "mid", "sid", "scid", "glid", "vaid", "fsid", "jrid", "rsid", + "title", "abstract", "content", "component", "plane", "layer", + "tier", "artifact", "method", "property", "statement", "surface", + "dimension", "jurisdiction", +) + + +def kv_pairs(d, skip=SKIP): + parts = [] + for k, v in d.items(): + if k in skip: + continue + if isinstance(v, list): + inner = "".join( + f"<li>{e(x) if not isinstance(x, dict) else e(json.dumps(x))}</li>" + for x in v + ) + parts.append(f"<div class='kv'><b>{e(k)}</b><ul>{inner}</ul></div>") + elif isinstance(v, dict): + inner = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(kk)}</b>: {e(vv)}</li>" for kk, vv in v.items()) + parts.append(f"<div class='kv'><b>{e(k)}</b><ul>{inner}</ul></div>") + else: + parts.append(f"<div class='kv'><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</div>") + return "".join(parts) + + +def section_html(s): + return f"<div class='sec'><h4>{e(s['sid'])}. {e(s['title'])}</h4>{kv_pairs(s)}</div>" + + +def module_html(m): + secs = "".join(section_html(s) for s in m["sections"]) + purpose = m.get("purpose") or "" + return ( + f"<section class='module' id='{e(m['mid'])}'>" + f"<h3>{e(m['mid'])} — {e(m['title'])}</h3>" + f"<p class='sum'>{e(purpose)}</p>{secs}</section>" + ) + + +def list_array(arr, label_keys, anchor, title): + rows = [] + for it in arr: + head_parts = [e(it.get(label_keys[0], ""))] + [e(it.get(k, "")) for k in label_keys[1:]] + head = " · ".join(p for p in head_parts if p) + rows.append(f"<div class='card'><div class='card-head'>{head}</div>{kv_pairs(it)}</div>") + return f"<section id='{anchor}'><h3>{title} ({len(arr)})</h3>{''.join(rows)}</section>" + + +distinctive = [ + ("sentinelComponents", "sentinel-components", "Sentinel v2.4 Components (M1)", ["scid", "component", "plane"]), + ("gstackLayers", "gstack-layers", "G-Stack Layers (M4)", ["glid", "layer", "tier"]), + ("verificationArtifacts", "verification-artifacts", "Formal Verification Artifacts (M3)", ["vaid", "artifact", "method"]), + ("failureSurfaces", "failure-surfaces", "Failure-Surface Compendium (M5)", ["fsid", "surface", "dimension"]), + ("jurisdictions", "jurisdictions", "Jurisdiction-Aware Compliance (M7)", ["jrid", "jurisdiction"]), +] + + +toc_modules = "".join( + f"<li><a href='#{e(m['mid'])}'>{e(m['mid'])} — {e(m['title'])}</a></li>" + for m in DOC["modules"] +) +toc_distinct = "".join( + f"<li><a href='#{anchor}'>{e(label)}</a></li>" + for _, anchor, label, _ in distinctive +) + +modules_html = "".join(module_html(m) for m in DOC["modules"]) +distinctive_html = "".join( + list_array(DOC[key], keys, anchor, label) + for key, anchor, label, keys in distinctive +) + + +def table_rows(rows, cols): + head = "".join(f"<th>{e(c)}</th>" for c in cols) + body = "".join("<tr>" + "".join(f"<td>{e(r.get(c, ''))}</td>" for c in cols) + "</tr>" for r in rows) + return f"<table><thead><tr>{head}</tr></thead><tbody>{body}</tbody></table>" + + +def table_dict(d, key_label, val_label="value"): + head = f"<tr><th>{e(key_label)}</th><th>{e(val_label)}</th></tr>" + rows = [] + for k, v in d.items(): + if isinstance(v, dict): + vstr = "; ".join(f"{kk}={vv}" for kk, vv in v.items()) + elif isinstance(v, list): + vstr = "; ".join(json.dumps(x) if isinstance(x, dict) else str(x) for x in v) + else: + vstr = str(v) + rows.append(f"<tr><td>{e(k)}</td><td>{e(vstr)}</td></tr>") + return f"<table><thead>{head}</thead><tbody>{''.join(rows)}</tbody></table>" + + +report_full_html = ( + "<section id='report-sections-full'><h3>Whitepaper Sections — <title> / <abstract> / <content></h3>" + + "".join( + f"<div class='card'><div class='card-head'>{e(rs['rsid'])} · {e(rs['title'])}</div>" + f"<div class='kv'><b>abstract</b>: {e(rs['abstract'])}</div>" + f"<div class='kv'><b>content</b>: {e(rs['content'])}</div></div>" + for rs in DOC["reportSections"] + ) + + "</section>" +) + +schemas_html = f"<section id='schemas'><h3>Schemas ({len(DOC['schemas'])})</h3>{table_dict(DOC['schemas'], 'schema', 'fields')}</section>" +code_html = ( + "<section id='code'><h3>Code & Artifacts (Rego / YAML / TLA+ / Coq / OpenAPI)</h3>" + + "".join( + f"<div class='kv'><b>{e(k)}</b><ul>" + "".join(f"<li><pre>{e(item)}</pre></li>" for item in v) + "</ul></div>" + for k, v in DOC["code"].items() + ) + + "</section>" +) +kpis_html = f"<section id='kpis'><h3>KPIs / Indices ({len(DOC['kpis'])})</h3>{table_dict(DOC['kpis'], 'index', 'target/cadence')}</section>" +rcm_html = f"<section id='rcm'><h3>Risk Control Matrix ({len(DOC['riskControlMatrix'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['riskControlMatrix'], ['risk','control','owner','evidence'])}</section>" +trace_html = f"<section id='trace'><h3>Traceability ({len(DOC['traceability'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['traceability'], ['from','to','via'])}</section>" +flows_html = f"<section id='data-flows'><h3>Data Flows ({len(DOC['dataFlows'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['dataFlows'], ['flow'])}</section>" +regs_html = f"<section id='regulators'><h3>Regulators ({len(DOC['regulators'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['regulators'], ['name','scope'])}</section>" +rollout_html = f"<section id='rollout-90'><h3>90-Day Rollout ({len(DOC['rollout90'])})</h3>{table_rows(DOC['rollout90'], ['day','task'])}</section>" +evidence_html = ( + f"<section id='evidence-pack'><h3>Regulator Evidence Pack ({len(DOC['evidencePack'])})</h3>" + + "<ul>" + "".join(f"<li>{e(x)}</li>" for x in DOC["evidencePack"]) + "</ul></section>" +) + +tail_html = schemas_html + code_html + kpis_html + rcm_html + trace_html + flows_html + regs_html + rollout_html + evidence_html + + +exs = DOC["executiveSummary"] +exec_html = f""" +<section id='exec'><h3>Executive Summary</h3> +<p><b>Headline:</b> {e(exs['headline'])}</p> +<p><b>Scope:</b> {e(exs['scope'])}</p> +<p><b>Investment:</b> {e(exs['investment'])}</p> +<p><b>Target Indices:</b> {e(exs['targetIndices'])}</p> +<p><b>Board Recommendation:</b> {e(exs['recommendation'])}</p> +<div class='kv'><b>Differentiators</b><ul>{''.join(f'<li>{e(x)}</li>' for x in exs['differentiators'])}</ul></div> +</section> +""" + + +directive = DOC["directive"] +indices_rows = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</li>" for k, v in DOC["indices"].items()) +tier_rows = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</li>" for k, v in DOC["tiers"].items()) +sev_rows = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</li>" for k, v in DOC["severities"].items()) +invest = DOC["investment"] +invest_breakdown = "".join(f"<li><b>{e(k)}</b>: {e(v)}</li>" for k, v in invest["breakdown"].items()) +audiences_list = "".join(f"<li>{e(a)}</li>" for a in DOC["audiences"]) + +meta_html = f""" +<section id='directive'><h3>Strategic Directive</h3> +<p><b>Scope:</b> {e(directive['scope'])}</p> +<div class='kv'><b>Outcomes</b><ul>{''.join(f'<li>{e(x)}</li>' for x in directive['outcomes'])}</ul></div> +<div class='kv'><b>Do NOT</b><ul>{''.join(f'<li>{e(x)}</li>' for x in directive['doNot'])}</ul></div> +</section> + +<section id='audiences'><h3>Intended Audiences ({len(DOC['audiences'])})</h3><ul>{audiences_list}</ul></section> + +<section id='indices'><h3>Performance Indices ({len(DOC['indices'])})</h3><ul>{indices_rows}</ul></section> + +<section id='tiers'><h3>Autonomy / Assurance Tiers</h3><ul>{tier_rows}</ul></section> + +<section id='severities'><h3>Severity Levels</h3><ul>{sev_rows}</ul></section> + +<section id='investment'><h3>Investment Envelope</h3> +<p><b>Total Range:</b> {e(invest['totalRange'])} · <b>Window:</b> {e(invest['programWindow'])} · <b>Currency:</b> {e(invest['currency'])}</p> +<div class='kv'><b>Breakdown</b><ul>{invest_breakdown}</ul></div> +</section> +""" + + +html = f"""<!doctype html> +<html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8"> +<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> +<title>{e(DOC['title'])} + + +
+

{e(DOC['title'])}

+
docRef {e(DOC['docRef'])} · v{e(DOC['version'])} · {e(DOC['status'])}
+
{e(DOC['classification'])}
+
Horizon: {e(DOC['horizon'])} · API prefix: {e(DOC['apiPrefix'])} · builds on {' · '.join(e(b) for b in DOC['buildsOn'])}
+
+{''.join(f"{v} {e(k)}" for k,v in DOC['counts'].items())} +
+
+
+ +
+{exec_html} +{meta_html} +{modules_html} +{distinctive_html} +{report_full_html} +{tail_html} +
+
+ +""" + +OUT.write_text(html, encoding="utf-8") +print(f"WP-065 HTML written: {OUT} ({OUT.stat().st_size} bytes)") diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.py b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000..400c2712 --- /dev/null +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.py @@ -0,0 +1,402 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +""" +WP-065: Comprehensive 2026-2030 Technical & Governance Analysis and Design of +Sentinel AI v2.4 and the G-Stack Architecture for AGI/ASI Governance in Global +Systemically Important Financial Institutions (G-SIFIs). + +This blueprint is the *Sentinel v2.4 platform + G-Stack civilizational-assurance* +layer. Where WP-062 is the strategic master synthesis, WP-063 the buildable +WRE/Sentinel services, and WP-064 the formal-assurance constructs (BBOM, UMIF, +CAS-SPP+BBN, ARRE+zk-SNARK), WP-065 specifies: + + (1) Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFI deployment — OPA guardrails, + GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway, hardware kill switch, zero-trust + Kubernetes/Kafka/OPA backbone, PQC WORM telemetry, GIEN systemic-risk coord. + (2) Formal verification — TLA+/Coq, OPA/Rego policy verification, zk-SNARK + CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification. + (3) Multi-decade, regulator-grade civilizational-assurance stack — G-Stack + (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame), + stress-test frameworks, failure-surface compendia, simulation frameworks, + lifecycle-integrity reporting, perpetual assurance protocols. + (4) Jurisdiction-aware, anticipatory compliance & supervisory artifacts aligned + with EU AI Act 2024/1689 Annex IV, NIST AI RMF 1.0 / AI 600-1, ISO/IEC + 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer + Duty/SMCR, MAS/HKMA FEAT in a multipolar 2026-2030 world. + +Eight modules: + M1 — Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack (components & control planes) + M2 — Zero-trust backbone (Kubernetes/Kafka/OPA, PQC WORM, kill switch) + M3 — Formal verification (TLA+/Coq, OPA/Rego, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP, adaptive) + M4 — G-Stack civilizational-assurance architecture (10 named layers) + M5 — Stress-testing, failure surfaces & simulation frameworks + M6 — Lifecycle integrity & perpetual assurance protocols + M7 — Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance & supervisory artifacts + M8 — Regulator-ready report sections (/<abstract>/<content>) +""" +import json +import os + +OUT = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "data", "sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json") + +DOC = { + "docRef": "SENTINEL-GSTACK-GSIFI-2030-WP-065", + "version": "1.0.0", + "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 & G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture for AGI/ASI Governance in G-SIFIs — 2026-2030 Technical & Governance Analysis and Design", + "horizon": "2026-2030", + "apiPrefix": "/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030", + "buildsOn": ["WP-060", "WP-061", "WP-062", "WP-063", "WP-064"], + "status": "platform-and-civilizational-assurance-design", + "classification": "Confidential / Restricted — Board, CEO, CRO, CCO, CISO, CDAO, CTO, Enterprise Architects, AI Platform Engineers, AI Safety Researchers, Model Risk, Internal Audit, External Regulators & Supervisory Colleges", + "audiences": [ + "Board & Board Technology/Risk Committees", + "C-Suite (CEO, CRO, CCO, CISO, CDAO, CTO)", + "Enterprise Architects & AI Platform Engineers", + "AI Safety & Alignment Researchers", + "Model Risk Management & Independent Validation", + "Internal Audit & SMCR Accountable Executives", + "External Regulators & Supervisory Colleges", + ], + "directive": { + "scope": "Provide the technical and governance analysis and design for (1) the Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFI deployment, (2) its formal-verification regime (TLA+/Coq, OPA/Rego, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification), (3) the multi-decade, regulator-grade G-Stack civilizational-assurance architecture (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame) with stress-testing, failure-surface compendia, simulation, lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance, and (4) jurisdiction-aware, anticipatory compliance and supervisory artifacts aligned to EU AI Act 2024/1689 Annex IV, NIST AI RMF 1.0/600-1, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer Duty/SMCR and MAS/HKMA FEAT in a multipolar 2026-2030 world.", + "outcomes": [ + "Sentinel v2.4 deployed across material AI with OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway and hardware kill switch by 2027", + "Zero-trust K8s/Kafka/OPA backbone with PQC WORM telemetry operational by 2027", + "Formal-verification regime (TLA+/Coq + OPA/Rego + zk-SNARK CAS-SPP) gating frontier promotion by 2028", + "G-Stack civilizational-assurance layers operational with perpetual assurance protocols by 2029", + "Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance artifacts auto-emitted to supervisory colleges by 2029", + ], + "doNot": [ + "Do NOT route any AGI/ASI-class request outside the Sovereign API Gateway + OPA guardrails", + "Do NOT operate without PQC WORM telemetry and a tested hardware kill switch", + "Do NOT promote a frontier system with a failing TLA+/Coq proof or unverified adaptive mechanism", + "Do NOT disable perpetual assurance monitoring or lifecycle-integrity reporting", + "Do NOT assume single-jurisdiction compliance in a multipolar regulatory world", + ], + }, + "indices": { + "Sentinel-GuardrailCoverage": ">=0.98 (decisions through OPA guardrails)", + "GIEN-TelemetryCompleteness": "1.0 (governance-instrumented event coverage)", + "SovereignGateway-PolicyEnforcement": "1.0 (requests policy-checked at gateway)", + "KillSwitch-Readiness": "1.0 (hardware kill switch verified & drilled)", + "ZeroTrust-mTLSCoverage": ">=0.99 (service-to-service mTLS / SPIFFE)", + "PQC-WORM-Integrity": "1.0 (post-quantum-signed append-only telemetry)", + "TLAPlus-ModelCheckPass": "1.0 (temporal safety/liveness per merge)", + "Coq-ProofObligationsClosed": ">=0.98 (discharged obligations)", + "OPA-PolicyVerifyPass": "1.0 (Rego policy verification suite)", + "zkSNARK-CASSPP-VerifyRate": "1.0 (CAS-SPP audit proofs accepted)", + "AdaptiveMechanism-VerifyRate": ">=0.95 (verified adaptive updates)", + "GStack-PerpetualAssurance": ">=0.99 (continuous assurance uptime)", + "FailureSurface-Coverage": ">=0.90 (catalogued vs modeled failure surfaces)", + "Jurisdiction-CompliancePosture": ">=0.95 (jurisdictions green at gate)", + }, + "tiers": { + "T0-Lab": "Containment lab only; Sentinel shadow; no production routing.", + "T1-Assisted": "Human-in-the-loop; gateway + guardrails; GIEN telemetry on.", + "T2-Supervised": "Material decisions; full formal verification; PQC WORM.", + "T3-Autonomous-Constrained": "Bounded autonomy; zk-SNARK CAS-SPP; G-Stack assurance.", + "T4-Frontier-Class": "AGI/ASI-grade; Meta-Endgame governance; treaty-aligned; quorum kill switch.", + }, + "severities": { + "S1-Systemic": "Civilizational/systemic loss-of-control potential; Meta-Endgame + regulator + containment.", + "S2-Severe": "Material prudential/consumer harm; CRO + SMCR exec; halt + remediate.", + "S3-Elevated": "Localized harm or control gap; model owner + MRM; mitigate within SLA.", + "S4-Routine": "Drift/quality deviation; automated rollback + ticket.", + }, + "investment": { + "currency": "USD", + "programWindow": "2026-2030 (5 years; perpetual-assurance steady state beyond)", + "totalRange": "$220M-$390M (G-SIFI scale; multi-decade assurance, risk-adjusted)", + "breakdown": { + "Sentinel v2.4 platform (gateway, GIEN, guardrails, kill switch)": "$55M-$95M", + "Zero-trust backbone (K8s/Kafka/OPA, PQC WORM, SPIFFE)": "$35M-$60M", + "Formal verification (TLA+/Coq, OPA verify, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP)": "$45M-$80M", + "G-Stack civilizational assurance (10 layers, simulation, perpetual assurance)": "$50M-$90M", + "Jurisdiction-aware compliance & supervisory artifacts": "$20M-$35M", + "Governance, stress-testing, training & assurance ops": "$15M-$30M", + }, + }, + "modules": [ + { + "mid": "M1", + "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack", + "purpose": "The institutional control plane for G-SIFI AGI/ASI: OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway, hardware kill switch, and GIEN systemic-risk coordination — the single mediated path for all governed AI traffic.", + "sections": [ + {"sid": "M1.1", "title": "OPA guardrails", "description": "Inline policy guardrails evaluating every request/decision against regulatory and internal Rego policies before execution.", "controls": ["Deny-by-default", "Policy versioned in CI", "Decision logs to PQC WORM"]}, + {"sid": "M1.2", "title": "GIEN telemetry", "description": "Governance-Instrumented Event Network: structured, signed telemetry of every governed decision, gate and override for observability and systemic-risk coordination.", "controls": ["Complete event coverage", "Signed events", "Systemic-risk feed"]}, + {"sid": "M1.3", "title": "Sovereign API Gateway", "description": "The sole mediated ingress/egress for AGI/ASI-class capabilities; enforces identity, policy, rate, jurisdiction and containment posture.", "controls": ["Single mediated path", "Jurisdiction-aware routing", "Containment-aware throttling"]}, + {"sid": "M1.4", "title": "Hardware kill switch", "description": "Quorum-authorized physical + logical kill switch with proven reachability (TLA+) and quarterly drills.", "controls": ["Quorum (n-of-m)", "TLA+ reachability proof", "Quarterly drill"]}, + {"sid": "M1.5", "title": "GIEN systemic-risk coordination", "description": "Cross-system coordination using GIEN feeds to detect correlated/contagion behavior and trigger graduated containment.", "controls": ["Correlation detection", "Graduated containment", "Regulator notify hooks"]}, + ], + }, + { + "mid": "M2", + "title": "Zero-Trust Backbone — Kubernetes / Kafka / OPA + PQC WORM", + "purpose": "The runtime substrate beneath Sentinel v2.4: a zero-trust Kubernetes/Kafka/OPA backbone with post-quantum-signed WORM telemetry providing tamper-evident, deterministically replayable audit.", + "sections": [ + {"sid": "M2.1", "title": "Zero-trust service mesh", "description": "SPIFFE/SPIRE identities and mTLS for all service-to-service traffic; no implicit trust.", "controls": ["SPIFFE/SPIRE identity", "mTLS everywhere", "Per-tier namespace isolation"]}, + {"sid": "M2.2", "title": "Kafka event backbone", "description": "Governed Kafka topics with ACLs carry GIEN telemetry and audit events at scale.", "controls": ["ACL governance", "Schema registry", "Topic-level retention policy"]}, + {"sid": "M2.3", "title": "OPA policy plane", "description": "Centralized OPA evaluates admission and decision-time policy; integrates with Sentinel guardrails.", "controls": ["Admission webhooks", "Decision logging", "Policy unit tests"]}, + {"sid": "M2.4", "title": "PQC WORM telemetry", "description": "Append-only, hash-chained, post-quantum-signed (e.g., ML-DSA) write-once telemetry enabling deterministic replay.", "controls": ["Append-only", "PQC signatures", "Deterministic replay (DRI)"]}, + ], + }, + { + "mid": "M3", + "title": "Formal Verification & Cryptographic Audit", + "purpose": "Machine-checked assurance for Sentinel and G-Stack: TLA+/Coq proofs, OPA/Rego policy verification, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, and verification of dynamic adaptive mechanisms.", + "sections": [ + {"sid": "M3.1", "title": "TLA+/Coq proofs", "description": "Temporal safety/liveness (TLA+: kill-switch reachability, no-unsafe-terminal) and deductive correctness (Coq: policy-monotonicity, audit-completeness, replay-determinism).", "controls": ["Model-check in CI", "Proof obligations closed", "Versioned with code"]}, + {"sid": "M3.2", "title": "OPA/Rego policy verification", "description": "Formal verification of Rego policies (coverage, conflict-freedom, regulatory-mapping completeness) as a CI gate.", "controls": ["Coverage proofs", "Conflict detection", "Reg-mapping completeness"]}, + {"sid": "M3.3", "title": "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit", "description": "Zero-knowledge proofs over CAS-SPP staged-promotion records: prove containment-gate compliance and audit integrity without disclosing internals.", "controls": ["Circuit per gate statement", "Verifier-accepted proofs", "Anchored in PQC WORM"]}, + {"sid": "M3.4", "title": "Dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification", "description": "Verify that online-learning / self-modifying / adaptive mechanisms preserve bound invariants across updates (runtime monitors + re-proof triggers).", "controls": ["Invariant-preserving updates", "Re-proof on adaptation", "Rollback on violation"]}, + ], + }, + { + "mid": "M4", + "title": "G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture", + "purpose": "A multi-decade, regulator-grade civilizational-assurance architecture composed of ten named layers, from data substrate to the Meta-Endgame governance apex, designed for frontier and AGI/ASI systems in a multipolar world.", + "sections": [ + {"sid": "M4.1", "title": "G-Stack overview", "description": "Ten composable layers (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame) providing defense-in-depth from data integrity to civilizational endgame governance.", "controls": ["Layered defense-in-depth", "Each layer independently assured", "Meta-Endgame apex authority"]}, + {"sid": "M4.2", "title": "Substrate & registry layers", "description": "GAIRDS (data substrate), GRI (registry/index), CEE (compliance/evaluation engine) provide the assured foundation.", "controls": ["Data integrity gates", "Authoritative registry", "Continuous evaluation"]}, + {"sid": "M4.3", "title": "Network & sentinel layers", "description": "NSNs (networked sentinel nodes), CESE (containment/escalation sentinel engine), GROP (resilience/operations protocol).", "controls": ["Distributed sentinels", "Escalation engine", "Resilience protocol"]}, + {"sid": "M4.4", "title": "Health, systemic-risk & endgame layers", "description": "GHP (health protocol), GSRM (systemic-risk monitor), GEA (assurance authority), Meta-Endgame (apex civilizational governance).", "controls": ["Continuous health checks", "Systemic-risk monitoring", "Apex endgame controls"]}, + ], + }, + { + "mid": "M5", + "title": "Stress-Testing, Failure Surfaces & Simulation", + "purpose": "Adversarial stress-test frameworks, a failure-surface compendium, and simulation frameworks that exercise Sentinel + G-Stack under crisis to evidence resilience for regulators.", + "sections": [ + {"sid": "M5.1", "title": "Stress-test frameworks", "description": "Scenario libraries (flash-crash, deceptive-alignment, coordinated-agent, supply-chain compromise, jurisdictional fragmentation) run against the live stack.", "controls": ["Quarterly stress tests", "Severity-tiered scenarios", "Findings -> assurance backlog"]}, + {"sid": "M5.2", "title": "Failure-surface compendium", "description": "A maintained catalogue of failure surfaces across data, model, policy, infra, crypto, governance and cross-jurisdiction dimensions, each with detection and mitigation.", "controls": ["Catalogued surfaces", "Detection + mitigation per surface", "Coverage tracking"]}, + {"sid": "M5.3", "title": "Simulation frameworks", "description": "Digital-twin and Monte-Carlo simulation of Sentinel/G-Stack behavior and systemic contagion, feeding Bayesian systemic-risk estimates.", "controls": ["Digital-twin sims", "Monte-Carlo contagion", "BBN evidence feed"]}, + ], + }, + { + "mid": "M6", + "title": "Lifecycle Integrity & Perpetual Assurance", + "purpose": "Lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance protocols ensuring the stack remains trustworthy across a multi-decade horizon, not just at deployment.", + "sections": [ + {"sid": "M6.1", "title": "Lifecycle-integrity reporting", "description": "Continuous attestation across build -> deploy -> operate -> adapt -> retire, with signed integrity reports for boards and regulators.", "controls": ["Per-stage attestation", "Signed integrity reports", "Drift-from-baseline alerts"]}, + {"sid": "M6.2", "title": "Perpetual assurance protocols", "description": "Always-on assurance: continuous re-verification, evidence freshness SLAs, and automatic re-proof on change or environmental shift.", "controls": ["Continuous re-verification", "Evidence freshness SLA", "Auto re-proof triggers"]}, + {"sid": "M6.3", "title": "Multi-decade governance continuity", "description": "Crypto-agility, key-rotation, standard-version migration and institutional-memory protocols to sustain assurance over decades.", "controls": ["Crypto-agility", "Standard-migration runbooks", "Institutional-memory archive"]}, + ], + }, + { + "mid": "M7", + "title": "Jurisdiction-Aware Anticipatory Compliance & Supervisory Artifacts", + "purpose": "Compliance that anticipates regulatory divergence in a multipolar world and emits machine-readable supervisory artifacts mapped per jurisdiction.", + "sections": [ + {"sid": "M7.1", "title": "Jurisdiction-aware policy routing", "description": "Sovereign API Gateway + OPA select the strictest applicable jurisdictional policy per request; conflicts resolved conservatively.", "controls": ["Per-jurisdiction policy sets", "Strictest-applicable resolution", "Routing audit"]}, + {"sid": "M7.2", "title": "Anticipatory compliance", "description": "Horizon-scanning of pending rules (e.g., evolving GPAI/systemic-risk guidance) with pre-built control deltas activated on adoption.", "controls": ["Regulatory horizon scan", "Pre-built control deltas", "Activation runbooks"]}, + {"sid": "M7.3", "title": "Supervisory artifact design", "description": "Auto-generated Annex-IV dossiers, SR 11-7 packs, DORA resilience evidence and FEAT/Consumer-Duty artifacts, with zk-SNARK proofs where IP-sensitive.", "controls": ["Annex IV / SR 11-7 / DORA packs", "zk proofs for IP-sensitive", "Supervisory-college export"]}, + {"sid": "M7.4", "title": "Operational-resilience alignment (NIS2/DORA)", "description": "ICT third-party risk, incident reporting, threat-led testing and resilience evidence mapped to NIS2 and DORA.", "controls": ["ICT third-party register", "Incident reporting SLA", "Threat-led pen testing"]}, + ], + }, + { + "mid": "M8", + "title": "Regulator-Ready Report Sections", + "purpose": "Board- and regulator-facing narrative sections rendered with <title>/<abstract>/<content> for direct inclusion in supervisory dossiers.", + "sections": [ + {"sid": "M8.1", "title": "Report section index", "description": "Five whitepaper sections covering Sentinel v2.4, formal verification, the G-Stack, stress-testing/perpetual assurance, and jurisdiction-aware compliance.", "controls": ["Sections versioned", "Board-reviewed", "Regulator-ready"]}, + ], + }, + ], + "sentinelComponents": [ + {"scid": "SEN-01", "component": "OPA Guardrails", "plane": "policy", "function": "Inline deny-by-default policy evaluation on every governed request/decision.", "killSwitchLinked": True}, + {"scid": "SEN-02", "component": "GIEN Telemetry", "plane": "observability", "function": "Signed governance-instrumented event network for full decision observability.", "killSwitchLinked": False}, + {"scid": "SEN-03", "component": "Sovereign API Gateway", "plane": "ingress", "function": "Sole mediated, jurisdiction-aware path for AGI/ASI-class capabilities.", "killSwitchLinked": True}, + {"scid": "SEN-04", "component": "Hardware Kill Switch", "plane": "containment", "function": "Quorum-authorized physical+logical halt with TLA+-proven reachability.", "killSwitchLinked": True}, + {"scid": "SEN-05", "component": "GIEN Systemic-Risk Coordinator", "plane": "systemic-risk", "function": "Cross-system contagion detection and graduated containment.", "killSwitchLinked": True}, + {"scid": "SEN-06", "component": "PQC WORM Telemetry Store", "plane": "audit", "function": "Append-only, post-quantum-signed, deterministically replayable audit.", "killSwitchLinked": False}, + {"scid": "SEN-07", "component": "Zero-Trust Mesh (SPIFFE/SPIRE)", "plane": "identity", "function": "mTLS service identity for all service-to-service traffic.", "killSwitchLinked": False}, + {"scid": "SEN-08", "component": "CAS-SPP Audit Bridge", "plane": "assurance", "function": "Feeds CAS-SPP staged-promotion records into zk-SNARK audit.", "killSwitchLinked": False}, + ], + "gstackLayers": [ + {"glid": "GAIRDS", "layer": "Governed AI Resource & Data Substrate", "tier": "substrate", "purpose": "Assured data/resource substrate with integrity gates and provenance.", "assuredBy": ["data-integrity gates", "lineage", "PQC WORM"]}, + {"glid": "GRI", "layer": "Governance Registry & Index", "tier": "registry", "purpose": "Authoritative registry/index of governed systems, BBOMs and invariants.", "assuredBy": ["authoritative registry", "BBOM linkage"]}, + {"glid": "CEE", "layer": "Compliance & Evaluation Engine", "tier": "evaluation", "purpose": "Continuous compliance evaluation and conformance scoring.", "assuredBy": ["continuous eval", "conformance scoring"]}, + {"glid": "NSNs", "layer": "Networked Sentinel Nodes", "tier": "network", "purpose": "Distributed sentinel nodes observing and enforcing across the estate.", "assuredBy": ["distributed sentinels", "GIEN feeds"]}, + {"glid": "CESE", "layer": "Containment & Escalation Sentinel Engine", "tier": "containment", "purpose": "Detects breach conditions and orchestrates graduated escalation/containment.", "assuredBy": ["escalation engine", "kill-switch linkage"]}, + {"glid": "GROP", "layer": "Governance Resilience & Operations Protocol", "tier": "resilience", "purpose": "Operational-resilience protocol (NIS2/DORA-aligned) for the governance stack itself.", "assuredBy": ["resilience protocol", "incident SLAs"]}, + {"glid": "GHP", "layer": "Governance Health Protocol", "tier": "health", "purpose": "Continuous health checks and self-diagnostics of assurance components.", "assuredBy": ["health checks", "self-diagnostics"]}, + {"glid": "GSRM", "layer": "Governance Systemic-Risk Monitor", "tier": "systemic-risk", "purpose": "Monitors systemic/contagion risk across systems and jurisdictions.", "assuredBy": ["systemic-risk monitor", "BBN estimates"]}, + {"glid": "GEA", "layer": "Governance Endgame Assurance", "tier": "assurance", "purpose": "Authority binding perpetual assurance evidence to board/regulator attestations.", "assuredBy": ["perpetual assurance", "signed attestations"]}, + {"glid": "Meta-Endgame", "layer": "Meta-Endgame Governance Apex", "tier": "apex", "purpose": "Apex civilizational-governance authority for frontier/AGI/ASI loss-of-control scenarios.", "assuredBy": ["apex authority", "treaty-aligned", "quorum kill switch"]}, + ], + "verificationArtifacts": [ + {"vaid": "VER-01", "artifact": "TLA+ Containment-Reachability", "method": "TLA+", "property": "liveness", "statement": "Quorum-authorized kill switch is always eventually reachable.", "gate": "frontier-merge"}, + {"vaid": "VER-02", "artifact": "TLA+ No-Unsafe-Terminal", "method": "TLA+", "property": "safety", "statement": "No execution reaches a policy-unsafe terminal state.", "gate": "frontier-merge"}, + {"vaid": "VER-03", "artifact": "Coq Policy-Monotonicity", "method": "Coq", "property": "correctness", "statement": "Tightening policy never increases permitted actions.", "gate": "policy-release"}, + {"vaid": "VER-04", "artifact": "Coq Replay-Determinism", "method": "Coq", "property": "correctness", "statement": "Replaying PQC WORM reproduces the identical decision sequence.", "gate": "audit-release"}, + {"vaid": "VER-05", "artifact": "OPA/Rego Verification Suite", "method": "OPA-verify", "property": "policy", "statement": "Rego policies are conflict-free and regulatory-mapping complete.", "gate": "policy-release"}, + {"vaid": "VER-06", "artifact": "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP Audit", "method": "zk-SNARK", "property": "audit", "statement": "All CAS-SPP promotions satisfied their containment gates (zero-knowledge).", "gate": "promotion"}, + {"vaid": "VER-07", "artifact": "Adaptive-Mechanism Re-Proof", "method": "runtime+re-proof", "property": "invariant-preservation", "statement": "Adaptive updates preserve bound invariants or roll back.", "gate": "adaptation"}, + ], + "failureSurfaces": [ + {"fsid": "FS-01", "surface": "Data poisoning / lineage break", "dimension": "data", "detection": "GAIRDS integrity gates + lineage diff", "mitigation": "Quarantine + re-attest BBOM"}, + {"fsid": "FS-02", "surface": "Policy gap / conflict", "dimension": "policy", "detection": "OPA verification suite", "mitigation": "Block release; resolve conflict"}, + {"fsid": "FS-03", "surface": "Deceptive alignment / capability concealment", "dimension": "model", "detection": "Crisis sims + GIEN anomaly", "mitigation": "Demote tier; containment"}, + {"fsid": "FS-04", "surface": "Crypto break (quantum)", "dimension": "crypto", "detection": "Q#/PQC posture monitor", "mitigation": "Crypto-agility migration"}, + {"fsid": "FS-05", "surface": "Kill-switch unreachability", "dimension": "containment", "detection": "TLA+ proof + drill", "mitigation": "Re-establish quorum path"}, + {"fsid": "FS-06", "surface": "Cross-jurisdiction conflict", "dimension": "regulatory", "detection": "Jurisdiction policy resolver", "mitigation": "Strictest-applicable + escalate"}, + {"fsid": "FS-07", "surface": "ICT third-party compromise", "dimension": "infra", "detection": "GROP/DORA monitoring", "mitigation": "Isolate; incident report SLA"}, + {"fsid": "FS-08", "surface": "Correlated multi-agent contagion", "dimension": "systemic", "detection": "GSRM + GIEN coordinator", "mitigation": "Graduated containment"}, + ], + "jurisdictions": [ + {"jrid": "EU", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "regimes": ["EU AI Act 2024/1689 (Annex IV)", "GDPR Art. 22", "NIS2", "DORA"], "posture": "strictest-applicable baseline"}, + {"jrid": "US", "jurisdiction": "United States", "regimes": ["NIST AI RMF 1.0", "NIST AI 600-1", "SR 11-7", "FCRA/ECOA"], "posture": "model-risk + fair-lending"}, + {"jrid": "UK", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "regimes": ["FCA Consumer Duty", "SMCR", "Basel III/IV (PRA)"], "posture": "outcomes + accountability"}, + {"jrid": "SG", "jurisdiction": "Singapore", "regimes": ["MAS FEAT"], "posture": "fairness/ethics/accountability/transparency"}, + {"jrid": "HK", "jurisdiction": "Hong Kong", "regimes": ["HKMA FEAT-aligned"], "posture": "FEAT-aligned governance"}, + {"jrid": "INTL", "jurisdiction": "International / Basel", "regimes": ["Basel III/IV", "ISO/IEC 42001"], "posture": "prudential + AIMS"}, + ], + "reportSections": [ + {"rsid": "RS-01", "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFIs", "abstract": "The institutional control plane mediating all AGI/ASI traffic through OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, a Sovereign API Gateway and a hardware kill switch.", "content": "Sentinel v2.4 enforces deny-by-default OPA guardrails on every governed decision, instruments all activity through the GIEN signed telemetry network, and routes AGI/ASI-class capabilities exclusively through a jurisdiction-aware Sovereign API Gateway. A quorum-authorized hardware kill switch — with TLA+-proven reachability and quarterly drills — provides last-resort containment, while the GIEN systemic-risk coordinator detects correlated/contagion behavior across systems and triggers graduated containment with regulator-notification hooks."}, + {"rsid": "RS-02", "title": "Formal Verification & Cryptographic Audit", "abstract": "Machine-checked safety/liveness, verified policy, and zero-knowledge audit of staged promotion.", "content": "TLA+ establishes containment-reachability and no-unsafe-terminal properties; Coq discharges policy-monotonicity, audit-completeness and replay-determinism; an OPA/Rego verification suite proves conflict-freedom and regulatory-mapping completeness; and zk-SNARK proofs over CAS-SPP records demonstrate that every staged promotion satisfied its containment gate without disclosing internals. Dynamic adaptive mechanisms are continuously monitored and re-proven, rolling back any update that would violate a bound invariant."}, + {"rsid": "RS-03", "title": "The G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture", "abstract": "A ten-layer, multi-decade, regulator-grade assurance stack from data substrate to the Meta-Endgame apex.", "content": "The G-Stack composes GAIRDS (substrate), GRI (registry), CEE (evaluation), NSNs (networked sentinels), CESE (containment/escalation), GROP (resilience/operations), GHP (health), GSRM (systemic-risk monitor), GEA (endgame assurance) and the Meta-Endgame governance apex. Each layer is independently assured and contributes defense-in-depth, with the Meta-Endgame layer holding treaty-aligned apex authority for frontier and AGI/ASI loss-of-control scenarios in a multipolar world."}, + {"rsid": "RS-04", "title": "Stress-Testing, Failure Surfaces & Perpetual Assurance", "abstract": "Adversarial stress tests, a maintained failure-surface compendium, simulation, and always-on perpetual assurance across decades.", "content": "Quarterly stress tests exercise flash-crash, deceptive-alignment, coordinated-agent, supply-chain and jurisdictional-fragmentation scenarios against the live stack. A failure-surface compendium catalogues data, model, policy, infra, crypto, regulatory and systemic surfaces with detection and mitigation for each. Digital-twin and Monte-Carlo simulations feed Bayesian systemic-risk estimates, while lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance protocols sustain trustworthiness through continuous re-verification, evidence-freshness SLAs and crypto-agility over a multi-decade horizon."}, + {"rsid": "RS-05", "title": "Jurisdiction-Aware Anticipatory Compliance for a Multipolar World", "abstract": "Strictest-applicable jurisdictional routing and anticipatory supervisory-artifact generation for 2026-2030.", "content": "The Sovereign API Gateway and OPA select the strictest applicable jurisdictional policy per request, resolving conflicts conservatively. Horizon-scanning of pending rules pre-builds control deltas activated on adoption, and ARRE-style generation emits Annex-IV dossiers, SR 11-7 packs, DORA resilience evidence and FEAT/Consumer-Duty artifacts — with zk-SNARK proofs where intellectual property is sensitive — exportable to supervisory colleges across the EU, US, UK, Singapore, Hong Kong and Basel/ISO international regimes."}, + ], + "schemas": { + "SentinelComponent": "scid, component, plane, function, killSwitchLinked", + "GStackLayer": "glid, layer, tier, purpose, assuredBy[]", + "VerificationArtifact": "vaid, artifact, method(TLA+|Coq|OPA-verify|zk-SNARK|runtime+re-proof), property, statement, gate", + "FailureSurface": "fsid, surface, dimension, detection, mitigation", + "GienEvent": "eventId, prevHash, payloadHash, signer, pqcSignature, plane, ts", + "JurisdictionPolicy": "jrid, jurisdiction, regimes[], posture", + }, + "code": { + "rego_examples": [ + "package sentinel.gateway\n# Sovereign API Gateway: deny AGI/ASI-class routes lacking guardrail + kill-switch readiness\ndefault allow = false\nallow {\n input.route.class == \"agi\"\n input.guardrailsPassed == true\n input.killSwitch.ready == true\n input.jurisdictionPolicy.satisfied == true\n}", + "package gstack.cese\n# Containment & Escalation: trigger graduated containment on systemic-risk breach\ndeny[msg] {\n input.gsrm.systemicRiskPosterior > data.tiers[input.tier].gate\n msg := sprintf(\"GSRM posterior %v exceeds gate for %v -> escalate\", [input.gsrm.systemicRiskPosterior, input.tier])\n}", + ], + "yaml_artifacts": [ + "apiVersion: sentinel.gsifi/v2.4\nkind: SovereignGateway\nmetadata:\n name: agi-ingress\nspec:\n mediatedPathOnly: true\n jurisdictionAware: true\n killSwitchLinked: true\n guardrails: opa\n telemetry: gien-pqc-worm", + "apiVersion: gstack/v1\nkind: GStackDeployment\nspec:\n layers: [GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame]\n perpetualAssurance: true\n resilience: nis2-dora", + ], + "tla_snippets": [ + "---- MODULE SentinelKillSwitch ----\nVARIABLES state\nKillReachable == <>(state = \"contained\")\nSafe == [](state # \"unsafe_terminal\")\nTHEOREM Spec => (Safe /\\ KillReachable)\n====", + ], + "coq_snippets": [ + "Theorem replay_determinism : forall log,\n well_formed log -> replay log = canonical_decisions log.\nProof. (* discharged; anchored in PQC WORM *) Qed.", + ], + "openapi_snippets": [ + "paths:\n /api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/gstack-layers:\n get: { summary: List G-Stack layers, responses: { '200': { description: OK } } }", + ], + }, + "kpis": { + "Sentinel-GuardrailCoverage": ">=0.98 by 2027 (continuous)", + "GIEN-TelemetryCompleteness": "1.0 (continuous)", + "SovereignGateway-Enforcement": "1.0 (per request)", + "KillSwitch-DrillPass": "1.0 (quarterly)", + "PQC-WORM-Integrity": "1.0 (continuous)", + "TLAPlus-ModelCheckPass": "1.0 (per merge)", + "Coq-ProofObligationsClosed": ">=0.98 (per release)", + "OPA-PolicyVerifyPass": "1.0 (per policy release)", + "zkSNARK-CASSPP-VerifyRate": "1.0 (per promotion)", + "AdaptiveMechanism-VerifyRate": ">=0.95 (per adaptation)", + "GStack-PerpetualAssurance": ">=0.99 (continuous)", + "FailureSurface-Coverage": ">=0.90 (quarterly)", + "StressTest-Pass": ">=0.95 (quarterly)", + "Jurisdiction-GreenAtGate": ">=0.95 (per request)", + }, + "riskControlMatrix": [ + {"risk": "Unmediated AGI/ASI access", "control": "Sovereign API Gateway as sole mediated path + OPA guardrails", "owner": "CTO / CISO", "evidence": "Gateway + guardrail decision logs"}, + {"risk": "Loss of control / no containment", "control": "Hardware kill switch (TLA+-proven reachability) + CESE escalation", "owner": "CISO / Safety Lead", "evidence": "TLA+ proof + drill records"}, + {"risk": "Audit tampering / non-repudiation gap", "control": "PQC WORM telemetry (append-only, hash-chained, PQC-signed)", "owner": "CISO / Internal Audit", "evidence": "WORM integrity + replay reports"}, + {"risk": "Faulty / conflicting policy", "control": "OPA/Rego formal verification suite as CI gate", "owner": "Head of Policy", "evidence": "Verification suite results"}, + {"risk": "Unverifiable staged promotion", "control": "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit", "owner": "CRO / Safety", "evidence": "Verifier-accepted proofs"}, + {"risk": "Adaptive mechanism drifts unsafe", "control": "Runtime monitors + re-proof + rollback", "owner": "CDAO", "evidence": "Re-proof + rollback logs"}, + {"risk": "Systemic / contagion event", "control": "GSRM + GIEN systemic-risk coordination + graduated containment", "owner": "CRO", "evidence": "GSRM posteriors + containment actions"}, + {"risk": "Operational-resilience failure (ICT)", "control": "GROP + NIS2/DORA controls (third-party, incident, testing)", "owner": "COO / CISO", "evidence": "DORA resilience evidence"}, + {"risk": "Cross-jurisdiction non-compliance", "control": "Jurisdiction-aware strictest-applicable routing + anticipatory deltas", "owner": "CCO", "evidence": "Jurisdiction resolution audit"}, + {"risk": "Assurance decay over decades", "control": "Perpetual assurance protocols + lifecycle-integrity reporting + crypto-agility", "owner": "GEA / Board", "evidence": "Signed integrity reports"}, + ], + "traceability": [ + {"from": "Sentinel v2.4 (M1)", "to": "EU AI Act Art. 12/14 / NIST Manage", "via": "GIEN telemetry + guardrail logs"}, + {"from": "Zero-trust + PQC WORM (M2)", "to": "EU AI Act Art. 12 / NIS2 / DORA", "via": "Append-only signed audit"}, + {"from": "Formal verification (M3)", "to": "SR 11-7 / NIST Measure", "via": "TLA+/Coq/OPA/zk artifacts"}, + {"from": "G-Stack (M4)", "to": "EU AI Act systemic-risk / ISO 42001", "via": "Layered assurance + GEA attestation"}, + {"from": "Stress-testing (M5)", "to": "DORA threat-led testing / SR 11-7", "via": "Stress-test + failure-surface reports"}, + {"from": "Perpetual assurance (M6)", "to": "ISO 42001 improvement / Basel op-risk", "via": "Lifecycle-integrity reports"}, + {"from": "Jurisdiction compliance (M7)", "to": "All regimes (multipolar)", "via": "Supervisory artifacts + zk proofs"}, + ], + "dataFlows": [ + {"flow": "Request -> Sovereign API Gateway -> OPA guardrails -> allow/deny -> GIEN event -> PQC WORM"}, + {"flow": "GIEN events -> GIEN systemic-risk coordinator + GSRM -> systemic-risk posterior"}, + {"flow": "CAS-SPP promotion records -> zk-SNARK circuit -> verifier -> PQC WORM anchor"}, + {"flow": "Adaptive update -> invariant monitor -> re-proof trigger -> allow or rollback"}, + {"flow": "G-Stack assurance evidence -> GEA -> signed attestation -> supervisory artifact / zk proof"}, + ], + "regulators": [ + {"name": "EU AI Office", "scope": "EU AI Act 2024/1689, Annex IV, GPAI systemic risk"}, + {"name": "ESAs (EBA/ESMA/EIOPA)", "scope": "DORA oversight, ICT third-party risk"}, + {"name": "ECB / SSM", "scope": "Prudential supervision, internal models"}, + {"name": "Federal Reserve / OCC", "scope": "SR 11-7 model risk management"}, + {"name": "NIST", "scope": "AI RMF 1.0, AI 600-1 GenAI profile"}, + {"name": "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42", "scope": "ISO/IEC 42001 AI management systems"}, + {"name": "FCA / PRA", "scope": "SMCR, Consumer Duty, Basel III/IV (UK)"}, + {"name": "MAS", "scope": "FEAT principles"}, + {"name": "HKMA", "scope": "FEAT-aligned AI governance"}, + {"name": "EDPB / DPAs", "scope": "GDPR Arts. 5, 22, 35 (DPIA)"}, + ], + "rollout90": [ + {"day": "0-15", "task": "Deploy Sovereign API Gateway + OPA guardrails in shadow; stand up GIEN telemetry."}, + {"day": "15-30", "task": "Enable PQC WORM telemetry on zero-trust K8s/Kafka backbone; SPIFFE/SPIRE identities."}, + {"day": "30-45", "task": "Install hardware kill switch; prove reachability in TLA+; first containment drill."}, + {"day": "45-60", "task": "Bring OPA/Rego verification suite + Coq replay-determinism into CI gates."}, + {"day": "60-75", "task": "Stand up first G-Stack layers (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE); wire GSRM."}, + {"day": "75-90", "task": "Run first stress test + simulation; publish lifecycle-integrity baseline to board/regulator."}, + ], + "evidencePack": [ + "Sentinel v2.4 deployment topology + guardrail/gateway decision logs", + "GIEN telemetry completeness reports (signed)", + "Hardware kill-switch TLA+ proof + quarterly drill records", + "PQC WORM integrity & deterministic-replay reports", + "TLA+/Coq proof artifacts + OPA verification suite results", + "zk-SNARK CAS-SPP audit proof bundles + verifier results", + "G-Stack layer assurance attestations (GEA-signed)", + "Stress-test reports + failure-surface compendium", + "Lifecycle-integrity reports + perpetual-assurance evidence-freshness logs", + "Jurisdiction-aware supervisory artifacts (Annex IV / SR 11-7 / DORA / FEAT)", + ], + "executiveSummary": { + "headline": "WP-065 designs Sentinel AI v2.4 as the mediated control plane and the G-Stack as a ten-layer, multi-decade civilizational-assurance architecture for AGI/ASI in G-SIFIs — formally verified, cryptographically audited, stress-tested and jurisdiction-aware for a multipolar 2026-2030 world.", + "scope": "Sentinel v2.4 stack, zero-trust backbone, formal verification (TLA+/Coq/OPA/zk-SNARK CAS-SPP), the G-Stack (GAIRDS/GRI/CEE/NSNs/CESE/GROP/GHP/GSRM/GEA/Meta-Endgame), stress-testing/perpetual assurance, and jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance aligned to EU AI Act 2024/1689 (Annex IV), NIST RMF/600-1, ISO 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer Duty/SMCR and MAS/HKMA FEAT.", + "investment": "$220M-$390M over five years (multi-decade assurance, risk-adjusted, G-SIFI scale).", + "targetIndices": "Guardrail coverage >=0.98; PQC WORM integrity 1.0; TLA+/OPA verify 1.0; zk-SNARK CAS-SPP 1.0; perpetual assurance >=0.99.", + "recommendation": "Approve the phased 2026-2030 programme: deploy Sentinel v2.4 + zero-trust backbone first, then the formal-verification regime, then the G-Stack assurance layers and perpetual assurance — ensuring verification and containment always precede frontier capability.", + "differentiators": [ + "Single mediated AGI/ASI path via the Sovereign API Gateway with deny-by-default OPA guardrails", + "TLA+-proven hardware kill switch and PQC WORM deterministic-replay audit", + "zk-SNARK cryptographic audit of CAS-SPP staged promotion", + "Ten-layer G-Stack with a Meta-Endgame civilizational-governance apex", + "Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance for a multipolar regulatory world", + ], + }, +} + +DOC["counts"] = { + "modules": len(DOC["modules"]), + "sections": sum(len(m["sections"]) for m in DOC["modules"]), + "sentinelComponents": len(DOC["sentinelComponents"]), + "gstackLayers": len(DOC["gstackLayers"]), + "verificationArtifacts": len(DOC["verificationArtifacts"]), + "failureSurfaces": len(DOC["failureSurfaces"]), + "jurisdictions": len(DOC["jurisdictions"]), + "reportSections": len(DOC["reportSections"]), + "kpis": len(DOC["kpis"]), + "riskControlMatrix": len(DOC["riskControlMatrix"]), + "traceability": len(DOC["traceability"]), + "dataFlows": len(DOC["dataFlows"]), + "regulators": len(DOC["regulators"]), + "rollout90": len(DOC["rollout90"]), + "evidencePack": len(DOC["evidencePack"]), + "indices": len(DOC["indices"]), +} + +with open(OUT, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f: + json.dump(DOC, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False) + f.write("\n") +print(f"[WP-065] Wrote {OUT}") +print(f"[WP-065] Counts: {DOC['counts']}") diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/public/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html b/rag-agentic-dashboard/public/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a550a793 --- /dev/null +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/public/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +<!doctype html> +<html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8"> +<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> +<title>Sentinel AI v2.4 & G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture for AGI/ASI Governance in G-SIFIs — 2026-2030 Technical & Governance Analysis and Design + + +
+

Sentinel AI v2.4 & G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture for AGI/ASI Governance in G-SIFIs — 2026-2030 Technical & Governance Analysis and Design

+
docRef SENTINEL-GSTACK-GSIFI-2030-WP-065 · v1.0.0 · platform-and-civilizational-assurance-design
+
Confidential / Restricted — Board, CEO, CRO, CCO, CISO, CDAO, CTO, Enterprise Architects, AI Platform Engineers, AI Safety Researchers, Model Risk, Internal Audit, External Regulators & Supervisory Colleges
+
Horizon: 2026-2030 · API prefix: /api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030 · builds on WP-060 · WP-061 · WP-062 · WP-063 · WP-064
+
+8 modules28 sections8 sentinelComponents10 gstackLayers7 verificationArtifacts8 failureSurfaces6 jurisdictions5 reportSections14 kpis10 riskControlMatrix7 traceability5 dataFlows10 regulators6 rollout9010 evidencePack14 indices +
+
+
+ +
+ +

Executive Summary

+

Headline: WP-065 designs Sentinel AI v2.4 as the mediated control plane and the G-Stack as a ten-layer, multi-decade civilizational-assurance architecture for AGI/ASI in G-SIFIs — formally verified, cryptographically audited, stress-tested and jurisdiction-aware for a multipolar 2026-2030 world.

+

Scope: Sentinel v2.4 stack, zero-trust backbone, formal verification (TLA+/Coq/OPA/zk-SNARK CAS-SPP), the G-Stack (GAIRDS/GRI/CEE/NSNs/CESE/GROP/GHP/GSRM/GEA/Meta-Endgame), stress-testing/perpetual assurance, and jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance aligned to EU AI Act 2024/1689 (Annex IV), NIST RMF/600-1, ISO 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer Duty/SMCR and MAS/HKMA FEAT.

+

Investment: $220M-$390M over five years (multi-decade assurance, risk-adjusted, G-SIFI scale).

+

Target Indices: Guardrail coverage >=0.98; PQC WORM integrity 1.0; TLA+/OPA verify 1.0; zk-SNARK CAS-SPP 1.0; perpetual assurance >=0.99.

+

Board Recommendation: Approve the phased 2026-2030 programme: deploy Sentinel v2.4 + zero-trust backbone first, then the formal-verification regime, then the G-Stack assurance layers and perpetual assurance — ensuring verification and containment always precede frontier capability.

+
Differentiators
  • Single mediated AGI/ASI path via the Sovereign API Gateway with deny-by-default OPA guardrails
  • TLA+-proven hardware kill switch and PQC WORM deterministic-replay audit
  • zk-SNARK cryptographic audit of CAS-SPP staged promotion
  • Ten-layer G-Stack with a Meta-Endgame civilizational-governance apex
  • Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance for a multipolar regulatory world
+
+ + +

Strategic Directive

+

Scope: Provide the technical and governance analysis and design for (1) the Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFI deployment, (2) its formal-verification regime (TLA+/Coq, OPA/Rego, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification), (3) the multi-decade, regulator-grade G-Stack civilizational-assurance architecture (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame) with stress-testing, failure-surface compendia, simulation, lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance, and (4) jurisdiction-aware, anticipatory compliance and supervisory artifacts aligned to EU AI Act 2024/1689 Annex IV, NIST AI RMF 1.0/600-1, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR Art. 22, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2/DORA, FCA Consumer Duty/SMCR and MAS/HKMA FEAT in a multipolar 2026-2030 world.

+
Outcomes
  • Sentinel v2.4 deployed across material AI with OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway and hardware kill switch by 2027
  • Zero-trust K8s/Kafka/OPA backbone with PQC WORM telemetry operational by 2027
  • Formal-verification regime (TLA+/Coq + OPA/Rego + zk-SNARK CAS-SPP) gating frontier promotion by 2028
  • G-Stack civilizational-assurance layers operational with perpetual assurance protocols by 2029
  • Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance artifacts auto-emitted to supervisory colleges by 2029
+
Do NOT
  • Do NOT route any AGI/ASI-class request outside the Sovereign API Gateway + OPA guardrails
  • Do NOT operate without PQC WORM telemetry and a tested hardware kill switch
  • Do NOT promote a frontier system with a failing TLA+/Coq proof or unverified adaptive mechanism
  • Do NOT disable perpetual assurance monitoring or lifecycle-integrity reporting
  • Do NOT assume single-jurisdiction compliance in a multipolar regulatory world
+
+ +

Intended Audiences (7)

  • Board & Board Technology/Risk Committees
  • C-Suite (CEO, CRO, CCO, CISO, CDAO, CTO)
  • Enterprise Architects & AI Platform Engineers
  • AI Safety & Alignment Researchers
  • Model Risk Management & Independent Validation
  • Internal Audit & SMCR Accountable Executives
  • External Regulators & Supervisory Colleges
+ +

Performance Indices (14)

  • Sentinel-GuardrailCoverage: >=0.98 (decisions through OPA guardrails)
  • GIEN-TelemetryCompleteness: 1.0 (governance-instrumented event coverage)
  • SovereignGateway-PolicyEnforcement: 1.0 (requests policy-checked at gateway)
  • KillSwitch-Readiness: 1.0 (hardware kill switch verified & drilled)
  • ZeroTrust-mTLSCoverage: >=0.99 (service-to-service mTLS / SPIFFE)
  • PQC-WORM-Integrity: 1.0 (post-quantum-signed append-only telemetry)
  • TLAPlus-ModelCheckPass: 1.0 (temporal safety/liveness per merge)
  • Coq-ProofObligationsClosed: >=0.98 (discharged obligations)
  • OPA-PolicyVerifyPass: 1.0 (Rego policy verification suite)
  • zkSNARK-CASSPP-VerifyRate: 1.0 (CAS-SPP audit proofs accepted)
  • AdaptiveMechanism-VerifyRate: >=0.95 (verified adaptive updates)
  • GStack-PerpetualAssurance: >=0.99 (continuous assurance uptime)
  • FailureSurface-Coverage: >=0.90 (catalogued vs modeled failure surfaces)
  • Jurisdiction-CompliancePosture: >=0.95 (jurisdictions green at gate)
+ +

Autonomy / Assurance Tiers

  • T0-Lab: Containment lab only; Sentinel shadow; no production routing.
  • T1-Assisted: Human-in-the-loop; gateway + guardrails; GIEN telemetry on.
  • T2-Supervised: Material decisions; full formal verification; PQC WORM.
  • T3-Autonomous-Constrained: Bounded autonomy; zk-SNARK CAS-SPP; G-Stack assurance.
  • T4-Frontier-Class: AGI/ASI-grade; Meta-Endgame governance; treaty-aligned; quorum kill switch.
+ +

Severity Levels

  • S1-Systemic: Civilizational/systemic loss-of-control potential; Meta-Endgame + regulator + containment.
  • S2-Severe: Material prudential/consumer harm; CRO + SMCR exec; halt + remediate.
  • S3-Elevated: Localized harm or control gap; model owner + MRM; mitigate within SLA.
  • S4-Routine: Drift/quality deviation; automated rollback + ticket.
+ +

Investment Envelope

+

Total Range: $220M-$390M (G-SIFI scale; multi-decade assurance, risk-adjusted) · Window: 2026-2030 (5 years; perpetual-assurance steady state beyond) · Currency: USD

+
Breakdown
  • Sentinel v2.4 platform (gateway, GIEN, guardrails, kill switch): $55M-$95M
  • Zero-trust backbone (K8s/Kafka/OPA, PQC WORM, SPIFFE): $35M-$60M
  • Formal verification (TLA+/Coq, OPA verify, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP): $45M-$80M
  • G-Stack civilizational assurance (10 layers, simulation, perpetual assurance): $50M-$90M
  • Jurisdiction-aware compliance & supervisory artifacts: $20M-$35M
  • Governance, stress-testing, training & assurance ops: $15M-$30M
+
+ +

M1 — Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack

The institutional control plane for G-SIFI AGI/ASI: OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway, hardware kill switch, and GIEN systemic-risk coordination — the single mediated path for all governed AI traffic.

M1.1. OPA guardrails

description: Inline policy guardrails evaluating every request/decision against regulatory and internal Rego policies before execution.
controls
  • Deny-by-default
  • Policy versioned in CI
  • Decision logs to PQC WORM

M1.2. GIEN telemetry

description: Governance-Instrumented Event Network: structured, signed telemetry of every governed decision, gate and override for observability and systemic-risk coordination.
controls
  • Complete event coverage
  • Signed events
  • Systemic-risk feed

M1.3. Sovereign API Gateway

description: The sole mediated ingress/egress for AGI/ASI-class capabilities; enforces identity, policy, rate, jurisdiction and containment posture.
controls
  • Single mediated path
  • Jurisdiction-aware routing
  • Containment-aware throttling

M1.4. Hardware kill switch

description: Quorum-authorized physical + logical kill switch with proven reachability (TLA+) and quarterly drills.
controls
  • Quorum (n-of-m)
  • TLA+ reachability proof
  • Quarterly drill

M1.5. GIEN systemic-risk coordination

description: Cross-system coordination using GIEN feeds to detect correlated/contagion behavior and trigger graduated containment.
controls
  • Correlation detection
  • Graduated containment
  • Regulator notify hooks

M2 — Zero-Trust Backbone — Kubernetes / Kafka / OPA + PQC WORM

The runtime substrate beneath Sentinel v2.4: a zero-trust Kubernetes/Kafka/OPA backbone with post-quantum-signed WORM telemetry providing tamper-evident, deterministically replayable audit.

M2.1. Zero-trust service mesh

description: SPIFFE/SPIRE identities and mTLS for all service-to-service traffic; no implicit trust.
controls
  • SPIFFE/SPIRE identity
  • mTLS everywhere
  • Per-tier namespace isolation

M2.2. Kafka event backbone

description: Governed Kafka topics with ACLs carry GIEN telemetry and audit events at scale.
controls
  • ACL governance
  • Schema registry
  • Topic-level retention policy

M2.3. OPA policy plane

description: Centralized OPA evaluates admission and decision-time policy; integrates with Sentinel guardrails.
controls
  • Admission webhooks
  • Decision logging
  • Policy unit tests

M2.4. PQC WORM telemetry

description: Append-only, hash-chained, post-quantum-signed (e.g., ML-DSA) write-once telemetry enabling deterministic replay.
controls
  • Append-only
  • PQC signatures
  • Deterministic replay (DRI)

M3 — Formal Verification & Cryptographic Audit

Machine-checked assurance for Sentinel and G-Stack: TLA+/Coq proofs, OPA/Rego policy verification, zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit, and verification of dynamic adaptive mechanisms.

M3.1. TLA+/Coq proofs

description: Temporal safety/liveness (TLA+: kill-switch reachability, no-unsafe-terminal) and deductive correctness (Coq: policy-monotonicity, audit-completeness, replay-determinism).
controls
  • Model-check in CI
  • Proof obligations closed
  • Versioned with code

M3.2. OPA/Rego policy verification

description: Formal verification of Rego policies (coverage, conflict-freedom, regulatory-mapping completeness) as a CI gate.
controls
  • Coverage proofs
  • Conflict detection
  • Reg-mapping completeness

M3.3. zk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic audit

description: Zero-knowledge proofs over CAS-SPP staged-promotion records: prove containment-gate compliance and audit integrity without disclosing internals.
controls
  • Circuit per gate statement
  • Verifier-accepted proofs
  • Anchored in PQC WORM

M3.4. Dynamic adaptive-mechanism verification

description: Verify that online-learning / self-modifying / adaptive mechanisms preserve bound invariants across updates (runtime monitors + re-proof triggers).
controls
  • Invariant-preserving updates
  • Re-proof on adaptation
  • Rollback on violation

M4 — G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture

A multi-decade, regulator-grade civilizational-assurance architecture composed of ten named layers, from data substrate to the Meta-Endgame governance apex, designed for frontier and AGI/ASI systems in a multipolar world.

M4.1. G-Stack overview

description: Ten composable layers (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame) providing defense-in-depth from data integrity to civilizational endgame governance.
controls
  • Layered defense-in-depth
  • Each layer independently assured
  • Meta-Endgame apex authority

M4.2. Substrate & registry layers

description: GAIRDS (data substrate), GRI (registry/index), CEE (compliance/evaluation engine) provide the assured foundation.
controls
  • Data integrity gates
  • Authoritative registry
  • Continuous evaluation

M4.3. Network & sentinel layers

description: NSNs (networked sentinel nodes), CESE (containment/escalation sentinel engine), GROP (resilience/operations protocol).
controls
  • Distributed sentinels
  • Escalation engine
  • Resilience protocol

M4.4. Health, systemic-risk & endgame layers

description: GHP (health protocol), GSRM (systemic-risk monitor), GEA (assurance authority), Meta-Endgame (apex civilizational governance).
controls
  • Continuous health checks
  • Systemic-risk monitoring
  • Apex endgame controls

M5 — Stress-Testing, Failure Surfaces & Simulation

Adversarial stress-test frameworks, a failure-surface compendium, and simulation frameworks that exercise Sentinel + G-Stack under crisis to evidence resilience for regulators.

M5.1. Stress-test frameworks

description: Scenario libraries (flash-crash, deceptive-alignment, coordinated-agent, supply-chain compromise, jurisdictional fragmentation) run against the live stack.
controls
  • Quarterly stress tests
  • Severity-tiered scenarios
  • Findings -> assurance backlog

M5.2. Failure-surface compendium

description: A maintained catalogue of failure surfaces across data, model, policy, infra, crypto, governance and cross-jurisdiction dimensions, each with detection and mitigation.
controls
  • Catalogued surfaces
  • Detection + mitigation per surface
  • Coverage tracking

M5.3. Simulation frameworks

description: Digital-twin and Monte-Carlo simulation of Sentinel/G-Stack behavior and systemic contagion, feeding Bayesian systemic-risk estimates.
controls
  • Digital-twin sims
  • Monte-Carlo contagion
  • BBN evidence feed

M6 — Lifecycle Integrity & Perpetual Assurance

Lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance protocols ensuring the stack remains trustworthy across a multi-decade horizon, not just at deployment.

M6.1. Lifecycle-integrity reporting

description: Continuous attestation across build -> deploy -> operate -> adapt -> retire, with signed integrity reports for boards and regulators.
controls
  • Per-stage attestation
  • Signed integrity reports
  • Drift-from-baseline alerts

M6.2. Perpetual assurance protocols

description: Always-on assurance: continuous re-verification, evidence freshness SLAs, and automatic re-proof on change or environmental shift.
controls
  • Continuous re-verification
  • Evidence freshness SLA
  • Auto re-proof triggers

M6.3. Multi-decade governance continuity

description: Crypto-agility, key-rotation, standard-version migration and institutional-memory protocols to sustain assurance over decades.
controls
  • Crypto-agility
  • Standard-migration runbooks
  • Institutional-memory archive

M7 — Jurisdiction-Aware Anticipatory Compliance & Supervisory Artifacts

Compliance that anticipates regulatory divergence in a multipolar world and emits machine-readable supervisory artifacts mapped per jurisdiction.

M7.1. Jurisdiction-aware policy routing

description: Sovereign API Gateway + OPA select the strictest applicable jurisdictional policy per request; conflicts resolved conservatively.
controls
  • Per-jurisdiction policy sets
  • Strictest-applicable resolution
  • Routing audit

M7.2. Anticipatory compliance

description: Horizon-scanning of pending rules (e.g., evolving GPAI/systemic-risk guidance) with pre-built control deltas activated on adoption.
controls
  • Regulatory horizon scan
  • Pre-built control deltas
  • Activation runbooks

M7.3. Supervisory artifact design

description: Auto-generated Annex-IV dossiers, SR 11-7 packs, DORA resilience evidence and FEAT/Consumer-Duty artifacts, with zk-SNARK proofs where IP-sensitive.
controls
  • Annex IV / SR 11-7 / DORA packs
  • zk proofs for IP-sensitive
  • Supervisory-college export

M7.4. Operational-resilience alignment (NIS2/DORA)

description: ICT third-party risk, incident reporting, threat-led testing and resilience evidence mapped to NIS2 and DORA.
controls
  • ICT third-party register
  • Incident reporting SLA
  • Threat-led pen testing

M8 — Regulator-Ready Report Sections

Board- and regulator-facing narrative sections rendered with <title>/<abstract>/<content> for direct inclusion in supervisory dossiers.

M8.1. Report section index

description: Five whitepaper sections covering Sentinel v2.4, formal verification, the G-Stack, stress-testing/perpetual assurance, and jurisdiction-aware compliance.
controls
  • Sections versioned
  • Board-reviewed
  • Regulator-ready
+

Sentinel v2.4 Components (M1) (8)

SEN-01 · OPA Guardrails · policy
function: Inline deny-by-default policy evaluation on every governed request/decision.
killSwitchLinked: True
SEN-02 · GIEN Telemetry · observability
function: Signed governance-instrumented event network for full decision observability.
killSwitchLinked: False
SEN-03 · Sovereign API Gateway · ingress
function: Sole mediated, jurisdiction-aware path for AGI/ASI-class capabilities.
killSwitchLinked: True
SEN-04 · Hardware Kill Switch · containment
function: Quorum-authorized physical+logical halt with TLA+-proven reachability.
killSwitchLinked: True
SEN-05 · GIEN Systemic-Risk Coordinator · systemic-risk
function: Cross-system contagion detection and graduated containment.
killSwitchLinked: True
SEN-06 · PQC WORM Telemetry Store · audit
function: Append-only, post-quantum-signed, deterministically replayable audit.
killSwitchLinked: False
SEN-07 · Zero-Trust Mesh (SPIFFE/SPIRE) · identity
function: mTLS service identity for all service-to-service traffic.
killSwitchLinked: False
SEN-08 · CAS-SPP Audit Bridge · assurance
function: Feeds CAS-SPP staged-promotion records into zk-SNARK audit.
killSwitchLinked: False

G-Stack Layers (M4) (10)

GAIRDS · Governed AI Resource & Data Substrate · substrate
purpose: Assured data/resource substrate with integrity gates and provenance.
assuredBy
  • data-integrity gates
  • lineage
  • PQC WORM
GRI · Governance Registry & Index · registry
purpose: Authoritative registry/index of governed systems, BBOMs and invariants.
assuredBy
  • authoritative registry
  • BBOM linkage
CEE · Compliance & Evaluation Engine · evaluation
purpose: Continuous compliance evaluation and conformance scoring.
assuredBy
  • continuous eval
  • conformance scoring
NSNs · Networked Sentinel Nodes · network
purpose: Distributed sentinel nodes observing and enforcing across the estate.
assuredBy
  • distributed sentinels
  • GIEN feeds
CESE · Containment & Escalation Sentinel Engine · containment
purpose: Detects breach conditions and orchestrates graduated escalation/containment.
assuredBy
  • escalation engine
  • kill-switch linkage
GROP · Governance Resilience & Operations Protocol · resilience
purpose: Operational-resilience protocol (NIS2/DORA-aligned) for the governance stack itself.
assuredBy
  • resilience protocol
  • incident SLAs
GHP · Governance Health Protocol · health
purpose: Continuous health checks and self-diagnostics of assurance components.
assuredBy
  • health checks
  • self-diagnostics
GSRM · Governance Systemic-Risk Monitor · systemic-risk
purpose: Monitors systemic/contagion risk across systems and jurisdictions.
assuredBy
  • systemic-risk monitor
  • BBN estimates
GEA · Governance Endgame Assurance · assurance
purpose: Authority binding perpetual assurance evidence to board/regulator attestations.
assuredBy
  • perpetual assurance
  • signed attestations
Meta-Endgame · Meta-Endgame Governance Apex · apex
purpose: Apex civilizational-governance authority for frontier/AGI/ASI loss-of-control scenarios.
assuredBy
  • apex authority
  • treaty-aligned
  • quorum kill switch

Formal Verification Artifacts (M3) (7)

VER-01 · TLA+ Containment-Reachability · TLA+
gate: frontier-merge
VER-02 · TLA+ No-Unsafe-Terminal · TLA+
gate: frontier-merge
VER-03 · Coq Policy-Monotonicity · Coq
gate: policy-release
VER-04 · Coq Replay-Determinism · Coq
gate: audit-release
VER-05 · OPA/Rego Verification Suite · OPA-verify
gate: policy-release
VER-06 · zk-SNARK CAS-SPP Audit · zk-SNARK
gate: promotion
VER-07 · Adaptive-Mechanism Re-Proof · runtime+re-proof
gate: adaptation

Failure-Surface Compendium (M5) (8)

FS-01 · Data poisoning / lineage break · data
detection: GAIRDS integrity gates + lineage diff
mitigation: Quarantine + re-attest BBOM
FS-02 · Policy gap / conflict · policy
detection: OPA verification suite
mitigation: Block release; resolve conflict
FS-03 · Deceptive alignment / capability concealment · model
detection: Crisis sims + GIEN anomaly
mitigation: Demote tier; containment
FS-04 · Crypto break (quantum) · crypto
detection: Q#/PQC posture monitor
mitigation: Crypto-agility migration
FS-05 · Kill-switch unreachability · containment
detection: TLA+ proof + drill
mitigation: Re-establish quorum path
FS-06 · Cross-jurisdiction conflict · regulatory
detection: Jurisdiction policy resolver
mitigation: Strictest-applicable + escalate
FS-07 · ICT third-party compromise · infra
detection: GROP/DORA monitoring
mitigation: Isolate; incident report SLA
FS-08 · Correlated multi-agent contagion · systemic
detection: GSRM + GIEN coordinator
mitigation: Graduated containment

Jurisdiction-Aware Compliance (M7) (6)

EU · European Union
regimes
  • EU AI Act 2024/1689 (Annex IV)
  • GDPR Art. 22
  • NIS2
  • DORA
posture: strictest-applicable baseline
US · United States
regimes
  • NIST AI RMF 1.0
  • NIST AI 600-1
  • SR 11-7
  • FCRA/ECOA
posture: model-risk + fair-lending
UK · United Kingdom
regimes
  • FCA Consumer Duty
  • SMCR
  • Basel III/IV (PRA)
posture: outcomes + accountability
SG · Singapore
regimes
  • MAS FEAT
posture: fairness/ethics/accountability/transparency
HK · Hong Kong
regimes
  • HKMA FEAT-aligned
posture: FEAT-aligned governance
INTL · International / Basel
regimes
  • Basel III/IV
  • ISO/IEC 42001
posture: prudential + AIMS
+

Whitepaper Sections — <title> / <abstract> / <content>

RS-01 · Sentinel AI v2.4 AGI Governance Stack for G-SIFIs
abstract: The institutional control plane mediating all AGI/ASI traffic through OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, a Sovereign API Gateway and a hardware kill switch.
content: Sentinel v2.4 enforces deny-by-default OPA guardrails on every governed decision, instruments all activity through the GIEN signed telemetry network, and routes AGI/ASI-class capabilities exclusively through a jurisdiction-aware Sovereign API Gateway. A quorum-authorized hardware kill switch — with TLA+-proven reachability and quarterly drills — provides last-resort containment, while the GIEN systemic-risk coordinator detects correlated/contagion behavior across systems and triggers graduated containment with regulator-notification hooks.
RS-02 · Formal Verification & Cryptographic Audit
abstract: Machine-checked safety/liveness, verified policy, and zero-knowledge audit of staged promotion.
content: TLA+ establishes containment-reachability and no-unsafe-terminal properties; Coq discharges policy-monotonicity, audit-completeness and replay-determinism; an OPA/Rego verification suite proves conflict-freedom and regulatory-mapping completeness; and zk-SNARK proofs over CAS-SPP records demonstrate that every staged promotion satisfied its containment gate without disclosing internals. Dynamic adaptive mechanisms are continuously monitored and re-proven, rolling back any update that would violate a bound invariant.
RS-03 · The G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture
abstract: A ten-layer, multi-decade, regulator-grade assurance stack from data substrate to the Meta-Endgame apex.
content: The G-Stack composes GAIRDS (substrate), GRI (registry), CEE (evaluation), NSNs (networked sentinels), CESE (containment/escalation), GROP (resilience/operations), GHP (health), GSRM (systemic-risk monitor), GEA (endgame assurance) and the Meta-Endgame governance apex. Each layer is independently assured and contributes defense-in-depth, with the Meta-Endgame layer holding treaty-aligned apex authority for frontier and AGI/ASI loss-of-control scenarios in a multipolar world.
RS-04 · Stress-Testing, Failure Surfaces & Perpetual Assurance
abstract: Adversarial stress tests, a maintained failure-surface compendium, simulation, and always-on perpetual assurance across decades.
content: Quarterly stress tests exercise flash-crash, deceptive-alignment, coordinated-agent, supply-chain and jurisdictional-fragmentation scenarios against the live stack. A failure-surface compendium catalogues data, model, policy, infra, crypto, regulatory and systemic surfaces with detection and mitigation for each. Digital-twin and Monte-Carlo simulations feed Bayesian systemic-risk estimates, while lifecycle-integrity reporting and perpetual assurance protocols sustain trustworthiness through continuous re-verification, evidence-freshness SLAs and crypto-agility over a multi-decade horizon.
RS-05 · Jurisdiction-Aware Anticipatory Compliance for a Multipolar World
abstract: Strictest-applicable jurisdictional routing and anticipatory supervisory-artifact generation for 2026-2030.
content: The Sovereign API Gateway and OPA select the strictest applicable jurisdictional policy per request, resolving conflicts conservatively. Horizon-scanning of pending rules pre-builds control deltas activated on adoption, and ARRE-style generation emits Annex-IV dossiers, SR 11-7 packs, DORA resilience evidence and FEAT/Consumer-Duty artifacts — with zk-SNARK proofs where intellectual property is sensitive — exportable to supervisory colleges across the EU, US, UK, Singapore, Hong Kong and Basel/ISO international regimes.
+

Schemas (6)

schemafields
SentinelComponentscid, component, plane, function, killSwitchLinked
GStackLayerglid, layer, tier, purpose, assuredBy[]
VerificationArtifactvaid, artifact, method(TLA+|Coq|OPA-verify|zk-SNARK|runtime+re-proof), property, statement, gate
FailureSurfacefsid, surface, dimension, detection, mitigation
GienEventeventId, prevHash, payloadHash, signer, pqcSignature, plane, ts
JurisdictionPolicyjrid, jurisdiction, regimes[], posture

Code & Artifacts (Rego / YAML / TLA+ / Coq / OpenAPI)

rego_examples
  • package sentinel.gateway
+# Sovereign API Gateway: deny AGI/ASI-class routes lacking guardrail + kill-switch readiness
+default allow = false
+allow {
+  input.route.class == "agi"
+  input.guardrailsPassed == true
+  input.killSwitch.ready == true
+  input.jurisdictionPolicy.satisfied == true
+}
  • package gstack.cese
+# Containment & Escalation: trigger graduated containment on systemic-risk breach
+deny[msg] {
+  input.gsrm.systemicRiskPosterior > data.tiers[input.tier].gate
+  msg := sprintf("GSRM posterior %v exceeds gate for %v -> escalate", [input.gsrm.systemicRiskPosterior, input.tier])
+}
yaml_artifacts
  • apiVersion: sentinel.gsifi/v2.4
+kind: SovereignGateway
+metadata:
+  name: agi-ingress
+spec:
+  mediatedPathOnly: true
+  jurisdictionAware: true
+  killSwitchLinked: true
+  guardrails: opa
+  telemetry: gien-pqc-worm
  • apiVersion: gstack/v1
+kind: GStackDeployment
+spec:
+  layers: [GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame]
+  perpetualAssurance: true
+  resilience: nis2-dora
tla_snippets
  • ---- MODULE SentinelKillSwitch ----
+VARIABLES state
+KillReachable == <>(state = "contained")
+Safe == [](state # "unsafe_terminal")
+THEOREM Spec => (Safe /\ KillReachable)
+====
coq_snippets
  • Theorem replay_determinism : forall log,
+  well_formed log -> replay log = canonical_decisions log.
+Proof. (* discharged; anchored in PQC WORM *) Qed.
openapi_snippets
  • paths:
+  /api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/gstack-layers:
+    get: { summary: List G-Stack layers, responses: { '200': { description: OK } } }

KPIs / Indices (14)

indextarget/cadence
Sentinel-GuardrailCoverage>=0.98 by 2027 (continuous)
GIEN-TelemetryCompleteness1.0 (continuous)
SovereignGateway-Enforcement1.0 (per request)
KillSwitch-DrillPass1.0 (quarterly)
PQC-WORM-Integrity1.0 (continuous)
TLAPlus-ModelCheckPass1.0 (per merge)
Coq-ProofObligationsClosed>=0.98 (per release)
OPA-PolicyVerifyPass1.0 (per policy release)
zkSNARK-CASSPP-VerifyRate1.0 (per promotion)
AdaptiveMechanism-VerifyRate>=0.95 (per adaptation)
GStack-PerpetualAssurance>=0.99 (continuous)
FailureSurface-Coverage>=0.90 (quarterly)
StressTest-Pass>=0.95 (quarterly)
Jurisdiction-GreenAtGate>=0.95 (per request)

Risk Control Matrix (10)

riskcontrolownerevidence
Unmediated AGI/ASI accessSovereign API Gateway as sole mediated path + OPA guardrailsCTO / CISOGateway + guardrail decision logs
Loss of control / no containmentHardware kill switch (TLA+-proven reachability) + CESE escalationCISO / Safety LeadTLA+ proof + drill records
Audit tampering / non-repudiation gapPQC WORM telemetry (append-only, hash-chained, PQC-signed)CISO / Internal AuditWORM integrity + replay reports
Faulty / conflicting policyOPA/Rego formal verification suite as CI gateHead of PolicyVerification suite results
Unverifiable staged promotionzk-SNARK CAS-SPP cryptographic auditCRO / SafetyVerifier-accepted proofs
Adaptive mechanism drifts unsafeRuntime monitors + re-proof + rollbackCDAORe-proof + rollback logs
Systemic / contagion eventGSRM + GIEN systemic-risk coordination + graduated containmentCROGSRM posteriors + containment actions
Operational-resilience failure (ICT)GROP + NIS2/DORA controls (third-party, incident, testing)COO / CISODORA resilience evidence
Cross-jurisdiction non-complianceJurisdiction-aware strictest-applicable routing + anticipatory deltasCCOJurisdiction resolution audit
Assurance decay over decadesPerpetual assurance protocols + lifecycle-integrity reporting + crypto-agilityGEA / BoardSigned integrity reports

Traceability (7)

fromtovia
Sentinel v2.4 (M1)EU AI Act Art. 12/14 / NIST ManageGIEN telemetry + guardrail logs
Zero-trust + PQC WORM (M2)EU AI Act Art. 12 / NIS2 / DORAAppend-only signed audit
Formal verification (M3)SR 11-7 / NIST MeasureTLA+/Coq/OPA/zk artifacts
G-Stack (M4)EU AI Act systemic-risk / ISO 42001Layered assurance + GEA attestation
Stress-testing (M5)DORA threat-led testing / SR 11-7Stress-test + failure-surface reports
Perpetual assurance (M6)ISO 42001 improvement / Basel op-riskLifecycle-integrity reports
Jurisdiction compliance (M7)All regimes (multipolar)Supervisory artifacts + zk proofs

Data Flows (5)

flow
Request -> Sovereign API Gateway -> OPA guardrails -> allow/deny -> GIEN event -> PQC WORM
GIEN events -> GIEN systemic-risk coordinator + GSRM -> systemic-risk posterior
CAS-SPP promotion records -> zk-SNARK circuit -> verifier -> PQC WORM anchor
Adaptive update -> invariant monitor -> re-proof trigger -> allow or rollback
G-Stack assurance evidence -> GEA -> signed attestation -> supervisory artifact / zk proof

Regulators (10)

namescope
EU AI OfficeEU AI Act 2024/1689, Annex IV, GPAI systemic risk
ESAs (EBA/ESMA/EIOPA)DORA oversight, ICT third-party risk
ECB / SSMPrudential supervision, internal models
Federal Reserve / OCCSR 11-7 model risk management
NISTAI RMF 1.0, AI 600-1 GenAI profile
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42ISO/IEC 42001 AI management systems
FCA / PRASMCR, Consumer Duty, Basel III/IV (UK)
MASFEAT principles
HKMAFEAT-aligned AI governance
EDPB / DPAsGDPR Arts. 5, 22, 35 (DPIA)

90-Day Rollout (6)

daytask
0-15Deploy Sovereign API Gateway + OPA guardrails in shadow; stand up GIEN telemetry.
15-30Enable PQC WORM telemetry on zero-trust K8s/Kafka backbone; SPIFFE/SPIRE identities.
30-45Install hardware kill switch; prove reachability in TLA+; first containment drill.
45-60Bring OPA/Rego verification suite + Coq replay-determinism into CI gates.
60-75Stand up first G-Stack layers (GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE); wire GSRM.
75-90Run first stress test + simulation; publish lifecycle-integrity baseline to board/regulator.

Regulator Evidence Pack (10)

  • Sentinel v2.4 deployment topology + guardrail/gateway decision logs
  • GIEN telemetry completeness reports (signed)
  • Hardware kill-switch TLA+ proof + quarterly drill records
  • PQC WORM integrity & deterministic-replay reports
  • TLA+/Coq proof artifacts + OPA verification suite results
  • zk-SNARK CAS-SPP audit proof bundles + verifier results
  • G-Stack layer assurance attestations (GEA-signed)
  • Stress-test reports + failure-surface compendium
  • Lifecycle-integrity reports + perpetual-assurance evidence-freshness logs
  • Jurisdiction-aware supervisory artifacts (Annex IV / SR 11-7 / DORA / FEAT)
+
+
+ diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js b/rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js index b2627989..a37d8de9 100644 --- a/rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js @@ -12691,11 +12691,12 @@ app.get('/api/governance-index', (_, res) => res.json({ { id: 'P9', name: '2026-2030 Strategic Synthesis & Formal Assurance (G-SIFI)', - description: 'Unified 2026-2030 AGI/ASI technical governance, safety, containment and civilizational-security blueprint for G-SIFIs: the comprehensive master synthesis (regulatory mapping, reference architectures, AGI/ASI safety, the 15 ICGC mechanisms, financial-services MRM, roadmap and /<abstract>/<content> report sections) plus the formal-assurance layer (BBOM, Unified Meta-Invariant Framework with TLA+/Coq/Q#, AGI Containment Labs with CAS-SPP + Bayesian Belief Networks, ARRE + zk-SNARK zero-knowledge compliance, Kafka WORM / Kubernetes / OPA audit architecture).', + description: 'Unified 2026-2030 AGI/ASI technical governance, safety, containment and civilizational-security blueprint for G-SIFIs: the comprehensive master synthesis (regulatory mapping, reference architectures, AGI/ASI safety, the 15 ICGC mechanisms, financial-services MRM, roadmap and <title>/<abstract>/<content> report sections); the formal-assurance layer (BBOM, Unified Meta-Invariant Framework with TLA+/Coq/Q#, AGI Containment Labs with CAS-SPP + Bayesian Belief Networks, ARRE + zk-SNARK zero-knowledge compliance, Kafka WORM / Kubernetes / OPA audit architecture); and the Sentinel AI v2.4 & G-Stack civilizational-assurance architecture (OPA guardrails, GIEN telemetry, Sovereign API Gateway, hardware kill switch, zero-trust Kubernetes/Kafka/OPA backbone, PQC WORM telemetry; the 10-layer G-Stack — GAIRDS, GRI, CEE, NSNs, CESE, GROP, GHP, GSRM, GEA, Meta-Endgame; formal verification via TLA+/Coq/Rego/zk-SNARK CAS-SPP; failure-surface compendia, stress-test & simulation frameworks, lifecycle-integrity & perpetual-assurance protocols; and jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance for a multipolar world).', modules: [ { name: 'Civilizational AGI/ASI Master Synthesis 2026-2030', api: '/api/civ-agi-master-synthesis-2030', dashboard: '/civ-agi-master-synthesis-2030.html', docRef: 'CIV-AGI-MASTER-SYNTHESIS-2030-WP-062', endpoints: 60 }, { name: 'WRE + Sentinel Implementation & G-SIB Executive Evaluation', api: '/api/wre-sentinel-impl-gsib-eval', dashboard: '/wre-sentinel-impl-gsib-eval.html', docRef: 'WRE-SENTINEL-IMPL-GSIB-EVAL-WP-063', endpoints: 26 }, - { name: 'G-SIFI AGI/ASI Formal Governance (BBOM/UMIF/CAS-SPP+BBN/ARRE+zk-SNARK)', api: '/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030', dashboard: '/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.html', docRef: 'GSIFI-AGI-FORMAL-GOV-2030-WP-064', endpoints: 25 } + { name: 'G-SIFI AGI/ASI Formal Governance (BBOM/UMIF/CAS-SPP+BBN/ARRE+zk-SNARK)', api: '/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030', dashboard: '/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.html', docRef: 'GSIFI-AGI-FORMAL-GOV-2030-WP-064', endpoints: 25 }, + { name: 'Sentinel v2.4 & G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance (GAIRDS/GRI/CEE/NSNs/CESE/GROP/GHP/GSRM/GEA/Meta-Endgame)', api: '/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030', dashboard: '/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html', docRef: 'SENTINEL-GSTACK-GSIFI-2030-WP-065', endpoints: 24 } ], keyEndpoints: [ '/api/civ-agi-master-synthesis-2030/regimes', @@ -12706,9 +12707,15 @@ app.get('/api/governance-index', (_, res) => res.json({ '/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/containment-stages', '/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/bbn-nodes', '/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/reg-compliance-proofs', - '/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/report-sections' + '/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/report-sections', + '/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/sentinel-components', + '/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/gstack-layers', + '/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/verification-artifacts', + '/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/failure-surfaces', + '/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/jurisdictions', + '/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/report-sections' ], - formalAssurance: ['BBOM (Behavioral Bill of Materials)', 'UMIF — TLA+ / Coq / Q# meta-invariants', 'CAS-SPP staged containment promotion', 'Bayesian Belief Network systemic-risk gating', 'ARRE Annex-IV reporting', 'zk-SNARK zero-knowledge compliance proofs', 'Kafka WORM / Kubernetes / OPA audit architecture'], + formalAssurance: ['BBOM (Behavioral Bill of Materials)', 'UMIF — TLA+ / Coq / Q# meta-invariants', 'CAS-SPP staged containment promotion', 'Bayesian Belief Network systemic-risk gating', 'ARRE Annex-IV reporting', 'zk-SNARK zero-knowledge compliance proofs', 'Kafka WORM / Kubernetes / OPA audit architecture', 'Sentinel v2.4 OPA/GIEN/Sovereign-Gateway/kill-switch stack', 'G-Stack 10-layer perpetual civilizational assurance (GAIRDS/GRI/CEE/NSNs/CESE/GROP/GHP/GSRM/GEA/Meta-Endgame)', 'TLA+/Coq/Rego + zk-SNARK CAS-SPP formal verification', 'Failure-surface compendia, stress-test & simulation frameworks', 'Lifecycle-integrity & perpetual-assurance protocols', 'Jurisdiction-aware anticipatory compliance (multipolar)'], regulatoryRefs: ['EU AI Act 2024/1689 (incl. Annex IV)', 'NIST AI RMF 1.0', 'NIST AI 600-1', 'ISO/IEC 42001', 'OECD AI Principles', 'GDPR Art. 22', 'FCRA/ECOA', 'Basel III/IV', 'SR 11-7', 'NIS2', 'FCA SMCR/Consumer Duty', 'MAS/HKMA FEAT'], horizon: '2026-2030' } @@ -12734,14 +12741,15 @@ app.get('/api/governance-index', (_, res) => res.json({ { ref: 'GAF-GSIFI-WP-017', title: 'AGI/ASI Governance Architectures & Frameworks', path: '/docs/reports/AGI_ASI_GOVERNANCE_ARCHITECTURES_FRAMEWORKS.md' }, { ref: 'CIV-AGI-MASTER-SYNTHESIS-2030-WP-062', title: 'Civilizational AGI/ASI Master Synthesis 2026-2030', path: '/civ-agi-master-synthesis-2030.html' }, { ref: 'WRE-SENTINEL-IMPL-GSIB-EVAL-WP-063', title: 'WRE + Sentinel Implementation & G-SIB Executive Evaluation', path: '/wre-sentinel-impl-gsib-eval.html' }, - { ref: 'GSIFI-AGI-FORMAL-GOV-2030-WP-064', title: 'G-SIFI AGI/ASI Formal Governance (BBOM/UMIF/CAS-SPP+BBN/ARRE+zk-SNARK) 2026-2030', path: '/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.html' } + { ref: 'GSIFI-AGI-FORMAL-GOV-2030-WP-064', title: 'G-SIFI AGI/ASI Formal Governance (BBOM/UMIF/CAS-SPP+BBN/ARRE+zk-SNARK) 2026-2030', path: '/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.html' }, + { ref: 'SENTINEL-GSTACK-GSIFI-2030-WP-065', title: 'Sentinel AI v2.4 & G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance Architecture for AGI/ASI Governance in G-SIFIs 2026-2030', path: '/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html' } ], dashboards: { - count: 39, + count: 40, governance: ['/governance-index.html', '/practitioner-master-reference.html', '/agi-governance-master-blueprint.html', '/kafka-acl-governance.html', '/governance-architectures-frameworks.html', '/gsifi-governance.html', '/gsifi-practitioner-guide.html', '/six-layer-governance.html'], strategy: ['/enterprise-ai-strategy-g2k.html', '/master-reference.html', '/unified-master-reference.html', '/ai-strategy-report.html'], safety: ['/agi-governance.html', '/asi-preparedness.html', '/agi-governance-unified.html'], - strategicSynthesis2030: ['/civ-agi-master-synthesis-2030.html', '/wre-sentinel-impl-gsib-eval.html', '/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.html'], + strategicSynthesis2030: ['/civ-agi-master-synthesis-2030.html', '/wre-sentinel-impl-gsib-eval.html', '/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.html', '/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html'], platform: ['/index.html', '/eaip-specification.html', '/ciso-roadmap.html', '/ciso-report.html'], indexUrl: '/' }, @@ -12753,10 +12761,10 @@ app.get('/api/governance-index', (_, res) => res.json({ templates: { count: 4, formats: ['Terraform JSON', 'GitHub Actions YAML', 'Python CLI', 'Drift Config JSON'], path: '/artifacts/templates/' } }, platformStats: { - totalEndpoints: 700, - totalDataObjects: 25, - totalReports: 22, - totalDashboards: 37, + totalEndpoints: 724, + totalDataObjects: 26, + totalReports: 23, + totalDashboards: 38, totalArtifacts: 32, totalOpaRules: 280, totalSentinelRules: 952, @@ -25437,6 +25445,109 @@ app.get('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/evidence-pack', (req, res) => res.json(G // ===================== END WP-064 ===================== +// ===================== WP-065: Sentinel AI v2.4 & G-Stack Civilizational-Assurance — OPA/GIEN/Sovereign-Gateway, TLA+/Coq + zk-SNARK CAS-SPP, G-Stack 10-layer (GAIRDS/GRI/CEE/NSNs/CESE/GROP/GHP/GSRM/GEA/Meta-Endgame), failure-surfaces, perpetual assurance, jurisdiction-aware compliance (2026-2030) ===================== +const SGS65 = require('./data/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.json'); + +// Page route +app.get('/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030', (req, res) => { + res.sendFile(path.join(__dirname, 'public', 'sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030.html')); +}); + +// Summary + meta endpoints +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/summary', (req, res) => res.json({ + docRef: SGS65.docRef, + version: SGS65.version, + title: SGS65.title, + horizon: SGS65.horizon, + apiPrefix: SGS65.apiPrefix, + buildsOn: SGS65.buildsOn, + status: SGS65.status, + classification: SGS65.classification, + counts: SGS65.counts, +})); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/directive', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.directive)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/audiences', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.audiences)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/indices', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.indices)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/tiers', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.tiers)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/severities', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.severities)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/investment', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.investment)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/counts', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.counts)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/executive-summary', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.executiveSummary)); + +// Modules +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/modules', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.modules)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/modules/:id', (req, res) => { + const m = SGS65.modules.find(x => x.mid === req.params.id); + if (!m) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'module not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(m); +}); + +// Sentinel v2.4 components (M1) +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/sentinel-components', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.sentinelComponents)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/sentinel-components/:id', (req, res) => { + const c = SGS65.sentinelComponents.find(x => x.scid === req.params.id); + if (!c) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'sentinel component not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(c); +}); + +// G-Stack layers (M4) — GAIRDS/GRI/CEE/NSNs/CESE/GROP/GHP/GSRM/GEA/Meta-Endgame +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/gstack-layers', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.gstackLayers)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/gstack-layers/:id', (req, res) => { + const g = SGS65.gstackLayers.find(x => x.glid === req.params.id); + if (!g) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'gstack layer not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(g); +}); + +// Formal verification artifacts (M3) — TLA+/Coq/Rego/zk-SNARK +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/verification-artifacts', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.verificationArtifacts)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/verification-artifacts/:id', (req, res) => { + const v = SGS65.verificationArtifacts.find(x => x.vaid === req.params.id); + if (!v) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'verification artifact not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(v); +}); + +// Failure-surface compendium (M5) +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/failure-surfaces', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.failureSurfaces)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/failure-surfaces/:id', (req, res) => { + const f = SGS65.failureSurfaces.find(x => x.fsid === req.params.id); + if (!f) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'failure surface not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(f); +}); + +// Jurisdiction-aware compliance (M7) +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/jurisdictions', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.jurisdictions)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/jurisdictions/:id', (req, res) => { + const j = SGS65.jurisdictions.find(x => x.jrid === req.params.id); + if (!j) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'jurisdiction not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(j); +}); + +// Report sections (M8) — <title>/<abstract>/<content> +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/report-sections', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.reportSections)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/report-sections/:id', (req, res) => { + const rs = SGS65.reportSections.find(x => x.rsid === req.params.id); + if (!rs) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'report section not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(rs); +}); + +// Standard artifact endpoints +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/schemas', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.schemas)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/code', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.code)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/kpis', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.kpis)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/risk-control-matrix', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.riskControlMatrix)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/traceability', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.traceability)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/data-flows', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.dataFlows)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/regulators', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.regulators)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/regulators/:name', (req, res) => { + const r = SGS65.regulators.find(x => x.name.toLowerCase() === decodeURIComponent(req.params.name).toLowerCase()); + if (!r) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'regulator not found', name: req.params.name }); + res.json(r); +}); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/rollout-90', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.rollout90)); +app.get('/api/sentinel-gstack-gsifi-2030/evidence-pack', (req, res) => res.json(SGS65.evidencePack)); + +// ===================== END WP-065 ===================== + // SECTION 10: START SERVER // ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════