Summary
Across QuantEcon publications we use a mix of Creative Commons licenses for prose/lecture content. This issue is for the team to compare CC-BY-4.0 and CC-BY-SA-4.0 and converge on a default for new long-form publications (starting with the DP book series being prepared for web publication, see #301).
Current default for new DP books (as a placeholder): CC-BY-SA-4.0, matching the Python lectures.
Comparison
| Dimension |
CC-BY-4.0 |
CC-BY-SA-4.0 |
| Attribution required |
✅ |
✅ |
| Commercial reuse |
✅ |
✅ |
| Modifications/derivatives |
✅ |
✅ |
| Derivatives must be released under the same license |
❌ |
✅ ("share-alike") |
| Used by Python lectures (current) |
— |
✅ |
Used by numpy, scipy docs |
✅ (CC-BY-style for docs) |
— |
| Compatible with most permissive textbook reuse |
✅ |
⚠️ (SA-clause restricts incorporation into proprietary or differently-licensed works) |
| AI training friendliness |
✅ both — both permit indexing/training with attribution. SA imposes downstream-licensing constraints on derivative outputs if they are themselves redistributed. |
|
Considerations
For CC-BY:
- Maximises downstream reuse — anyone can incorporate excerpts into other works (textbooks, courses, blog posts, even commercial training material) without re-licensing.
- Preferred by some open-textbook initiatives (OpenStax, MIT OCW Press) for exactly this reason.
- Cleaner story for AI training datasets — no viral clause to reason about.
For CC-BY-SA:
- Ensures the commons stays open — derivative works that redistribute substantial portions must remain CC-BY-SA.
- Consistent with our Python lectures (already SA-licensed).
- Wikipedia uses CC-BY-SA; familiar pattern.
Proposal for discussion
- Confirm whether we want a single default across QuantEcon long-form content, or allow per-project choice.
- If single default: CC-BY-4.0 (most permissive) or CC-BY-SA-4.0 (status quo for Python lectures)?
- Document the chosen default in a QuantEcon contributor/style guide.
Context
cc @jstac
Summary
Across QuantEcon publications we use a mix of Creative Commons licenses for prose/lecture content. This issue is for the team to compare CC-BY-4.0 and CC-BY-SA-4.0 and converge on a default for new long-form publications (starting with the DP book series being prepared for web publication, see #301).
Current default for new DP books (as a placeholder): CC-BY-SA-4.0, matching the Python lectures.
Comparison
numpy,scipydocsConsiderations
For CC-BY:
For CC-BY-SA:
Proposal for discussion
Context
cc @jstac