VisPeerReview/sec_algorithm.tex at main · USFDataVisualization/VisPeerReview · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60


\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption*{\textbf{Appendix A}: Algorithmic Design }
\label{t1}
\resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{%
\begin{tabular}{|l|ccccc|}
\hline
%\textbf{Algorithmic Design} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{} &  \\ \hline
	\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}\uline{Selection of Algorithm} -   Of the \\ available algorithm options was the best \\ selected?  What aspects of this algorithm \\  make it better or worse than the \\  other possible choices?\end{tabular}
	& \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}c@{}}Below\\ Average\end{tabular}}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ Average}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}c@{}}Above\\ Average\end{tabular} \\
    \cline{2-6}
 	& Comments: &  &  &  &  \\ \hline

\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}} \uline{Correct Implementation} - Does the \\ algorithm appear to produce the correct \\ result, given your knowledge of the data?\end{tabular}
	& \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ No}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}c@{}}Minor\\ Errors\end{tabular}}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}c@{}}Appears\\ Correct\end{tabular} \\
    \cline{2-6}
 	& Comments: &  &  &  &  \\ \hline

	\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}} \uline{Efficient Implementation} - Is the \\ performance (speed) of the algorithm what \\ you expected? Is is slower? Is it faster?\end{tabular}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Much \\ Slower\end{tabular}}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}As \\ Expected\end{tabular}}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Much \\ Faster\end{tabular} \\
    \cline{2-6}
 	& Comments: &  &  &  &  \\ \hline

	\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}} \uline{Featureful Implementation} - Does the \\ implementation contain the basic \\  required features or are additional features \\ included?\end{tabular}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Major \\ Features \\ Missing\end{tabular}}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}As \\ Expected\end{tabular}}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Major \\ Features \\ Added\end{tabular} \\
    \cline{2-6}
 	& Comments: &  &  &  &  \\ \hline

	\begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}} \uline{Datasets Used} - Do the datasets provided \\ give enough information to evaluate the \\ correctness, efficiency, and featurefulness \\ of the implementation?\end{tabular}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Not \\ Useful\end{tabular}}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}As \\ Expected\end{tabular}}
    & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\Square}
    & \Square \ \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Better \\ Than \\ Expected\end{tabular} \\
    \cline{2-6}
 	& Comments: &  &  &  &  \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
}
\end{table}