Skill Review ($25 Bounty)
Skill
skills/compliance/hipaa-review/SKILL.md
What needs improvement
hipaa-review is intentionally scoped to the HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR Part 164, Subpart C), but the workflow only flags Privacy Rule / non-Security-Rule citations near the end of the skill. That makes it easy for an assessment request about 2024 reproductive health care Privacy Rule attestations, 42 CFR Part 2 / SUD records, or general PHI disclosure permissions to be evaluated as if a Security Rule review fully addressed it.
Why this matters
HHS/OCR has recent Privacy/Part 2 obligations that often appear in HIPAA readiness requests but are not Security Rule safeguards:
- OCR's reproductive health care Privacy Rule final rule requires signed attestations for certain PHI requests potentially related to reproductive health care.
- HHS's Part 2 materials say the 2024 Part 2 final rule became effective April 16, 2024, with compliance required February 16, 2026, and applies to SUD records and certain lawful holders.
A Security Rule-only skill should route these topics out of scope early, preserve the Security Rule assessment, and report the unresolved Privacy Rule / Part 2 follow-up rather than silently treating them as covered.
Suggested fix
Add early scope-routing checks to Step 1 and the output template:
- identify whether the request includes Security Rule ePHI safeguard review, Privacy Rule use/disclosure questions, Breach Notification readiness, or Part 2/SUD records;
- flag reproductive health care attestation requests and Part 2/SUD confidentiality requests as out-of-scope referrals for this skill;
- continue with Security Rule review only for ePHI safeguard controls;
- add a report field/table for out-of-scope Privacy Rule / Part 2 follow-ups and the relevant reviewer handoff.
References
Skill Review ($25 Bounty)
Skill
skills/compliance/hipaa-review/SKILL.mdWhat needs improvement
hipaa-reviewis intentionally scoped to the HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR Part 164, Subpart C), but the workflow only flags Privacy Rule / non-Security-Rule citations near the end of the skill. That makes it easy for an assessment request about 2024 reproductive health care Privacy Rule attestations, 42 CFR Part 2 / SUD records, or general PHI disclosure permissions to be evaluated as if a Security Rule review fully addressed it.Why this matters
HHS/OCR has recent Privacy/Part 2 obligations that often appear in HIPAA readiness requests but are not Security Rule safeguards:
A Security Rule-only skill should route these topics out of scope early, preserve the Security Rule assessment, and report the unresolved Privacy Rule / Part 2 follow-up rather than silently treating them as covered.
Suggested fix
Add early scope-routing checks to Step 1 and the output template:
References