Better publisher validation email PublisherService.cs#329
Conversation
Potential alternative to Issue 58 #58
🚀 Deploy this PR to an environmentYou can deploy this PR to either development or staging environment:
Alternatively, you can:
|
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
|
It has never been a problem, just one of those things where it could have become a problem from a malicious user. I think your change is practical, at least gives a user more of an option. I think it might be a good idea to have a loose restriction per userid/pubid and have a runtime list/dictionary of ids for last time requested, number of times requested and publisher id since we'd have a quick way to confirm activity of the command. (Something similar to the welcome channel protection basically) But that can be added later if we ever have a problem with these emails. |
|
/deploy_dev |
|
🚀 Starting deployment of |
Potential alternative to Issue 58
#58
We have a lot of existing @publishers with no database to associate them with the packageID they published.
Instead of relying on a database of publisher/package IDs, we offer an improved publisher validation email that explains how a real publisher can fight back against spam (if it's happening).