Skip to content

FIS Package Update#4

Open
pa-ulex wants to merge 31 commits into
VATGER-Nav:mainfrom
pa-ulex:update-2506
Open

FIS Package Update#4
pa-ulex wants to merge 31 commits into
VATGER-Nav:mainfrom
pa-ulex:update-2506

Conversation

@pa-ulex

@pa-ulex pa-ulex commented May 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This general update to the FIS package brings it up to date with the latest plugin versions, adds a mapbuilder setup and new TopSky maps.

The coordinates were taken from the German, Dutch, Danish, Swedish, Polish, Czech, Austrian, Swiss and French AIPs or NAV-Packages of VATGER.
The sector data was taken from ATCISS/VATGlasses.

@pa-ulex pa-ulex changed the title WIP: Package Update Testing: Package Update Jun 1, 2025
@sergej-singer

sergej-singer commented Jun 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

So, I'm going to be apparently the first one, who is going to leave anything here.

On itself, looks better than before. Still, I assume it's WIP, because here and there, there are things to improve.

  • Colors: I see that, not all the colors were adjusted. I would suggest matching menus either with EDMM or EDGG profiles (i.e. it's currently mixed, you have old default grey chat, beige TopSky menu like in EDGG and gray background like in EDMM).
  • TopSky GUI is too small.
  • FIS border resolution is inconsistent with state borders from Topo Map.
  • Some maps are unnecessarily divided into multiple ones (moreover, placed into different folders), like Helipads and Labels for Helipads, as well as Topo maps.
  • Not sure why there are two folders for airspace.
  • TMZ/RMZ should be on by default.
  • Some maps don't work at all: navaids, urban area maps.

There's probably something more to add, but at a quick glance, that's all I could find. Surely there must be some testing concluded before release.

@sergej-singer sergej-singer marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2025 16:46
@pa-ulex

pa-ulex commented Jun 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

FIS border resolution is inconsistent with state borders from Topo Map.

Should have fixed everything except for the FIS border. I will probably fix this within the next fixes as they are currently only copied from the already existing package.

@hannesaltmann

hannesaltmann commented Jun 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • I would love to see all those areas mentioned in ENR 5.5 implemented
  • Display of glider areas would be nice
  • irl the ED-Rs are grey
  • I guess it's a good idea to have the coastline displayed by default. From what I saw this is always displayed irl (at least EBG North)
  • The airspace labels are different irl (only numbers, see screenshot below). In general, I think these labels can be a bit smaller compared to the current state.
  • The urban areas can hardly be seen. Maybe slightly increase the contrast to the background.
  • Labels for some major cities could be useful for a general orientation
  • Maybe consider implementing some lines to indicate different neighbouring sector (e.g. for distinction between Gdansk and Poznan Information)
  • For Berlin I would prefer an airspace C variant which is visible at all times. Maybe only the HX sectors could be activated depending on the runway?
  • Personally, I would not link the ECLs to any automatic activation. Manual activation is fine, as ECLs hardly have any relevance for FIS.

Screenshot_20250607-173150

@pa-ulex

pa-ulex commented Jun 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author
  • Maybe consider implementing some lines to indicate different neighbouring sector (e.g. for distinction between Gdansk and Poznan Information)

Already asked our neighbouring FIRs for sectors and frequencies, currently waiting for response.

Everything else mentioned above should be fixed with the next update but I'm planning to fix incorrect Maps/Settings first and then implementing new features.

Also thanks for the picture!

@pa-ulex

pa-ulex commented Jun 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The second update also includes a number of fixes. My to-do list now includes integrating ENR 5.5–7 onwards, and including the FIS sectors and borders as soon as I receive a message about them.

I also rewrote a few commits to make the schema better.

pa-ulex and others added 6 commits July 6, 2025 21:06
Fixed AUP URL and added shortcuts
Added mapbuilder workflow
Initally started TopSky Maps
Updated Airspace, Runways and ECLs
Added Germany Border and VRPs initally
Updated Areas, SSRcodes, VRP, Airspaces, FIRs, Settings and Sectors
@pa-ulex pa-ulex marked this pull request as draft July 24, 2025 23:07
@pa-ulex pa-ulex force-pushed the update-2506 branch 2 times, most recently from dc3e28e to da89f8a Compare July 24, 2025 23:45
pa-ulex and others added 11 commits July 25, 2025 01:48
Updated Airspaces, Runways and ECLs
Updated Airspace Labels and Structure
New Airspace Folder Structure and
added EDMM RMZ Runways
Completed VRPs and
began adding External FIS Sectors (WIP)
Removed External FIS Sectors from maps (WIP for future)
Added Neighbour/Bordering FIRs
Corrected AUP Settings
Removed Sound within Profiles
Fixed colors to match EDGG colors
Made GUI Bigger
Default activate TMZ/RMZ
Removed unnessesary map folders
Added Urban Areas
Fix EDDM D CTR
Fix FIS Layer
Added TopSky View
(Non Relevant) Added further neighbour FIS freq.
actions-user and others added 7 commits July 25, 2025 01:48
Changed TopSky Location
Added LF** aerodromes and Navaids
Added Navaid Tags
Added Platzsektor Jägerhaus
Added Urban/City Labels
Added Obstacles
Added PJE Dropping Zones
Changed Urban Colors
Added Berlin Geneal Airspace
Fixed altitude labels
Added TopSky Radars
Added better Border
Added more Airspace QNHs
Added Basel Airspace
Corrected FIS Sectors DS and DM
Moved topo folders
Fixed wrong shortcut
Fixed some PJE spots
Fixed TopSkySSRcodes (DW -> SW)
Removed unnecessary lines
Added Glider Airfields
Reworked General Folder Structure
Added/Corrected VCCS
Added FIR Border
Added/Finished ENR 5.5 Maps
Added MIL RAFIS Sectors
Added Offshore Heli Routes
Added more City Labels
Added various External Airspaces
Started adding Airspace Labels
Corrected Layers
Changed German Border
Changed QGIS Layers
Changed some PRF Settings
Changed Shortcuts
Updated Obstacles
Fixed various Lists
Moved Squwark Plugin
Removed Glider Airfields
Removed CCAMS
Deactivated CPDLC by Default
Updated ECLs
pa-ulex and others added 3 commits August 4, 2025 20:53
Adjusted Squawks
Updated TopSky Areas
Reworked Aerodromes
Reworked Navaids Text Positions
Fix ALT Shortcuts
Added TMZ Labels
Corrected Special Airspace locations (within TopSky Maps)
Removed Neighbour Sectors for now
Add vLARA URL
Add External Airspaces (ELLX, ESMS, EKRN, LFSB, LOWS)
Add missing Aerobatic Sectors
Add TMZ Labels
Add D(CTR) Labels
Fix Navaid Labels
Updated MVA
Adjusted Labels
Adjusted GH Actions name
Adjusted FIS FIR Sector file name
Reworked Layers
Removed FAP from mapbuilder toml
Fix Autobahn Topo
@pa-ulex pa-ulex marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2025 16:31
@pa-ulex pa-ulex changed the title Testing: Package Update FIS Package Update Sep 18, 2025
@pa-ulex pa-ulex force-pushed the update-2506 branch 3 times, most recently from f93dc5d to 436b44a Compare October 3, 2025 23:18
pa-ulex and others added 2 commits October 4, 2025 14:08
Relocate Topsky Folder
Fix Squawk Plugin JSON
Adjuste Map Sorting
Update Obstacles
Update MVA
Small City Label Change
Change to Winter MVA
Remove ECLs
Update Workflow
pa-ulex and others added 2 commits October 22, 2025 02:43
Add new Mode S SSR Region
Rename SquawkIndicator Plugin
Fix numbering
Initially added D(CTR) dynamic activation
Correct Tags
Clarified Helipad usage
Fix typos
Remove OSN VOR
@hannesaltmann

hannesaltmann commented Oct 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Drei Punkte die mir noch aufgefallen sind:

  • Es ist weiterhin schwierig zu erkennen, wo die FIRs oder Sektoren unserer Nachbarn anfangen. Zumindest so ein kleiner Strich, der die FIR-Grenze darstellt, wäre super. Ich muss ja schon wissen, ob ich mit EKDK oder ESMM telefonieren muss.
  • An der Grenze zu unseren Nachbarn sind einige RNAV-Wegpunkte als Bedarfsmeldepunkte angegeben. Diese würde ich zumindest in einer Map unterbringen
  • Vielleicht habe ich es auch übersehen, aber ich konnte keine Map finden, wo ich mir die Locations und ICAO Codes alles ADs schnell einblenden kann

Sonst wirklich super Pack!

@hannesaltmann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Und die ED-Rs und TRAs sollten so aktiviert werden, wie es auch in den normalen packs ist. Also bspw. TRAs und ED-Ds etc. nur per vLARA Aktivierung und die normalen ED-Rs und LANTA per AUP.

@hannesaltmann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Typo City Labels: Dresen --> Dresden

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants