Intra-function information

[emesare]

Right now a Function contains information to build a function signature (name, calling convention, type), this would classify as inter-function analysis, i.e. the transition from one Function to another Function would constitute knowing that information, whereas intra-function analysis would be the information internal to a Function.

Examples of intra-function information:

• Variables
• Comments
• Stack pointer adjustments

[emesare]

I should note comments attached to the function are technically possible through the function type, but that is hardly acceptable. I think functions themselves should have a separate comment metadata, or at least some way other than adding a comment at offset 0, even if the integration does not distinguish between the two.

To clarify "functions themselves" means attached to the function header, rather than showing up within the function body.

[WhatTheFuzz]

Looks like a great feature. Regarding your note on:

I think functions themselves should have a separate comment metadata, or at least some way other than adding a comment at offset 0...

I totally agree. I frequently add comments at offset 0 to describe what the function is doing. Since WARP is geared toward function signatures anyway, I think this is a great way to initially limit scope.

[emesare]

Closed with #30 comments and variables are supported in the WARP spec now.