You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Backwards replace does not respect the nonblocking nature of assignments. E.g., mem_0 may be used even though the flip flop still contains its old value.
Remove unused variables pass can accidentally optimize away memory stores, as it perceives those assignments as never being used. The current workaround is to have an un-removeable memory node type. However it's hard to say if this should be associated with the node (rename to load/store?) or associated with the variable (e.g. new pointer type), or even both.
Solution ideas
Make a new nonblocking assignment type that doesn't actually define variables but only declares variables.
Current problems
mem_0may be used even though the flip flop still contains its old value.Solution ideas