Skip to content

Establish quarterly review cadence and process #2

Description

@amberb617

The charter references quarterly reviews but does not define the process.

Proposed process

  1. Review window -- two-week period each quarter for community feedback
  2. Board review meeting -- board evaluates all feedback and proposed changes
  3. Release -- updated framework version published with changelog
  4. Retrospective -- board reviews the process itself for improvement

Open questions

  • Should quarterly reviews be public or board-only?
  • How do we handle breaking changes to the framework?
  • What is the minimum notice period before a new version is released?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions