Skip to content

How to lower the RESIDUAL and fix the problem with α selection #326

Description

@Ztao0210

dear developer,

During my calculation of anharmonic force constants using ALAMODE combined with AIMD, I encountered an issue of excessively high RESIDUAL values. I attempted to extend the AIMD simulation steps: the number of sampling snapshots was increased from the original 80 to 160, with a sampling interval of 50 fs and random displacement amplitude set to 0.04 Å. This adjustment reduced the RESIDUAL from 62.2275% to 40.5289%. I further expanded the cutoff radius to 30 Bohr and included fifth-order anharmonic force constants in the fitting.

However,` the cutoff radius of 30 Bohr now exceeds the lattice length of the supercell (24.216819646 Bohr). I am unsure whether this setup is physically valid.

In` addition, during the CV cross-validation stage, repeated calculations consistently yielded the minimum CVSCORE at alpha = 1.58489e-05. In theory, this alpha value should produce the minimal subsequent RESIDUAL, yet the actual result contradicts this expectation. After obtaining the optimal alpha of 1.58489e-05 via CV cross-validation, I manually modified the corresponding parameter in the opt.in file to 1.58489e-06; the resulting RESIDUAL dropped to 24.071%. This inconsistency confuses me greatly.

Could` you advise on the subsequent workflow to obtain physically reliable anharmonic force constants?

I am also attaching input files and output files below.

1opt.log

2opt.log

3opt.log
Best regards,
Tao

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions