You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2026. It is now read-only.
Problem:
The regtech-data-validator currently validates SBL (Small Business Lending) data for format compliance and data quality, but doesn't include validation rules for AML/BSA suspicious activity patterns that lenders must monitor under the Bank Secrecy Act.
FinCEN requires financial institutions to detect and report suspicious activity in small business lending, but there's no standardized validation framework for identifying these patterns in SBL data submissions.
Solution:
Add AML/BSA validation rules to the SBL schema that flag suspicious patterns:
Structuring Patterns:
Multiple loans to same beneficial owner just below CTR threshold ($10K)
Rapid sequential loan applications from related entities
Loan amounts that aggregate to suspicious thresholds
High-Risk Indicators:
Loans to shell companies (no employees, minimal operations)
Cash-intensive businesses (MSBs, check cashers, car washes)
Problem:
The regtech-data-validator currently validates SBL (Small Business Lending) data for format compliance and data quality, but doesn't include validation rules for AML/BSA suspicious activity patterns that lenders must monitor under the Bank Secrecy Act.
FinCEN requires financial institutions to detect and report suspicious activity in small business lending, but there's no standardized validation framework for identifying these patterns in SBL data submissions.
Solution:
Add AML/BSA validation rules to the SBL schema that flag suspicious patterns:
Structuring Patterns:
High-Risk Indicators:
Behavioral Red Flags:
Regulatory Drivers:
Implementation Approach:
Use Cases:
I can help with: