Skip to content

[Incubation] Podman Container Tools Incubation Application #2150

@actionmancan

Description

@actionmancan

Podman - CNCF Incubation Application

Application for Incubation: Sandbox Application #309

This document tracks Podman's progress toward CNCF Incubation and provides evidence for each requirement.


Application Process Principles

Requirement Status Evidence
Engage with domain specific TAG TAG-Runtime Meeting Notes - Completed TAG walkthrough presentation
TAG provides insight/recommendation in context of landscape TAG-Runtime Meeting Notes - TAG provided feedback during review
All project metadata and resources are vendor neutral Project hosted under github.com/containers organization with multi-vendor governance
Review and ack expectations for Sandbox Sandbox acceptance
Due Diligence Review Pending TOC assignment
Additional docs as appropriate In progress

Governance

Requirement Status Evidence
Clear and discoverable governance documentation GOVERNANCE.md
Document complete list of current maintainers MAINTAINERS file with names, contact info, and affiliations
Appropriate number of active maintainers Contributors Graph - 798+ contributors, multi-company maintainer team
Code and Doc ownership matches governance roles CODEOWNERS aligned with MAINTAINERS
Document adoption of CNCF Code of Conduct CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md references CNCF CoC
CNCF Code of Conduct cross-linked from governance docs Cross-linked in CONTRIBUTING.md and README
All subprojects listed Subprojects documented: Podman Desktop, Buildah, Skopeo, crun

Contributors

Requirement Status Evidence
Clearly defined process to submit issues or changes CONTRIBUTING.md, Submitting Issues & PRs
At least one public communications channel Matrix (#podman:matrix.org), Discord, IRC (#podman on libera.chat), GitHub Discussions
List all project communication channels Community page - Matrix, Discord, IRC, GitHub Discussions, Mailing List
Up-to-date public meeting schedules Podman Community Meetings - Regular Community Meeting & Cabal with recordings and minutes
Documentation of how to contribute CONTRIBUTING.md, PR Submission Details
Demonstrate contributor activity and recruitment Contribution Stats, DevStats, contributors from Red Hat, SUSE, Amadeus, Motorola Solutions, NTT, IBM, Debian

Engineering Principles

Requirement Status Evidence
Document project goals and differentiation README - Why Podman? - Daemonless, rootless containers differentiating from Docker
Document what the project does and why Podman.io Documentation, Getting Started Guide
Public roadmap or forward-looking planning GitHub Projects Board, Release Planning
Overview of project architecture Architecture Documentation, Cloud Native Use Cases
Document the release process Release Process, Release Notes

Security

Requirement Status Evidence
Clearly defined process to report security issues SECURITY.md
Enforcing Access Control Rules Branch protection rules - 2FA required, signed commits, review requirements
Document security response roles Security Policy documents security team and response process
Security Self-Assessment Podman Security Self-Assessment
OpenSSF Best Practices passing badge OpenSSF Best Practices Badge - 100% compliance

Ecosystem

Requirement Status Evidence
Publicly documented list of adopters ADOPTERS.md
Used by at least 3 independent adopters Notable adopters include: Red Hat (OpenShift/RHEL), SUSE, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, multiple enterprise users
TOC verification of adopters Pending TOC review
Documented integrations with CNCF projects Kubernetes CRI-O integration, Prometheus metrics, OCI/containerd compatibility

Additional Evidence

Community Health Metrics

  • GitHub Stars: 29,900+
  • Forks: 2,900+
  • Contributors: 798+
  • Commits: 26,377+
  • Releases: 233
  • Used By: 170+ organizations including UiPath, OpenShift, DataDog

Production Usage

  • Default container runtime in RHEL 8+, Fedora, CentOS Stream
  • Integrated in GitHub Actions and GitLab CI runners
  • Used by major cloud providers for serverless container workloads

Vendor Diversity

Contributors from multiple organizations including:

  • Red Hat
  • SUSE
  • Amadeus
  • Motorola Solutions
  • NTT
  • IBM
  • Debian

References


Last Updated: December 2025

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    dd/needs-triageDD application has not been reviewedkind/ddProject DD or item related to the DD processlevel/incubationItem related to an incubation level project or the incubation criteria/process itselfneeds-triageIndicates an issue or PR that has not been triaged yet (has a 'triage/foo' label applied)toctoc specific issue

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status

    New

    Status

    No status

    Status

    No status

    Status

    No status

    Status

    No status

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions