Skip to content

Support for multiple team members/main branch vs feature branch tracking #141

@codinronan

Description

@codinronan

I'd open this as a discussion but since this project only has issues --

I'm extremely interested in using this for our team and I think - at the individual developer level, working via Cursor or Claude code - it solves a huge number of problems for us. We've spent months debating the best way to document and * keep up to date * the documentation for our code base (as distinct from things like design docs, testing and style requirements, etc -- stuff that we'd insert in Claude.md or as skills).

However before I go that path I want to explore how multiple teammates can use this at once. Let's say for example I host the MCP server on a VM and make it available to the engineers in our org, and I point it to main. How would this work for engineers who need to work on features? Could for example the engineers can have a local version that points to their current feature branch and simply use their favorite LLM to tie code analysis between the two together? Could/would that local version be capable of simply being a diff with the hosted version?

I may not be explaining this the best - hopefully you get my point. Essentially it's how to keep this data up to date and useful for feature development for multiple feature branches at once.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions