Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
This is a redux of #85 after conversation with @jpower432.
When automating tasks with complypack, I am unable to use the CLI tool to achieve all operations that an LLM is able to perform via the MCP server.
I expected the CLI to have all of the core capabilities of the MCP server for cases where CLI-based automation is desired and/or I want the system to always execute deterministically.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to ensure that all operations using complypack can be done via a full-featured CLI as well as the MCP server. I would also like for the two systems to remain in parity at all times where it makes sense.
I would recommend nailing this into AGENTS.md for evaluation during development.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I considered wrapping the MCP server with a CLI. This is fragile and requires the MCP server to embody capabilities that may not be useful to an LLM (output format specification, etc...).
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When automating tasks with
complypack, I am unable to use the CLI tool to achieve all operations that an LLM is able to perform via the MCP server.I expected the CLI to have all of the core capabilities of the MCP server for cases where CLI-based automation is desired and/or I want the system to always execute deterministically.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to ensure that all operations using
complypackcan be done via a full-featured CLI as well as the MCP server. I would also like for the two systems to remain in parity at all times where it makes sense.I would recommend nailing this into AGENTS.md for evaluation during development.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I considered wrapping the MCP server with a CLI. This is fragile and requires the MCP server to embody capabilities that may not be useful to an LLM (output format specification, etc...).