See: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#section-4
Questions:
- Should we note that these individual instances of
dcam:VocabularyEncodingScheme are historical/"archaic" and that users may want to replace these IRIs with some respective formal IRIs (e.g. when there are skos:ConceptScheme equivalencies of them)?
- Do we want to split them (the entire section) out from the main dcmi-terms document?
- Should we note that
dcam:VocabularyEncodingScheme is also "archaic" and suggest to use skos:ConceptScheme instead?
See: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#section-4
Questions:
dcam:VocabularyEncodingSchemeare historical/"archaic" and that users may want to replace these IRIs with some respective formal IRIs (e.g. when there areskos:ConceptSchemeequivalencies of them)?dcam:VocabularyEncodingSchemeis also "archaic" and suggest to useskos:ConceptSchemeinstead?