Replies: 2 comments
-
|
hey @crazy-max, sorry for tagging you directly but u seem to be the most active maintained of the repo and i simply want to make sure this discussion doesn't go unnoticed ^^ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Closing in favor of #228 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We experienced quite some issue when github updated their runners to ship with docker version
29.1.5(previously was 27/28), so we decided to ensure we have control over which docker version is installed in our workflows. Thus we found this action and at the start everthing was looking great... for AMD64 runners at least.Once we tried building multi-arch images for one of our projects, we observed very strange errors:
Image with name "..." not found(example) even though the image was just pulled a few seconds earlierWe tried a bunch of workarounds that were discussed here but none seemed to fix our issue - all attempts are also visible here.
Our last idea was to install docker differently... via
aptinstead of usingdocker/setup-docker-action. And to our supprise that solved all our issues (this run).That made us curious: is this action supposed to be working on githubs official arm based runners? (e.g.
ubuntu-24.04-arm) and if not, do you plan to add support for arm runners in the near future?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions