Hi!
The graphql-java project, as this project, uses the Apache-2.0 license.
However, as you know, graphql-java used some code from this repository... and that code contained, and still contains, EPL-license copyrights at the top.
We've found out because we're using more comprehensive license checks and it came up that graphql-java is actually double-licensed, as it currently stands, due to those files.
Would you consider it ok if graphql-java removed the copyrights reference to EPL in order to make it clear that the whole project is Apache-2.0 licensed?
Please comment on graphql-java/java-dataloader#139 if possible.
Thanks in advance.
Hi!
The graphql-java project, as this project, uses the Apache-2.0 license.
However, as you know, graphql-java used some code from this repository... and that code contained, and still contains, EPL-license copyrights at the top.
We've found out because we're using more comprehensive license checks and it came up that graphql-java is actually double-licensed, as it currently stands, due to those files.
Would you consider it ok if graphql-java removed the copyrights reference to EPL in order to make it clear that the whole project is Apache-2.0 licensed?
Please comment on graphql-java/java-dataloader#139 if possible.
Thanks in advance.