Feedback and Thanks! #8
Description
I have successfully used Tumbletest on every occasion that I got and it has never failed me so far. Even though at first sight, everything seems to be magic, the architecture is robust, quite flexible and accessible for most use cases.
I know that at least at this point the framework is intended to be as light-weight as possible but, to further reduce the number of lines of code for future test generators I would suggest you make an analysis of the past generators and see what are the most common test-stringify functions (I noticed that everyone is using this pattern), or at least to add more "building blocks" functions in generator_utils (something like "PrintVector(..)", "PrintMatrix()", etc.).
Also, It would be nice to be able to configure the test generation from a JSON file.
Overall it's a great framework and I am looking forward to new features and more generator_utilities.
Thank you!