Skip to content

Test for coverage #47

@RemDelaporteMathurin

Description

@RemDelaporteMathurin

I noticed the coverage was fairly low. We need to increase it (target >90%) which means we need to check for it, I vote for an integration with codecov

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions