Currently, to view the route tree, the following steps are required:
./foliage-cli gwalk to types - navigate to the desired node (types)../foliage-cli gwalk routes -v 2 - get the route tree, or ./foliage-cli gwalk inspect -p to get details about the current location.
It is possible to use a combined command like: ./foliage-cli gwalk to types && ./foliage-cli gwalk routes -v 2
However, when working frequently with the CLI, this approach feels cumbersome and inconvenient.
Desired Behavior:
Introduce a more concise syntax:
• ./foliage-cli gwalk to types routes -v 2 - navigate to the node and view the route tree.
• ./foliage-cli gwalk to hub/afs78db08593bsdny7sdfb7asdf inspect -p - navigate to the node and view details.
This improvement would make the CLI more user-friendly and efficient.
Currently, to view the route tree, the following steps are required:
./foliage-cli gwalk to types- navigate to the desired node (types)../foliage-cli gwalk routes -v 2- get the route tree, or./foliage-cli gwalk inspect -pto get details about the current location.It is possible to use a combined command like:
./foliage-cli gwalk to types && ./foliage-cli gwalk routes -v 2However, when working frequently with the CLI, this approach feels cumbersome and inconvenient.
Desired Behavior:
Introduce a more concise syntax:
•
./foliage-cli gwalk to types routes -v 2- navigate to the node and view the route tree.•
./foliage-cli gwalk to hub/afs78db08593bsdny7sdfb7asdf inspect -p- navigate to the node and view details.This improvement would make the CLI more user-friendly and efficient.