I've really appreciated your work, wonderful analysis of the CHSH violation for two qubits in a simulator and on a real QC.
I'm often wondering about the fact physical reality seems to have computed a finite amount of classical information, i.e. entropy from the Big Bang, in our observable light cone.
Bell inequality seems to suggest a possible probe for such an apparent paradox about the computational power of an equivalent computing machine.
Are you going to extend your analysis to a GHZ experiment for N entangled qubits?
Would you expect the inequality to be violated by an arbitrary large number of entangled qubits in a real QC?
Have been the GHZ inequality probed so far for what you know on a real QC? To what extent? The maximum number of gates, the maximum complexity of the circuit as Susskind would define it, seems a serious bound to my eyes for the state of art available QC.
Apologies for my naive question, thanks for your attention, Orfheo.
I've really appreciated your work, wonderful analysis of the CHSH violation for two qubits in a simulator and on a real QC.
I'm often wondering about the fact physical reality seems to have computed a finite amount of classical information, i.e. entropy from the Big Bang, in our observable light cone.
Bell inequality seems to suggest a possible probe for such an apparent paradox about the computational power of an equivalent computing machine.
Are you going to extend your analysis to a GHZ experiment for N entangled qubits?
Would you expect the inequality to be violated by an arbitrary large number of entangled qubits in a real QC?
Have been the GHZ inequality probed so far for what you know on a real QC? To what extent? The maximum number of gates, the maximum complexity of the circuit as Susskind would define it, seems a serious bound to my eyes for the state of art available QC.
Apologies for my naive question, thanks for your attention, Orfheo.