vim9script, functions calls without :call

[dezza]

Describe the bug
Using a function as intended in vim9script, without :call will result in E492: Not an editor command:

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

vim9script
def Foo():
  echom "done"
enddef
foo() # E92: Not an editor command: foo

Expected behavior
Resolving vim9 functions.

[chemzqm]

@iamcco please consider adding support for vim9.

[iamcco]

@iamcco please consider adding support for vim9.

It need vim-vimlparser to support vim9.

[igbanam]

How do I setup the support for vim9 with vim-vimlparser?

Screen.Recording.2022-10-20.at.09.42.17.mov

[igbanam]

For context, I'm using vim-language-server through yegappan/lsp

[iamcco]

How do I setup the support for vim9 with vim-vimlparser?

What I mean is vim-language-server depend on vim-vimlparser to support vim9 and by now vim-vimlparser does not support vim9.

[jclsn]

@iamcco There seems to be a PR now. The vimlparser maintainers haven't looked at it still. Maybe want to give the patched vimlparser.js a try?

vim-jp/vim-vimlparser#205

[sideshowbarker]

@iamcco There seems to be a PR now. The vimlparser maintainers haven't looked at it still. Maybe want to give the patched vimlparser.js a try?

vim-jp/vim-vimlparser#205

The changes from that PR have now been merged into the vim-vimlparser sources: vim-jp/vim-vimlparser@075a4fa.