Background
docs/launch-kit.md tracks a large set of directory/listing submissions, accepted listings, blocked targets, duplicate PRs, and repos that require manual forms or human-only contribution. README currently surfaces only a small accepted-listing set.
Evidence
docs/launch-kit.md contains many listing PRs and follow-up states across AI coding, CLI, observability, cost, and TUI directories.
- README currently states the project is listed in Awesome Gemini CLI, Charm in the Wild, and Awesome Claude Code and Skills.
- The launch kit also records blocked or sensitive targets such as repos requiring forms, human-only submissions, maturity requirements, or no automated resubmission.
- Product is not allowed to post externally or create external PRs; this needs Growth/human follow-up rather than Product action.
User value
Users should see credible, current public proof points without stale, duplicated, or low-quality directory claims.
Adoption rationale
A tidy directory status improves discoverability and keeps public social proof accurate while avoiding repeated low-quality submissions.
Suggested scope
- Review
docs/launch-kit.md directory/listing section and classify entries as accepted, pending, blocked, duplicate/closed, or do-not-resubmit.
- Compare accepted listings against README/site claims.
- Update public-facing accepted-listing copy only when there is verifiable upstream evidence.
- Keep blocked/manual-only targets documented internally for Growth routing, not public promotion.
Non-goals
- Do not submit new external PRs or issues from this task.
- Do not resubmit to targets that rejected automated or duplicate submissions.
- Do not add internal targets, platform metric goals, or artificial popularity language.
Acceptance criteria
- Launch kit directory status is easy for Growth to scan by state.
- README/site accepted-listing claims match verified accepted upstream listings.
- Blocked/manual-only external targets remain clearly marked so agents do not retry them automatically.
Suggested lane
lane/growth
Risk
Medium. Incorrect public listing claims can reduce trust, and repeated low-quality external submissions can harm reputation.
Source
Product blackboard and launch-kit review on 2026-05-10.
Background
docs/launch-kit.mdtracks a large set of directory/listing submissions, accepted listings, blocked targets, duplicate PRs, and repos that require manual forms or human-only contribution. README currently surfaces only a small accepted-listing set.Evidence
docs/launch-kit.mdcontains many listing PRs and follow-up states across AI coding, CLI, observability, cost, and TUI directories.User value
Users should see credible, current public proof points without stale, duplicated, or low-quality directory claims.
Adoption rationale
A tidy directory status improves discoverability and keeps public social proof accurate while avoiding repeated low-quality submissions.
Suggested scope
docs/launch-kit.mddirectory/listing section and classify entries as accepted, pending, blocked, duplicate/closed, or do-not-resubmit.Non-goals
Acceptance criteria
Suggested lane
lane/growth
Risk
Medium. Incorrect public listing claims can reduce trust, and repeated low-quality external submissions can harm reputation.
Source
Product blackboard and launch-kit review on 2026-05-10.