Skip to content

Audit directory listing status before updating public proof points #175

@luoyuctl

Description

@luoyuctl

Background

docs/launch-kit.md tracks a large set of directory/listing submissions, accepted listings, blocked targets, duplicate PRs, and repos that require manual forms or human-only contribution. README currently surfaces only a small accepted-listing set.

Evidence

  • docs/launch-kit.md contains many listing PRs and follow-up states across AI coding, CLI, observability, cost, and TUI directories.
  • README currently states the project is listed in Awesome Gemini CLI, Charm in the Wild, and Awesome Claude Code and Skills.
  • The launch kit also records blocked or sensitive targets such as repos requiring forms, human-only submissions, maturity requirements, or no automated resubmission.
  • Product is not allowed to post externally or create external PRs; this needs Growth/human follow-up rather than Product action.

User value

Users should see credible, current public proof points without stale, duplicated, or low-quality directory claims.

Adoption rationale

A tidy directory status improves discoverability and keeps public social proof accurate while avoiding repeated low-quality submissions.

Suggested scope

  • Review docs/launch-kit.md directory/listing section and classify entries as accepted, pending, blocked, duplicate/closed, or do-not-resubmit.
  • Compare accepted listings against README/site claims.
  • Update public-facing accepted-listing copy only when there is verifiable upstream evidence.
  • Keep blocked/manual-only targets documented internally for Growth routing, not public promotion.

Non-goals

  • Do not submit new external PRs or issues from this task.
  • Do not resubmit to targets that rejected automated or duplicate submissions.
  • Do not add internal targets, platform metric goals, or artificial popularity language.

Acceptance criteria

  • Launch kit directory status is easy for Growth to scan by state.
  • README/site accepted-listing claims match verified accepted upstream listings.
  • Blocked/manual-only external targets remain clearly marked so agents do not retry them automatically.

Suggested lane

lane/growth

Risk

Medium. Incorrect public listing claims can reduce trust, and repeated low-quality external submissions can harm reputation.

Source

Product blackboard and launch-kit review on 2026-05-10.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    lane/growthAdoption and distribution workpriority/P2Useful follow-up worksource/productCreated or updated by product manager routingstatus/ready-for-agentReady for an agent to implement

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions