You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a developer onboarding to harness engineering with sk, I want a clear philosophy document that explains why harness engineering matters, what it does, how it works, and its limitations, so that I can make informed decisions about when and how to use it in my projects.
Acceptance Criteria
docs/HARNESS-PHILOSOPHY.md created with full content
Document covers: Why (the +36% performance gap), What (components), How (sk architecture), When (decision matrix), Architecture, Limitations, Best Practices, Further Reading
Includes concrete examples and references to SWE-bench, AgentBench, CORE benchmark papers
Mentions limitations: non-determinism, cost, latency, multi-agent races, scope of SK_HARNESS
Cross-referenced from docs/HARNESS.md (update cross-reference)
Linked from HARNESS-PHILOSOPHY.md to docs/HARNESS.md for API details
User Story
As a developer onboarding to harness engineering with sk, I want a clear philosophy document that explains why harness engineering matters, what it does, how it works, and its limitations, so that I can make informed decisions about when and how to use it in my projects.
Acceptance Criteria
docs/HARNESS-PHILOSOPHY.mdcreated with full contentdocs/HARNESS.md(update cross-reference)docs/HARNESS.mdfor API detailsPriority: HIGH
Labels: documentation, harness, priority:high
Files: docs/HARNESS-PHILOSOPHY.md, docs/HARNESS.md