Skip to content

with respect to #9

@marqh

Description

@marqh

There is a core capability requirement, that one or more statements defining a statistical process are defined with respect to another aspect of the data set.

The common use case is that a statistical process is defined with respect to a coordinate.

This issue forces us to investigate multiplicity, I believe. Specifically:

  1. Will a data set contain more than one statistical process definition?
    1. if so, will these be an ordered list?
  2. Will a statistical process definition reference more than one coordinate?

An implementation which assumes which assumes that 1 & 2 will always be 'no' is a simpler implementation, but may be a significant limitation to our progress.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions