Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I also tried to achieve something similar and came to the same conclusion, we should have workflow_call on most of the workflows. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Idea Description
I'd like to create an orchestrator workflow for our releases.
Draft thinking:
CreateRelease.yaml(creates pre-release)PublishToAppSource.yaml(GoLive: false)IncrementVersionNumber.yamlto increase minor versionBut to be able to invoke other AL-Go workflows, they would need to have
workflow_calladded.My other options:
gh workflow runand poll for resultsWhat's the downsides of adding
workflow_callto the workflows?One I can think about is when we need to add new required parameters, that could break callers. But that would break all my other options as well...
workflow_callgot added toUpdateGitHubGoSystemFilesin #2031 (with an additional fix in #2154), but I would like to add this to more workflows.I'm open to do the work myself, and in that case, I'd focus the three ones above.
Contribution (Optional)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions