As an engineer I would like to get a complete and consistent assessment of my applications, combined with a realistic cost estimation and Azure SKU guidance.
As shown below, while the JavaScript app could technically not being assessed completely the guidance is rehosting to AKS, and the Java app should be moved to Azure App Service. Both apps are insurance backend services. My expectation would have been bringing both either to AKS or ACA - from an architecture design perspective the guidance shown here it does not make much sense and I have no information available why these SKUs have been chosen.
On the application assessment tab is also not the target SKU of the node app displayed, but on the cost estimate tab.
Test repository used: https://github.com/jkordick/agentcon-25-swe-agents
As an engineer I would like to get a complete and consistent assessment of my applications, combined with a realistic cost estimation and Azure SKU guidance.
As shown below, while the JavaScript app could technically not being assessed completely the guidance is rehosting to AKS, and the Java app should be moved to Azure App Service. Both apps are insurance backend services. My expectation would have been bringing both either to AKS or ACA - from an architecture design perspective the guidance shown here it does not make much sense and I have no information available why these SKUs have been chosen.
On the application assessment tab is also not the target SKU of the node app displayed, but on the cost estimate tab.
Test repository used: https://github.com/jkordick/agentcon-25-swe-agents
