Changed SHA256 for 2.8.4

[danielfdickinson]

A user has noticed a change in the SHA256 for the official 2.8.4 tarball: openwrt/packages#29390 (comment) .

Is this intentional, and if so, could we know the cause?

[jimklimov]

Thanks for the heads-up, commented there and here:

Regarding the hash for NUT v2.8.4 (released in August) - as explained later on the mailing list, there was some mismatch between tarballs and signatures published before leaving for vacations, which was only rectified in September. The sets published in github release page and on nut-website now should be the correct ones.

Some CI systems could have cached the initial posting (quite their right to do so), sorry about the ensuing head-ache.

There is an ongoing effort about recipes and scripts "properly" handling multi-digit version components, but for now integers are considered a scarce resource, so there was no re-release with a new number to settle it better.