update to draft-dejong-remotestorage-03

[michielbdejong]

Hi!

Great to see you wrote a remoteStorage server in python! We want as many different implementations as possible to exist, this is important for the process of getting the spec more stable on its way from Internet-Draft to (hopefully) RFC.

Can we help you update this server to the newest spec? Here's an example of how it works in nodejs: https://github.com/remotestorage/remotestorage-server/blob/master/lib/requests.js#L322-L369

[relet]

Hey! I am currently rather offline due to being on parental leave. If you find someone who is interested in working on it, I'm happy to add contributions and contributors - otherwise I'm not certain when I'll take a look at it.

[raucao]

@relet Wanna take a look at this again sometime? Can I help with updating this server? The new spec is being released in a couple days, so we could try to bring it to -05 directly, making it valid for the next 1.5 years.

[untitaker]

I'd like to take this project over and get it up to date with -05. @relet What's your stance on introducing dependencies for this server? I'd like to start depending on Flask (or at least Werkzeug).

[relet]

Great to hear. I'm totally open to sensible dependencies.

What I would suggest to keep things democratic is that you just fork the project, and I'm happy to defer to whichever implementation is most active or popular, or link to several.

[untitaker]

I'm not sure if it makes sense to scatter around more forks, since this is rather confusing to users. If you agree with the changes, I'd like to merge that fork back sometime.

[relet]

Ok, that'll work. I'm also totally happy to give contributors access when
there is development.

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:11 Markus Unterwaditzer notifications@github.com
wrote:

I'm not sure if it makes sense to scatter around more forks. If you agree
with the changes, I'd like to merge that fork back sometime.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1 (comment)
.