Templates are in the tree but are not provided in the flake

[Lord-Valen]

It is currently impossible to init with the templates in this repository.

[vic]

I know, it's been a long road, but we are almost there, we still have to have something valuable to be shared on templates :), I cannot control other people repositories, so I've started an opinionated dendritic modules collection, from there, hopefully people will start looking to organize their modules and add community-driven collections in dendrix.

[websheriff]

I'm looking to possibly contribute once I understand the ecosystem a little more. Is this repo supposed to be just for dendrix based modules and denful is based on modules added with den? Or what's the difference between the two repos?

[vic]

This repo existed long before Den was even a thing. So dendrix is about community Dendritic repositories, see #23.

Initially when dendrix started we only had flake-parts based Dendritic, so the tooling in this repo is implemented around flake-parts. However as state in my "Why Den?" page, I found that most modules using flake.modules.* were not actually made for re-usability.

That page also documents why I made dendrix, to have an index of what aspects were people creating, and have a common "language", eg, create community discussions about organization of features that could be re-used.

So dendrix was born a lot earlier than Den, Den tries to solve the re-usability part and better organization that is complicated to do with flake-parts based repos. See the mentioned page at Den docs.

denful is for Den powered batteries, so it is specific to people using Den, like a lazyvim distribution where people enable Den aspects that affect NixOS/homeManager at a once.

dendrix is an index of repos made by people using the Dendritic pattern, not necesarily Den, not necesarily flake-parts (since we do have Dendritic with pure lib.evalModules).

I just have my current time priorities in finishing Den (I feel we are very close to v1.0) and then will focus on denful.