This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 7, 2019. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 7, 2019. It is now read-only.
Isn't it the DNS result? Are there something wrong in my post processing? #2
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. I tried to do the simulation with channel flow procedure(phisical
size:4×pi,2,2*pi grid size:128*129*84) .In the end, I can get the
ux001-ux030,uy001-uy030,uz001-uz030,pp001-pp030,vort001-vort030 etc binary data
file.
2. Then I use the pathline.f90(in the attach files),to translate the binary
data to ascii data,in order that I can watch the data with Tecplot
3. But the results show that It isn't my ideal expectation output. The result
isn't perfect! I don't know whether there are something wrong in my post
processing?
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
My expected output : more clear flow field structure information is shown than the LES/DES.
What I saw is the coarse output without enough flow field message.
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Incompact3d under UbuntuKylin13.10
Please provide any additional information below.
vort30.jpg is the file generated at the the 30th time step.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by zhaoturk...@gmail.com on 18 Apr 2014 at 5:09
Attachments:
