name of package respresents only half of the possibilities

[hpvd]

Since the package do a lot more than caching (it reduce filesize of final pdf)
it is a bit of a pity that the name represents only half of the possibilities

To attracted even more users and make it better/easier to find, maybe one should think about rethinking the name (your package is is still young / seems to be relatively new on dante :-)

[xqms]

Well, it started out as a way to make compilation of larger documents a lot faster, that's why it's named graphicscache. The DPI scaling options came a lot later.

What do you think would be a better name?

(All in all I think the name is not that critical... A lot of the popular LaTeX packages have really strange names :D)

[hpvd]

sure there are packages with strange names ;D

just to look at it from another perspective:
If you really decide to make it possible to use external tools to optimize the images further in a hq way (like discussed in #15)

maybe it can make sense to split the functions to 2 packages:

• one doing the caching part keeping the name "graphicscache" and
• a second package depending on "graphicscache" but extending it with the image optimizing function, which could be named something with "optimization" or "size" in it...