Add reproducible RFC review dashboard workflow

[SoundBlaster]

Motivation

RFC edits need a reproducible way to keep the interactive review dashboard and its 60 review cards synchronized with the source draft.

Goals

• Make RFC review generation reproducible from tracked repository inputs.
• Reject stale dashboard output and review-card links to missing RFC headings.
• Run the same check in pull-request CI.

Changes

• Add tracked review card data, dashboard template, stylesheet, Python generator, and JavaScript syntax check.
• Add make review-build and make review-check commands and document the update cycle.
• Extend the documentation workflow with Python and Node setup plus the dashboard check.

Validation

• /opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.10/libexec/bin/python3 -m json.tool review/review-data.json >/dev/null
• make review-check PYTHON=/opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.10/libexec/bin/python3
• git diff --check

Boundaries and Non-Goals

• Stacked on Add interactive Agent Surface RFC review #3 (codex/interactive-rfc-review); merge that PR first.
• Does not change the RFC text or the rendered dashboard behavior.
• Does not infer whether every RFC section needs a review card; it validates declared card-to-heading links.

Notes

• Install local build dependency with python3 -m pip install -r review/requirements.txt.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 134b18257b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".