chore(multipart): fmt code

[0x676e67]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Optimized multipart request construction for more efficient and reliable assembly of parts.
  • Improved handling of text, binary, file uploads and streamed content, including filename, MIME type and custom headers application.
  • Internal simplification with no changes to public APIs or exported behavior.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7edd167b-09b8-485d-90fb-efd9d2f5745b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d02967 and 5767f5a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/client/body/multipart.rs

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• src/client/body/multipart.rs

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Refactors multipart part-construction in src/client/body/multipart.rs by replacing a two-step build (with build_inner and clone_value_or_take) with a single Part::build_part method that clones or takes the value and constructs the multipart::Part inline.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Multipart part construction src/client/body/multipart.rs	Replaced Part::build_form_part/helpers with a unified Part::build_part(py) that clones-or-takes the part value, builds the multipart::Part inside py.detach (handling Text/Bytes/File/Stream paths), applies optional filename, MIME parsing (mapping failures to Error::Library), and custom headers; removed build_inner and clone_value_or_take helpers.

Estimated Code Review Effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly Related PRs

• feat(multipart): allow reusing types other than stream iterators #571: Modifies the same src/client/body/multipart.rs part-construction logic, directly related to the merged build/clone behavior changes.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through code with nimble art,
One build now binds each part by heart.
Cloned or taken, wrapped with care,
Headers, names, and mime all there.
A joyful thump — a tidy start! 🥕✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'chore(multipart): fmt code' is vague and generic. It suggests only code formatting, but the actual changes include significant refactoring: consolidating part-building logic, removing helper methods, and restructuring how multipart parts are constructed.	Revise the title to reflect the main structural change, such as 'refactor(multipart): consolidate part building logic' or 'chore(multipart): simplify part construction into build_part method'.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch multipart

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}