Skip to content

Example showing the compatibility layer between AFL++ and LibAFL QEMU usermode#1983

Closed
andreafioraldi wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
aflpp_qemu
Closed

Example showing the compatibility layer between AFL++ and LibAFL QEMU usermode#1983
andreafioraldi wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
aflpp_qemu

Conversation

@andreafioraldi

@andreafioraldi andreafioraldi commented Mar 30, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TODO

  • TB caching in the parent
  • Add support for qemuafl env vars

@tokatoka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

you should FIX the layer

@andreafioraldi andreafioraldi changed the title Add a compatibility layer between AFL++ and LibAFL QEMU usermode Example showing the compatibility layer between AFL++ and LibAFL QEMU usermode Mar 30, 2024
@domenukk

domenukk commented May 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Status?

@andreafioraldi

andreafioraldi commented May 8, 2024 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@Paniv45

Paniv45 commented Mar 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey @domenukk, @andreafioraldi , @tokatoka

I’m Paniv Kapoor, and I came across the GSoC project proposal to replace qemuafl with LibAFL_QEMU. It looks really interesting, and I’d love to contribute while learning more about the AFL++ forkserver protocol, TCG caching, and snapshot usage in LibAFL_QEMU.

Is there any qualification task for this project? Also, if you have any recommended resources for learning Rust (assuming LibAFL_QEMU is in Rust) and understanding the internals of AFL++/QEMU, that would be super helpful!

Looking forward to your response. Thanks!

Best,
Paniv Kapoor

@domenukk

domenukk commented May 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tokatoka why close this if it's not done/merged?

@tokatoka

tokatoka commented May 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

this won't be merged & #3114 supercedes it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants