Skip to content

🧪 test: add missing error test in JWT refresh verify#22

Open
Adityavanjre wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
auth-service-test-error-verify-2936404923186085799
Open

🧪 test: add missing error test in JWT refresh verify#22
Adityavanjre wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
auth-service-test-error-verify-2936404923186085799

Conversation

@Adityavanjre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: The testing gap addressed: Missing unit test for auth.service.ts to cover the scenario where jwtService.verify throws an error.
📊 Coverage: Now tests the error condition when invalid or expired refresh tokens are passed to refreshSession, ensuring UnauthorizedException is properly thrown with the correct message.
Result: Test coverage improved for auth.service.ts and the refreshSession method's exception handling logic is properly verified to catch bugs.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 2936404923186085799 started by @Adityavanjre

Co-authored-by: Adityavanjre <66417028+Adityavanjre@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 8, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Adityavanjre has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 32 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Free

Run ID: acc5df91-74f0-4c04-9bdf-a909ea0e038f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6051811 and 093f358.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • nexus/backend/src/auth/auth.service.spec.ts

Note

🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit Free

Your organization is on the Free plan. CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please upgrade your subscription to CodeRabbit Pro by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/login.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant