React + Vite prototype for an enterprise multi-console AI workspace.
- Frontend stack: React 19, Vite 7, Tailwind CSS, React Router.
- Main modules: Dashboard, Power Console, Admin Console, Policy Center, Meeting Room, Multi-Agent Chat, MCTS Visualizer, Company Simulation.
- Automation: Manual GitHub Actions workflow for lint/build/test-if-present, optional issue prioritization, optional deploy placeholder.
- เทคโนโลยีหลัก: React 19, Vite 7, Tailwind CSS, React Router
- โมดูลหลัก: Dashboard, Power Console, Admin Console, Policy Center, Meeting Room, Multi-Agent Chat, MCTS Visualizer, Company Simulation
- งานอัตโนมัติ: GitHub Actions แบบ manual สำหรับ lint/build/test (ถ้ามี), จัดลำดับ issue และ deploy placeholder
A reliable and production-ready frontend platform with:
- zero broken placeholder interactions,
- no redundant documentation blocks,
- explicit architecture/protocol/reliability work plan,
- measurable quality gates (lint/build/tests/SLO checks/security checks).
สภาพเป้าหมายคือระบบ Frontend ที่พร้อมโปรดักชัน โดยมี:
- การโต้ตอบ UI ที่ไม่ทำให้เกิดพฤติกรรมผิดพลาดจาก placeholder,
- เอกสารไม่ซ้ำซ้อน,
- แผนงาน Architecture/Protocol/Reliability ชัดเจน,
- เกณฑ์วัดผลคุณภาพที่ตรวจสอบได้จริง
| Workstream | Objective | KPI / Acceptance Gate |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Define clean module boundaries and shared UI patterns | No cross-module duplication for shared components; architecture map published |
| Protocol | Standardize UI action contracts and routing behavior | No href="#" placeholders in interactive actions |
| Reliability | Eliminate UX inconsistencies and critical interaction bugs | Lint/build green; no known P1 UI interaction bugs |
| Benchmark | Track bundle and rendering budget | Bundle size baseline recorded; regression threshold defined |
| Ops | Improve CI/CD and operational runbooks | Manual workflow + runbook checklist completed |
| Migration | Prepare path from prototype to production modules | Migration milestones with rollback plan documented |
- Story A1: Replace non-functional anchor placeholders.
- Task A1.1: Convert
href="#"controls to semantic buttons or real routes. - Acceptance criteria:
rg 'href="#" src/pages'returns no result.
- Task A1.1: Convert
- Story A2: Reduce external dependency leakage in auth UI.
- Task A2.1: Remove third-party image URL from sign-in button.
- Acceptance criteria: Auth page has no external image URL for social login icon.
- Story B1: Consolidate duplicated or mixed sections in README.
- Task B1.1: Separate current-state, target-state, and roadmap clearly.
- Acceptance criteria: README has single-source sections (no repeated bullets across EN/TH blocks).
- Story B2: Define future scope without mixing with current operations.
- Task B2.1: Add explicit Future Roadmap table.
- Acceptance criteria: Roadmap appears in dedicated section only.
- Story C1: Keep CI baseline healthy.
- Task C1.1: Ensure lint/build pass after refactor.
- Acceptance criteria:
npm run lintandnpm run buildsucceed.
- What: Fix critical interaction inconsistencies and documentation redundancy first.
- Pros: Fastest risk reduction, low change surface, immediate CI confidence.
- Cons: Does not yet introduce deeper architecture refactor.
- What: Refactor all pages into reusable design tokens/components immediately.
- Pros: Long-term consistency and maintainability.
- Cons: Higher scope/risk and longer delivery timeline.
- What: Expand from frontend prototype to full-stack with policy enforcement.
- Pros: Moves toward enterprise completeness.
- Cons: Too broad for current stability-focused objective.
Chosen reason: Option 1 aligns with reliability-first drivers and keeps delivery safe under constrained scope/time.
| Risk / Failure mode | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Placeholder links trigger wrong navigation behavior | UX inconsistency / accidental page jump | Replace with semantic buttons or actual routes |
| External third-party asset in auth UI | Privacy and availability risk | Use local/icon-based asset instead |
| Documentation drift and duplicated planning text | Team confusion | Maintain single-source README structure |
| CI passes but no tests present | Limited regression protection | Add phased test plan in roadmap and enforce future gates |
| Phase | Owner | Timeline | Rollback |
|---|---|---|---|
| UI interaction fixes | Frontend owner | Day 0 | Revert commit if interaction regression appears |
| README consolidation | Tech lead / maintainer | Day 0 | Restore previous README from git history |
| CI validation | DevOps/Frontend | Day 0 | Block merge if lint/build fail |
| Post-merge monitoring | Maintainer | Day 1-2 | Hotfix branch and patch release |
- Tests & checks: lint/build pass in CI; component/integration tests planned for next phase.
- SLO gates: UI navigation and primary interactions must have zero blocker defects before release.
- Benchmark gates: bundle-size baseline recorded and monitored on each release.
- Observability: client error logging and release tagging enabled before production rollout.
- Runbooks: deployment + rollback runbook available to on-call team.
- Security checks: dependency audit, no unnecessary external asset leakage on auth-critical screens.
| Quarter | Initiative | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 | Component library extraction | Shared UI primitives reduce duplication and speed feature delivery |
| Q3 | Test suite expansion (unit + routing + interaction) | Safer releases with measurable coverage |
| Q3 | Runtime monitoring and error budget dashboard | Faster incident detection and recovery |
| Q4 | Production deployment pipeline hardening | Repeatable staged rollouts with policy checks |