Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [CRITICAL] Fix Broken Access Control in visit endpoint#25

Open
Ap-0007 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/fix-visit-access-control-10187075606943161778
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [CRITICAL] Fix Broken Access Control in visit endpoint#25
Ap-0007 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/fix-visit-access-control-10187075606943161778

Conversation

@Ap-0007

@Ap-0007 Ap-0007 commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🚨 Severity: CRITICAL
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: The POST /api/visit endpoint trusted the visitorUsername provided in the JSON body, leading to a Broken Access Control vulnerability where anyone could spoof a visit from another user.
🎯 Impact: A malicious user could send a request with an arbitrary visitorUsername and falsely manipulate the visit tracking/analytics for any developer.
πŸ”§ Fix: Modified app/api/visit/route.ts to ignore the client-provided visitorUsername and instead rely on server-side session authentication (await auth()) to establish the identity.
βœ… Verification: Run npm run build && npm run lint. Manually verify that the file app/api/visit/route.ts no longer reads visitorUsername from the body.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 10187075606943161778 started by @Ap-0007

This commit addresses a critical Broken Access Control vulnerability
in the `POST /api/visit` endpoint. The endpoint previously trusted the
`visitorUsername` provided in the client's request body, allowing any
user to spoof visits and attribute them to someone else.

The fix removes the reliance on the request body for the visitor's
identity and instead securely retrieves it from the server-side
session via NextAuth (`await auth()`).

This commit also updates the Sentinel journal with the learning.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
side_pro Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 11, 2026 1:30pm

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant