Skip to content

Revert "ci(format): use repository .clang-format in PR formatting workflow (#267)"#278

Merged
plexoos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-fix-style-policy
Apr 7, 2026
Merged

Revert "ci(format): use repository .clang-format in PR formatting workflow (#267)"#278
plexoos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-fix-style-policy

Conversation

@plexoos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@plexoos plexoos commented Apr 7, 2026

This reverts commit 088346f.

It was my mistake to change the default Microsoft style after seeing the large number of unnecessary formatting changes in #262. The CI cpp-linter job is correctly configured to check style only on modified lines.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 7, 2026 18:13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Reverts the prior change that made the PR formatting workflow use the repository’s .clang-format file, returning CI formatting to the built-in Microsoft style and removing the repo-level clang-format configuration.

Changes:

  • Update PR formatting workflow to use style: microsoft instead of style: file.
  • Remove the root .clang-format file that was introduced for CI formatting.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
.github/workflows/build-pull-request.yaml Switch cpp-linter formatting back to the built-in Microsoft style.
.clang-format Deletes the repository clang-format configuration file (reverting earlier CI-format integration).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@plexoos plexoos merged commit cf12386 into main Apr 7, 2026
7 checks passed
@plexoos plexoos deleted the revert-fix-style-policy branch April 7, 2026 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants