Add Sport Cub Monte Carlo failure-envelope study#322
Open
dbansal02 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: dbansal02 <divyanshibansal2020@gmail.com>
dbansal02
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 15, 2026 18:54
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a reproducible Sport Cub Monte Carlo failure-envelope study with controller, receiver, mission-condition, and physical-parameter sweeps; explicit hard-failure classification; raw CSV evidence; professional plots; and a structured HTML report.
Spec / MLS Alignment
Risk and Design Notes
Testing
Code Size Budget
Net growth consists of the standalone simulation model, focused experiment runners, reproducible raw evidence, plots, and report. The first compression pass reused shared trial construction, metrics, failure classification, and model code instead of duplicating those mechanisms. Further studies should extract shared campaign/plot aggregation helpers rather than add another independent framework.
Reviewer Checklist