Skip to content

refactor(remote-config): migrate rcservicemrf component to v2#48548

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2
Apr 7, 2026
Merged

refactor(remote-config): migrate rcservicemrf component to v2#48548
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2

Conversation

@louis-cqrl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl commented Mar 29, 2026

What does this PR do?

Migrates comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf from V1 component structure to V2, following the standard def/impl/fx layout.

  • Moved component.go to def/component.go (interface only)
  • Moved rcservicemrfimpl/rcservicemrf.go to impl/rcservicemrf.go with updated package and imports
  • Created fx/fx.go with Module() helper
  • Deleted old component.go and rcservicemrfimpl/ directory
  • Updated all callers to import from comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/def

Motivation

Standardizes the component structure to V2, separating the interface definition from the implementation and fx wiring.

Describe how you validated your changes

CI

Additional Notes

None.

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Mar 29, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the medium review PR review might take time label Mar 29, 2026
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 29, 2026

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: 0f4a90a
Comparison: 0e2ef2f

binaryosarchchange
agentlinuxamd64
+3, -2
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/rcservicemrfimpl
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/impl
agentlinuxarm64
+3, -2
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/rcservicemrfimpl
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/impl
agentwindowsamd64
+3, -2
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/rcservicemrfimpl
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/impl
agentdarwinamd64
+3, -2
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/rcservicemrfimpl
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/impl
agentdarwinarm64
+3, -2
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/rcservicemrfimpl
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/impl
iot-agentlinuxamd64
+3, -2
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/rcservicemrfimpl
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/impl
iot-agentlinuxarm64
+3, -2
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/rcservicemrfimpl
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/impl
heroku-agentlinuxamd64
+3, -2
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/rcservicemrfimpl
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/remote-config/rcservicemrf/impl

@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl added qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed labels Mar 29, 2026
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 29, 2026

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 0f4a90a2:

Results for datadog-agent_7.79.0~devel.git.484.0e2ef2f.pipeline.106489485-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da bot commented Mar 29, 2026

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: bf715aaa-abb5-4c0a-a182-fd0a82e85de3

Baseline: 1764162
Comparison: 777f105
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +2.14 [-0.85, +5.12] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +2.14 [-0.85, +5.12] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.42 [+0.36, +0.48] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization +0.28 [+0.05, +0.50] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization +0.25 [+0.16, +0.35] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.21 [+0.16, +0.26] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.06 [-0.51, +0.62] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.40, +0.48] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.20, +0.22] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.20, +0.22] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.10, +0.11] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.00 [-0.03, +0.04] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.38, +0.39] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.14, +0.07] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization -0.04 [-0.12, +0.04] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization -0.05 [-0.19, +0.09] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization -0.27 [-0.44, -0.11] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics memory utilization -0.30 [-0.49, -0.10] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.38 [-0.44, -0.33] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization -0.44 [-0.52, -0.37] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization -0.53 [-0.69, -0.37] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -0.64 [-0.87, -0.41] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.80 [-1.00, -0.60] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.10 [-2.76, +0.55] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10 680 ≥ 26
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10 274.11MiB ≤ 370MiB
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10 588 ≥ 26
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.19GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.23GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.19GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.21GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 = 3 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 173.94MiB ≤ 181MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 = 3 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 491.06MiB ≤ 550MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 204.46MiB ≤ 220MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 363.92 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 417.01MiB ≤ 475MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 29, 2026

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 0f4a90a
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_heroku_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 313.466 → 313.470 → 320.580
30 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 753.327 MiB
agent_deb_amd64_fips 710.235 MiB
agent_msi 605.221 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 753.311 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips 710.219 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 731.682 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips 691.650 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 753.311 MiB
agent_suse_amd64_fips 710.219 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 731.682 MiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips 691.650 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 813.599 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 816.772 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1004.514 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 996.466 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 204.111 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 218.547 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.142 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.689 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.270 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.507 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 29.917 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.066 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 29.917 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 29.917 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 43.305 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 40.352 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 41.100 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 43.306 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 43.306 MiB
On-wire sizes (compressed)
Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 -36.59 KiB (0.02% reduction) 174.880 → 174.844 → 178.360
agent_deb_amd64_fips +17.29 KiB (0.01% increase) 165.396 → 165.413 → 172.790
agent_heroku_amd64 +11.76 KiB (0.02% increase) 75.042 → 75.054 → 79.970
agent_msi -28.0 KiB (0.02% reduction) 138.512 → 138.484 → 146.220
agent_rpm_amd64 +15.52 KiB (0.01% increase) 177.663 → 177.678 → 181.830
agent_rpm_amd64_fips -27.87 KiB (0.02% reduction) 167.765 → 167.738 → 173.370
agent_rpm_arm64 -4.03 KiB (0.00% reduction) 159.612 → 159.608 → 163.060
agent_rpm_arm64_fips -20.74 KiB (0.01% reduction) 151.483 → 151.463 → 156.170
agent_suse_amd64 +15.52 KiB (0.01% increase) 177.663 → 177.678 → 181.830
agent_suse_amd64_fips -27.87 KiB (0.02% reduction) 167.765 → 167.738 → 173.370
agent_suse_arm64 -4.03 KiB (0.00% reduction) 159.612 → 159.608 → 163.060
agent_suse_arm64_fips -20.74 KiB (0.01% reduction) 151.483 → 151.463 → 156.170
docker_agent_amd64 +3.51 KiB (0.00% increase) 268.272 → 268.276 → 272.480
docker_agent_arm64 neutral 255.457 MiB → 261.060
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 +3.49 KiB (0.00% increase) 336.922 → 336.926 → 341.100
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 neutral 320.093 MiB → 325.620
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 neutral 71.421 MiB → 72.920
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 neutral 67.046 MiB → 68.220
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 neutral 2.999 MiB → 3.330
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 neutral 2.729 MiB → 3.090
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 neutral 15.180 MiB → 15.820
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 neutral 14.506 MiB → 14.830
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 neutral 7.900 MiB → 8.790
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 neutral 6.785 MiB → 7.710
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 neutral 7.911 MiB → 8.800
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 neutral 7.911 MiB → 8.800
iot_agent_deb_amd64 -3.07 KiB (0.03% reduction) 11.411 → 11.408 → 13.040
iot_agent_deb_arm64 neutral 9.726 MiB → 11.450
iot_agent_deb_armhf neutral 9.946 MiB → 11.620
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 -4.58 KiB (0.04% reduction) 11.428 → 11.423 → 13.060
iot_agent_suse_amd64 -4.58 KiB (0.04% reduction) 11.428 → 11.423 → 13.060

@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl force-pushed the louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2 branch 2 times, most recently from da141ae to 58a0f42 Compare March 30, 2026 09:27
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl marked this pull request as ready for review March 30, 2026 09:45
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl requested review from a team as code owners March 30, 2026 09:45
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl requested a review from jeremy-hanna March 30, 2026 09:45
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl force-pushed the louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2 branch from 58a0f42 to 5f5ccb5 Compare March 30, 2026 10:17
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl marked this pull request as draft March 31, 2026 08:10
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl force-pushed the louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2 branch from 5f5ccb5 to 71a4262 Compare March 31, 2026 08:24
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2026 08:25
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl added the ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR label Apr 1, 2026
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl marked this pull request as draft April 7, 2026 13:05
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl force-pushed the louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2 branch from 2868650 to 004b897 Compare April 7, 2026 13:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added long review PR is complex, plan time to review it and removed medium review PR review might take time labels Apr 7, 2026
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2026 13:26
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 004b897fa0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl force-pushed the louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2 branch from 004b897 to 64db7b0 Compare April 7, 2026 13:33
@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed long review PR is complex, plan time to review it labels Apr 7, 2026
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl force-pushed the louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2 branch from 64db7b0 to 2b1a80f Compare April 7, 2026 14:08
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl marked this pull request as draft April 7, 2026 19:37
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl force-pushed the louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2 branch from 948435c to 2b1a80f Compare April 7, 2026 19:37
@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2026 20:14
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot merged commit 777f105 into main Apr 7, 2026
277 of 278 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot deleted the louis-cqrl/refactor-remote-config-rcservicemrf-to-v2 branch April 7, 2026 22:57
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.79.0 milestone Apr 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed internal Identify a non-fork PR medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-runtimes team/container-experiences team/remote-config

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants