Skip to content

Add a trace_stats_sampled scenario to macrobenchmarks#8446

Open
andrewlock wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
andrew/client-side-stats/add-benchmark
Open

Add a trace_stats_sampled scenario to macrobenchmarks#8446
andrewlock wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
andrew/client-side-stats/add-benchmark

Conversation

@andrewlock
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@andrewlock andrewlock commented Apr 13, 2026

Summary of changes

Adds 10% sampled scenarios to macrobenchmarks

Reason for change

We'd like to understand the impact of sampling on throughput, particularly with regards to client-side-stats

Implementation details

Added 2 new scenarios to each platform

Test coverage

This is the test, hopefully it works 🤞

Other details

Related to this stack (but can and should be merged first and independently)

Part of a stack:

@andrewlock andrewlock requested a review from a team as a code owner April 13, 2026 12:53
@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc label Apr 13, 2026
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot bot commented Apr 13, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8446) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration71.28 ± (71.35 - 71.63) ms71.32 ± (71.45 - 71.80) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration75.44 ± (75.38 - 75.76) ms75.70 ± (75.50 - 75.87) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1067.68 ± (1068.98 - 1076.01) ms1067.59 ± (1068.34 - 1074.29) ms-0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.20 ± (22.17 - 22.24) ms22.18 ± (22.15 - 22.21) ms-0.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms83.60 ± (83.42 - 83.78) ms83.45 ± (83.27 - 83.63) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.91 ± (10.91 - 10.91) MB10.91 ± (10.91 - 10.91) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.22 ± (22.19 - 22.26) ms22.14 ± (22.11 - 22.18) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms85.02 ± (84.83 - 85.22) ms84.62 ± (84.44 - 84.81) ms-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.95 ± (10.95 - 10.95) MB10.93 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms228.61 ± (227.50 - 229.73) ms227.51 ± (226.31 - 228.71) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms523.29 ± (522.13 - 524.45) ms521.31 ± (519.82 - 522.80) ms-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.43 ± (48.39 - 48.46) MB48.45 ± (48.42 - 48.48) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms20.90 ± (20.87 - 20.92) ms20.86 ± (20.82 - 20.89) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.02 ± (71.87 - 72.17) ms71.58 ± (71.43 - 71.73) ms-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.62 ± (10.62 - 10.62) MB10.61 ± (10.61 - 10.62) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.86 ± (20.82 - 20.89) ms20.79 ± (20.76 - 20.82) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.99 ± (72.82 - 73.15) ms72.60 ± (72.44 - 72.75) ms-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.71 ± (10.71 - 10.71) MB10.74 ± (10.74 - 10.74) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms385.47 ± (383.08 - 387.86) ms383.47 ± (381.63 - 385.30) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms517.62 ± (516.76 - 518.47) ms520.91 ± (520.00 - 521.82) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.87 ± (49.84 - 49.90) MB50.07 ± (50.04 - 50.09) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.1%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.21 ± (19.18 - 19.25) ms19.12 ± (19.09 - 19.15) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms71.86 ± (71.71 - 72.01) ms70.81 ± (70.66 - 70.96) ms-1.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB7.69 ± (7.68 - 7.70) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.16 ± (19.12 - 19.20) ms19.23 ± (19.20 - 19.26) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.38 ± (72.22 - 72.55) ms72.64 ± (72.45 - 72.82) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.71 ± (7.70 - 7.71) MB7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms302.51 ± (300.41 - 304.60) ms305.94 ± (303.73 - 308.14) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms477.67 ± (476.84 - 478.49) ms476.86 ± (476.14 - 477.59) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.05 ± (37.03 - 37.08) MB37.08 ± (37.06 - 37.11) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.1%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration208.12 ± (207.76 - 208.67) ms207.47 ± (207.11 - 208.12) ms-0.3%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration211.53 ± (211.34 - 211.98) ms213.03 ± (212.87 - 213.54) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1213.83 ± (1213.72 - 1221.54) ms1213.30 ± (1213.08 - 1219.61) ms-0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms202.71 ± (202.27 - 203.14) ms203.07 ± (202.69 - 203.46) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms88.22 ± (87.97 - 88.47) ms88.57 ± (88.37 - 88.77) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.97 ± (15.95 - 16.00) MB15.96 ± (15.94 - 15.99) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.1%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms201.35 ± (200.92 - 201.77) ms202.89 ± (202.55 - 203.22) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms89.23 ± (89.00 - 89.47) ms89.65 ± (89.45 - 89.84) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.06 ± (16.03 - 16.08) MB16.01 ± (15.99 - 16.04) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms415.82 ± (414.63 - 417.02) ms414.97 ± (413.82 - 416.12) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms544.38 ± (543.26 - 545.51) ms544.20 ± (542.91 - 545.50) ms-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed59.32 ± (59.28 - 59.37) MB59.34 ± (59.29 - 59.38) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.1%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms208.09 ± (207.67 - 208.52) ms208.88 ± (208.51 - 209.26) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.83 ± (76.63 - 77.04) ms77.48 ± (77.19 - 77.76) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.28 ± (16.26 - 16.30) MB16.28 ± (16.26 - 16.31) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)20 ± (19 - 20)+0.9%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms207.18 ± (206.81 - 207.55) ms208.70 ± (208.27 - 209.12) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms77.98 ± (77.81 - 78.14) ms79.08 ± (78.88 - 79.28) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.30 ± (16.27 - 16.32) MB16.30 ± (16.28 - 16.33) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)20 ± (20 - 21)-0.2%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms595.03 ± (592.42 - 597.64) ms598.22 ± (595.67 - 600.77) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms549.58 ± (548.06 - 551.10) ms551.15 ± (549.99 - 552.30) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.25 ± (61.12 - 61.37) MB61.49 ± (61.38 - 61.60) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms205.65 ± (205.32 - 205.98) ms207.08 ± (206.74 - 207.43) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms75.99 ± (75.78 - 76.19) ms76.78 ± (76.59 - 76.98) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.61 ± (11.59 - 11.63) MB11.63 ± (11.60 - 11.65) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.8%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms204.18 ± (203.83 - 204.53) ms205.90 ± (205.61 - 206.19) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.93 ± (76.77 - 77.09) ms77.50 ± (77.32 - 77.67) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.67 ± (11.65 - 11.69) MB11.74 ± (11.72 - 11.76) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms539.32 ± (532.21 - 546.43) ms534.38 ± (527.61 - 541.15) ms-0.9%✅
process.time_to_main_ms505.16 ± (504.26 - 506.07) ms508.06 ± (507.25 - 508.88) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.84 ± (50.76 - 50.93) MB50.92 ± (50.84 - 51.01) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8446) - mean (72ms)  : 69, 74
    master - mean (71ms)  : 69, 73

    section Bailout
    This PR (8446) - mean (76ms)  : 74, 78
    master - mean (76ms)  : 73, 78

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8446) - mean (1,071ms)  : 1028, 1115
    master - mean (1,072ms)  : 1022, 1123
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8446) - mean (112ms)  : 109, 116
    master - mean (113ms)  : 109, 116

    section Bailout
    This PR (8446) - mean (113ms)  : 111, 116
    master - mean (114ms)  : 110, 117

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8446) - mean (787ms)  : 761, 812
    master - mean (789ms)  : 769, 809
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8446) - mean (99ms)  : 96, 101
    master - mean (99ms)  : 95, 103

    section Bailout
    This PR (8446) - mean (99ms)  : 97, 102
    master - mean (100ms)  : 97, 103

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8446) - mean (934ms)  : 902, 965
    master - mean (929ms)  : 896, 963
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8446) - mean (97ms)  : 94, 101
    master - mean (99ms)  : 96, 101

    section Bailout
    This PR (8446) - mean (100ms)  : 95, 104
    master - mean (99ms)  : 96, 102

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8446) - mean (813ms)  : 781, 846
    master - mean (811ms)  : 778, 845
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8446) - mean (208ms)  : 203, 213
    master - mean (208ms)  : 204, 213

    section Bailout
    This PR (8446) - mean (213ms)  : 210, 216
    master - mean (212ms)  : 209, 215

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8446) - mean (1,216ms)  : 1168, 1265
    master - mean (1,218ms)  : 1159, 1276
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8446) - mean (300ms)  : 295, 306
    master - mean (300ms)  : 293, 307

    section Bailout
    This PR (8446) - mean (302ms)  : 297, 306
    master - mean (300ms)  : 295, 305

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8446) - mean (995ms)  : 965, 1025
    master - mean (995ms)  : 970, 1020
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8446) - mean (296ms)  : 289, 302
    master - mean (294ms)  : 287, 300

    section Bailout
    This PR (8446) - mean (297ms)  : 291, 302
    master - mean (294ms)  : 288, 300

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8446) - mean (1,181ms)  : 1145, 1218
    master - mean (1,176ms)  : 1138, 1213
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8446) - mean (294ms)  : 290, 299
    master - mean (292ms)  : 287, 297

    section Bailout
    This PR (8446) - mean (294ms)  : 289, 298
    master - mean (291ms)  : 286, 296

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8446) - mean (1,079ms)  : 973, 1186
    master - mean (1,078ms)  : 974, 1182
Loading

NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria reviewed Apr 13, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml Outdated
NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria reviewed Apr 13, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml Outdated
NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria reviewed Apr 13, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml
andrewlock
andrewlock commented Apr 13, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml Outdated
@andrewlock
Apply suggestions from code review
7c1c62a 
Co-authored-by: Andrew Lock <andrewlock.net@gmail.com>
NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria approved these changes Apr 13, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@pr-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pr-commenter bot commented Apr 13, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-14 18:13:51

Comparing candidate commit 1bb9407 in PR branch andrew/client-side-stats/add-benchmark with baseline commit 6c7f4d5 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 26 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 87 known flaky benchmarks.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-6238.634op/s; -5942.432op/s] or [-7.122%; -6.784%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.863ms; -0.874ms] or [-0.926%; -0.434%]
  • ignore throughput [+645.996op/s; +1039.100op/s] or [+0.766%; +1.232%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1924.602µs; +1588.217µs] or [-0.960%; +0.792%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+10741.797op/s; +12934.721op/s] or [+9.029%; +10.872%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-164.567µs; +2038.372µs] or [-0.083%; +1.025%]
  • ignore throughput [-3354.482op/s; -2177.450op/s] or [-3.411%; -2.214%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-20 bytes; -19 bytes] or [-0.613%; -0.600%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+310.253ms; +312.720ms] or [+153.958%; +155.183%]
  • ignore throughput [+3.565op/s; +7.749op/s] or [+0.641%; +1.394%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+383.367ms; +385.973ms] or [+302.883%; +304.942%]
  • ignore throughput [+2.684op/s; +7.690op/s] or [+0.354%; +1.014%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+397.288ms; +400.949ms] or [+351.585%; +354.825%]
  • ignore throughput [-3.547op/s; -0.263op/s] or [-0.501%; -0.037%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-372.314µs; +197.008µs] or [-0.186%; +0.098%]
  • ignore throughput [+2578.731op/s; +2963.244op/s] or [+2.006%; +2.306%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.005%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.269ms; -12.106ms] or [-7.598%; -5.654%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+8961.161op/s; +11743.417op/s] or [+6.541%; +8.572%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.002%]
  • ignore execution_time [-12.560ms; -8.433ms] or [-5.981%; -4.016%]
  • ignore throughput [+5308.840op/s; +7613.854op/s] or [+4.800%; +6.884%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-972.186µs; -327.139µs] or [-0.484%; -0.163%]
  • ignore throughput [+16870.596op/s; +20435.509op/s] or [+1.723%; +2.087%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.005%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.568ms; -21.695ms] or [-11.848%; -9.675%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+94853.868op/s; +117655.005op/s] or [+10.133%; +12.569%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-3.168ms; +1.147ms] or [-1.582%; +0.573%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+75916.394op/s; +92871.433op/s] or [+10.908%; +13.344%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1011.083µs; +29.938µs] or [-0.504%; +0.015%]
  • ignore throughput [+1235.483op/s; +2048.481op/s] or [+0.831%; +1.379%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.183ms; +3.300ms] or [-0.092%; +1.665%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+8988.407op/s; +11906.874op/s] or [+5.719%; +7.576%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+3.477ms; +7.473ms] or [+1.773%; +3.810%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+7375.563op/s; +10015.837op/s] or [+5.876%; +7.979%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-332.500µs; -130.937µs] or [-0.166%; -0.065%]
  • ignore throughput [+20552.407op/s; +32722.210op/s] or [+0.625%; +0.995%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-2.141ms; -0.896ms] or [-1.059%; -0.443%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+365862.798op/s; +407302.604op/s] or [+12.199%; +13.581%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.702ms; -14.354ms] or [-8.621%; -6.617%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+200421.876op/s; +253893.755op/s] or [+7.955%; +10.078%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.007%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.725ms; +300.566ms] or [+149.762%; +150.183%]
  • ignore throughput [+115.254op/s; +134.690op/s] or [+1.273%; +1.488%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.759ms; +302.106ms] or [+150.665%; +152.353%]
  • ignore throughput [+332.922op/s; +544.896op/s] or [+2.546%; +4.168%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.455ms; +302.001ms] or [+150.842%; +152.125%]
  • ignore throughput [+141.104op/s; +269.516op/s] or [+1.362%; +2.602%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+3 bytes; +4 bytes] or [+0.186%; +0.199%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.139ms; +298.151ms] or [+145.943%; +146.440%]
  • ignore throughput [+10.629op/s; +16.734op/s] or [+0.282%; +0.444%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.424ms; +298.190ms] or [+144.422%; +145.774%]
  • ignore throughput [+101.420op/s; +144.675op/s] or [+1.473%; +2.102%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.026ms; +301.447ms] or [+149.953%; +150.663%]
  • ignore throughput [+17.319op/s; +40.857op/s] or [+0.344%; +0.811%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+4.562µs; +9.006µs] or [+0.937%; +1.849%]
  • ignore throughput [-36.737op/s; -18.558op/s] or [-1.789%; -0.904%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.010%]
  • ignore execution_time [+17.524µs; +44.355µs] or [+4.019%; +10.173%]
  • ignore throughput [-217.951op/s; -97.237op/s] or [-9.476%; -4.227%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+4.629µs; +26.565µs] or [+0.992%; +5.692%]
  • ignore throughput [-133.208op/s; -52.564op/s] or [-6.149%; -2.426%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.855µs; -0.805µs] or [-1.311%; -0.217%]
  • ignore throughput [+6.696op/s; +35.867op/s] or [+0.248%; +1.328%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+22.138µs; +45.720µs] or [+7.067%; +14.596%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-426.166op/s; -227.716op/s] or [-13.285%; -7.099%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-15.956µs; +6.442µs] or [-4.365%; +1.762%]
  • ignore throughput [-81.249op/s; +52.501op/s] or [-2.916%; +1.884%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.928ms; +300.557ms] or [+149.695%; +150.009%]
  • ignore throughput [-1270993.915op/s; -708883.584op/s] or [-0.637%; -0.355%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+58 bytes; +60 bytes] or [+0.324%; +0.335%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+415.296ms; +420.881ms] or [+451.237%; +457.305%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1092.978op/s; +1212.193op/s] or [+8.981%; +9.961%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-3 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.015%; -0.004%]
  • unstable execution_time [+330.900ms; +359.113ms] or [+251.249%; +272.671%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+650.407op/s; +848.691op/s] or [+6.296%; +8.216%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.820KB; +2.825KB] or [+5.011%; +5.019%]
  • unstable execution_time [+305.325ms; +386.075ms] or [+140.385%; +177.513%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-469.358op/s; -418.410op/s] or [-42.528%; -37.912%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1.271KB; -1.268KB] or [-2.998%; -2.992%]
  • unstable execution_time [+200.579ms; +333.780ms] or [+85.478%; +142.243%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-743.838op/s; -660.411op/s] or [-49.614%; -44.050%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+1.229KB; +1.232KB] or [+2.902%; +2.909%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+333.655ms; +341.084ms] or [+199.564%; +204.008%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-400.150op/s; -364.983op/s] or [-27.862%; -25.413%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+57.993µs; +156.657µs] or [+2.918%; +7.884%]
  • ignore throughput [-29.680op/s; -9.983op/s] or [-5.898%; -1.984%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-18.058µs; -1.326µs] or [-1.241%; -0.091%]
  • ignore throughput [+1.116op/s; +9.183op/s] or [+0.162%; +1.337%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-138.776µs; -61.166µs] or [-4.828%; -2.128%]
  • ignore throughput [+7.512op/s; +23.162op/s] or [+2.159%; +6.658%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+10.768µs; +25.099µs] or [+0.930%; +2.168%]
  • ignore throughput [-17.590op/s; -7.215op/s] or [-2.037%; -0.835%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-35.671µs; -23.897µs] or [-3.308%; -2.216%]
  • ignore throughput [+21.686op/s; +32.300op/s] or [+2.338%; +3.483%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+16.475µs; +27.089µs] or [+0.883%; +1.451%]
  • ignore throughput [-7.625op/s; -4.623op/s] or [-1.423%; -0.863%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-43 bytes; +21 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+251.924µs; +359.015µs] or [+9.840%; +14.023%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-45.053op/s; -31.903op/s] or [-11.534%; -8.167%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-38 bytes; +46 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-176.174µs; -137.974µs] or [-8.924%; -6.989%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+40.080op/s; +50.233op/s] or [+7.912%; +9.916%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-42 bytes; +23 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-138.555µs; -94.157µs] or [-3.514%; -2.388%]
  • ignore throughput [+6.499op/s; +9.342op/s] or [+2.563%; +3.684%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.630ms; +303.879ms] or [+152.399%; +153.027%]
  • ignore throughput [+23.353op/s; +1471.166op/s] or [+0.008%; +0.473%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.355ms; +303.039ms] or [+151.009%; +151.853%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+32156.504op/s; +37419.736op/s] or [+5.070%; +5.900%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.514ms; +303.611ms] or [+150.965%; +152.521%]
  • ignore throughput [+18962.067op/s; +26266.978op/s] or [+3.994%; +5.533%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.965ms; +302.511ms] or [+151.135%; +151.911%]
  • ignore throughput [-1430.143op/s; +202.406op/s] or [-0.479%; +0.068%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.026ms; +300.908ms] or [+147.855%; +148.785%]
  • ignore throughput [+27753.713op/s; +33913.807op/s] or [+4.472%; +5.464%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.464ms; +306.232ms] or [+153.302%; +155.212%]
  • ignore throughput [+5761.103op/s; +14026.151op/s] or [+1.244%; +3.029%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +1 bytes] or [+0.108%; +0.119%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.298ms; +303.841ms] or [+151.726%; +152.501%]
  • ignore throughput [-713.700op/s; +1787.860op/s] or [-0.185%; +0.464%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.875ms; +302.454ms] or [+149.460%; +150.746%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+50264.095op/s; +55856.676op/s] or [+9.981%; +11.091%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.306ms; +301.947ms] or [+148.902%; +150.216%]
  • ignore throughput [-1091.643op/s; +4076.727op/s] or [-0.258%; +0.965%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-141.445µs; +697.847µs] or [-0.070%; +0.347%]
  • ignore throughput [+490.219op/s; +1692.728op/s] or [+0.197%; +0.681%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.003%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.189ms; -12.514ms] or [-7.528%; -5.819%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+26252.960op/s; +32723.949op/s] or [+7.202%; +8.977%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.361ms; +3.578ms] or [-0.181%; +1.795%]
  • ignore throughput [+7685.736op/s; +13300.924op/s] or [+2.805%; +4.855%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4.459KB; -4.431KB] or [-1.623%; -1.613%]
  • unstable execution_time [+7.864µs; +49.765µs] or [+1.942%; +12.292%]
  • ignore throughput [-253.055op/s; -44.800op/s] or [-10.183%; -1.803%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.880KB; -19.859KB] or [-7.252%; -7.244%]
  • unstable execution_time [-53.922µs; -3.011µs] or [-10.657%; -0.595%]
  • ignore throughput [+19.901op/s; +197.933op/s] or [+0.993%; +9.877%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1.801KB; -1.784KB] or [-0.656%; -0.650%]
  • ignore execution_time [-43.616µs; +13.161µs] or [-7.558%; +2.281%]
  • ignore throughput [-28.090op/s; +125.904op/s] or [-1.605%; +7.193%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-2 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-386.801ns; +1023.467ns] or [-0.670%; +1.773%]
  • ignore throughput [-285.636op/s; +114.876op/s] or [-1.648%; +0.663%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.010%; -0.001%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+6.606µs; +10.759µs] or [+15.614%; +25.431%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4817.420op/s; -3043.023op/s] or [-20.280%; -12.810%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +1 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.002%]
  • unstable execution_time [-13.241µs; -5.947µs] or [-20.543%; -9.226%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1499.220op/s; +3040.750op/s] or [+9.198%; +18.656%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2 bytes; +3 bytes] or [+0.061%; +0.072%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.813ms; +304.131ms] or [+153.059%; +153.725%]
  • ignore throughput [-196.710op/s; -172.868op/s] or [-3.287%; -2.889%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.661ms; +304.756ms] or [+154.053%; +155.120%]
  • ignore throughput [+20.002op/s; +94.882op/s] or [+0.248%; +1.177%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.763ms; +304.084ms] or [+150.569%; +152.231%]
  • ignore throughput [-154.254op/s; -77.548op/s] or [-1.965%; -0.988%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-492.244µs; +201.860µs] or [-0.245%; +0.101%]
  • ignore throughput [-8662.038op/s; -7012.846op/s] or [-2.398%; -1.941%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-41.933µs; +655.011µs] or [-0.021%; +0.327%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+48535.051op/s; +53743.361op/s] or [+9.187%; +10.172%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.877ms; +5.593ms] or [+0.951%; +2.835%]
  • ignore throughput [+4012.539op/s; +12307.794op/s] or [+0.950%; +2.913%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.522ms; +302.056ms] or [+149.783%; +150.548%]
  • ignore throughput [-4616.007op/s; -3563.437op/s] or [-3.048%; -2.353%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+0.000%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.211ms; +303.508ms] or [+151.756%; +152.407%]
  • ignore throughput [+4083.988op/s; +5379.783op/s] or [+1.776%; +2.340%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.702ms; +306.982ms] or [+154.525%; +155.682%]
  • ignore throughput [+190.612op/s; +2000.978op/s] or [+0.107%; +1.127%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.169ms; +300.988ms] or [+149.726%; +150.134%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61281900.876op/s; +61525469.019op/s] or [+44.629%; +44.807%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+54 bytes; +56 bytes] or [+0.318%; +0.328%]
  • unstable execution_time [+347.158ms; +390.319ms] or [+431.753%; +485.431%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+844.130op/s; +1021.280op/s] or [+6.526%; +7.895%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.746ms; +300.699ms] or [+149.506%; +149.982%]
  • ignore throughput [+1736989.938op/s; +2678513.471op/s] or [+0.769%; +1.186%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+58.020µs; +1136.156µs] or [+0.029%; +0.568%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-57749.979op/s; -47255.769op/s] or [-6.445%; -5.274%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.634ms; -3.514ms] or [-2.270%; -1.721%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+94117.763op/s; +103984.607op/s] or [+8.787%; +9.709%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.397ms; +5.486ms] or [+0.707%; +2.776%]
  • ignore throughput [+30402.802op/s; +49997.732op/s] or [+3.519%; +5.787%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [+283.592µs; +1511.941µs] or [+0.142%; +0.756%]
  • ignore throughput [-13411.110op/s; -5327.845op/s] or [-1.228%; -0.488%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [+6.773ms; +10.910ms] or [+3.529%; +5.684%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+90671.292op/s; +120364.092op/s] or [+7.018%; +9.316%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.362ms; -2.935ms] or [-2.143%; -1.442%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+76040.947op/s; +84390.222op/s] or [+7.552%; +8.381%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.002%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1429.418µs; -182.519µs] or [-0.711%; -0.091%]
  • ignore throughput [+3436.644op/s; +7277.021op/s] or [+0.766%; +1.621%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.308ms; +5.751ms] or [-0.653%; +2.872%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+48405.348op/s; +60566.376op/s] or [+8.790%; +10.998%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.275ms; +3.805ms] or [-0.138%; +1.912%]
  • ignore throughput [+21341.773op/s; +31072.918op/s] or [+4.777%; +6.955%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-730.812µs; +199.912µs] or [-0.364%; +0.100%]
  • ignore throughput [-21802.898op/s; -18590.022op/s] or [-3.191%; -2.721%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1475.266µs; +2010.474µs] or [-0.738%; +1.006%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+78936.781op/s; +96081.427op/s] or [+8.819%; +10.735%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.673ms; +5.606ms] or [+0.850%; +2.847%]
  • ignore throughput [+20604.449op/s; +35169.567op/s] or [+2.877%; +4.911%]

andrewlock
andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml Outdated
andrewlock
andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml Outdated
andrewlock
andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml Outdated
andrewlock
andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml Outdated
andrewlock
andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml Outdated
andrewlock
andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml Outdated
@andrewlock
Apply suggestions from code review
1bb9407 
Co-authored-by: Andrew Lock <andrewlock.net@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@andrewlock @NachoEchevarria